x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by Emma Lunn

Young Londoners would rather rent a tiny studio flat rather than a large property which was not so well located.

High-end letting agency Knight Frank surveyed 18 to 24-year-olds to ask if they would be happy in a “microflat” – described by the agency as “a small studio flat around 300 square foot in size, in a building with communal entertaining space”. 45% of those questioned in London indicated that they would consider such an option.
 
Apparently 32% of 25 to 34-year-olds and 37% of 35 to 44-year-olds also agreed. The national average, claims Knight Frank, is 27%.
 
Some 56% of 18 to 24-year-olds cited that renting suited their lifestyle needs.  About 30% of 25 to 34-year-olds in London said the same, as did 27% of 35 to 44-year-olds.
 
"In terms of location vs affordability, a significantly higher proportion of Londoners, especially younger tenants, are prepared to live in smaller types of accommodation to ensure they are in a good location at an affordable price," said Grainne Gilmore, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank.

"The private rented sector is growing in London and across the UK. While this is undoubtedly linked to trends in house prices, the sector is also expanding amid a demand for a more flexible workforce in key urban areas."

Comments

  • icon

    If you want to be a bit more accurate, the conversion factor from square feet to square metres is 10.76. So 300 sq ft is equivalent to 27.88 sq m. Therefore a good sized double room of 5m x 5.5m or thereabouts.

    • 10 December 2014 15:35 PM
  • icon

    Divide the 300 by 9 gives you a little over 30 square yards and as near as damn it 30 sq. mtrs.---a bit bigger than your average single car garage.

    • 10 December 2014 08:54 AM
  • icon

    300 square feet? what is that in metres? the whole of Europe measure these things in square metres, why make it so confusing?

    • 10 December 2014 08:39 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal