x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

Self-service agencies are popping up all over the place and claiming they will change the face of lettings in 2012. Is that so?

I’m biased, of course, but I think there are many good reasons to use a good, traditional, local agent over the self-service option. Here are some reasons.

 

Local knowledge:

The largest self-service agent has around 650 properties around the country at the time of writing. This might sound sizeable, but when you take into account that this is nationwide, one needs to put a certain company’s claim that they are set to ‘revolutionise the lettings world’ into context.

 

As a landlord and ‘traditional’ letting agent covering Southend, we successfully let 38 properties in January in Southend. What would that be if you multiply by the number of towns in England?

 

A lot more than 650 certainly. So will they be able to help landlords accurately value their property as they claim? A traditional agent will have a much better idea of the local market. Online agents will often use online advertised prices which may, of course, be different from final prices which they won’t know, as they aren’t usually involved in the completion of the deal. Even if landlords feel they have a good grasp of the local market, they don’t have the everyday exposure of a busy local lettings agent.

 

Cost-effectiveness:

The Changing UK Household Market Report in 2007 highlighted that over two-thirds of landlords have another full-time job and mainly rely on other sources of income. A look at our client profile suggests that still holds true. Many of our clients work in London or abroad and simply do not have the time to accompany viewings themselves. 

 

Is this really the best use of their time? Assuming that they are good at their jobs and paid well enough to have bought investment property in the first place, isn’t their time best spent on their core competencies and letting the agent get on with theirs?

 

Expertise:

Letting a property requires specific skills and knowledge to identify a ‘good’ tenant from a ‘bad’ one, and that’s even before starting the negotiations on obtaining the best rent. Then there is what to put in the contract, getting a reliable credit check, dealing with housing benefit payments, and so on. 

 

These are all skills landlords can learn for themselves, of course, but the market is constantly changing and even though we’ve been doing lettings for 15 years we constantly improve and tweak our procedures, contracts and service to make sure we stay one step ahead. If you are only renting out a few properties a year, rather than a day, might you get caught out?

 

Waiting applicants:

 I know all agents say it, but we do have waiting applicants. We have over 300 people registering a month for our property alerts. Some of them will be ringing for specific properties, but if they turn out not to be suitable, we try and find them something that is. When a new property comes on, we email it out to our database. You don’t get that when you just pay for the listings. Nor do you get a trained salesman getting to know his applicants and stock and putting them together.

 

Traditional marketing:

Now, I am most certainly not against advertising a property online – but not everyone is online and we still get tenants saying they saw a property in the paper, popping into the office for a list and looking in our window display. Plus, as an ARLA approved agent, we list our properties on ARLA’s Property Live. In fact, Property Live has seen a 300% increase in search engine traffic over the past year alone with 100,000 unique visitors a month.

 

Protection:

Some tenants will prefer the presence of an agent, rather than dealing with a private individual – particularly if that agent is a member of a professional body or redress scheme such as ARLA. I know there are many good landlords out there, but you do hear some dreadful stories. 

 

A member of my staff was renting privately until recently and was startled to see her landlord knocking on a window facing her private garden while she was sat in her nightie – he’d got into the garden by taking a fence panel out. 

And that’s all just for the initial lettings process! Many of these online agents are offering ‘full’ property management services as well. I’ve got plenty of arguments against that too – but I’ll save it for next time.

Crystal Horwood is a landlord and also managing director of PACE property specialists in Southend, Essex

Comments

  • icon

    Nice post. Greenlet

    • 15 May 2012 21:30 PM
  • icon

    I have recently been contacted by solicitors claiming to represent the freeholdersof a flat that I have sub let since I bought it.6 years ago The freeholders are not the original company (Bellway homes) that I bought from. The freeholders are now demanding that I ask permission to sub let ( which the original lease asks for).I am happy to ask permission but they want £95 to register the request.! both now and every time the tenant changes. Is this legal? what's to stop them charging £100 or £200? There is no mention of charges in the lease? Does anyone else have this problem?

    • 03 April 2012 22:25 PM
  • icon

    Please remember that vintage watches have survived for many decades by being treated Romance God created the brand since 1988, the company, registered in 102 countries around the world omega seamaster ladies watches,jewelry brand,merchandise exports to 70 countries, is a specialized manufacturer of watches and jewelry. Romance of God in 1998 to become a global brand,hire famous Swiss designer Wolfgang Jonsson program development of brand identity company logos,uniform color. Romance God omega seamaster quartz watches Korea Co., Ltd. has become the leading companies in the industry, the reputation is well known South Korean brand abroad. God watches Co.Ltd. has always been committed to technological innovation and excellence in quality romantic and fashion capture,fashion jewelry has become a world dedicated to business goals and tireless efforts.

    • 08 March 2012 07:04 AM
  • icon

    Hi Mike
    Thanks for your comments. I'll admit the point of my blog was to give some balance to a lot of the coverage you've been getting lately!

    In answer to your question, we always discuss the individual needs of landlords with them and if they want a reduced service level package, we are able to tailor this for them, including advertising only.

    There's a bigger difference than just doing your own viewings between your headline £99 rate and the standard tenant find package of most traditional agents. A better comparison would be from your "traditional tenant find" rate of £299 and then I think the blog above covers most of the benefits of the traditional agent.

    Didn't know you were on Property Live! Glad to hear it. The more the merrier - the other portals keep raising their fees!

    Regards,
    Crystal Horwood
    MD, PACE Plc

    • 26 February 2012 12:00 PM
  • icon

    Hi Crystal.
    For balance I thought it would be worth responding. I'm a director at Upad, the UK's largest online letting agent.

    I completely agree with most of your points. Many landlords, half in fact, agree with you too and use traditional agents. The other half are looking for new options. We're here to give them choice.

    We aren't trying to replace high street agents. We tell our landlords about all their options, including the high street. We're completely open and honest with them. Do you tell your landlords about online lettings? Would you be a little worried that if they knew they could let their property for £99 by doing their own viewings, they might just do that?

    To clarify, we're ARLA registered so list on 'Property Live' which generates 0.02% of our enquiries (we received over 107,000 tenant enquiries last year and track every one)

    Appreciate your blog and look forward to reading future articles.

    Best regards,
    Mike Banks
    Upad Director

    • 24 February 2012 14:26 PM
MovePal MovePal MovePal