x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by Emma Lunn

Two Kent landlords have been fined £20,000 for leaving a flat so severely riddled with damp it posed a risk to tenants’ health.

Property owners Rattan Singh and Balbir Kaur of Henry Street, Chatham, left tenants living in damp conditions and without heating for more than two years.

Another of their flats in the same road, Dale Street, Chatham, was also without heating. Both properties were also lacking vital fire safety alarms.

Medway Council’s private sector housing team first raised informal concerns with the owners in December 2011, and requested improvements be made swiftly.

Despite follow up visits from the council’s “Rogue Landlord Unit”, Singh and Kaur failed to make the necessary improvements and were consequently issued with a formal legal notice in December 2013.

They made no attempt to carry out the work and appeared at Maidstone Magistrates’ Court on 6 November where they pleaded guilty to 19 offences including failing to comply with notices under the Housing Act 2004.

They were fined £20,000 and must pay £600 costs as well as a £150 victim surcharge.

The prosecution by the council’s private sector housing team was undertaken following a successful bid for government funding to specifically tackle rogue landlords in Medway. This was the first case for the authority’s Rogue Landlord Unit which is investigating a number of other cases.

Medway Council’s director for regeneration, community and culture Robin Cooper said: “Landlords must remember that the properties they are renting out must be safe and free of risks to the health of their tenants. The council will not accept tenants being placed in danger through the deliberate actions of their landlords or agents.

“We will always try to work with co-operative landlords and support them in running their businesses. This case shows that those who don’t comply will be followed up and if necessary, prosecuted.”

Comments

  • icon

    Medway council actually doing something, wonders will never cease. I reported an HMO to them with numerous faults, that had been issued with an improvement notice 12 months before and nothing has been done about it.

    • 20 November 2014 17:29 PM
  • icon

    ethnicity is irrelevant - just bad landlords.

    Why would a tenant stay there for 2 years if it is that bad?

    I have a colleague who wants to sue landlord for damp that has been "bad for years". As I am now a landlord, I have to look at the other side and asked her why she stayed there if it was that bad. She answered " I don't know, was easier than moving"

    Bad landlords reflect on all of us trying to do a good job, but tenants need to make a proactive stand also - Best thing for a bad landlord to learn a lesson, is an empty house surely?

    • 20 November 2014 11:53 AM
  • icon

    J Karna..... I agree there seems to be a pattern developing...

    I see this is claimed as some victory, hmm... Come back with the party poppers when you get the 20K from them...

    Bet they don't see a penny of it

    • 20 November 2014 10:00 AM
  • icon

    More Asian slum landlords.

    • 20 November 2014 09:01 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal