Torys under attack for “fit for habitation” comments

Torys under attack for “fit for habitation” comments


Todays other news
Larger and corporate landlords can spread the costs of tighter...
There’s been a series of high profile controversies...
The government wants to replace leasehold with commonhold...
Rachel Reeves has floated a number of property tax ideas...


A Conservative MP has been widely criticised in the press for saying the proposed law for landlords saying they need to make homes “fit for human habitation” is not needed.

Philip Davies, MP for Shipley, spoke out after Labour MP Karen Buck’s Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Bill proposal was presented to Parliament on Friday.

If passed, the bill would resurrect a law from 1885 which has been rendered obsolete by nearly 60 years of rent inflation.

Tenants already have the right to a home that is fit for human habitation, but only if the rent is less than £52 per annum (or £80 in London) – limits last revised in 1957.

Buck told MPs the current law requires landlords to fix things that have fallen into disrepair but they’re under no legal obligation to remedy problems such as condensation or mould.

Davies, a landlord himself, said the new bill proposed by Buck would put “a huge burden on landlords”.

“My contention would be … I don’t think this particular bill is necessary to achieve what I would like to see,” he said at the debate. “[It’s] as if [landlords] have nothing else to do but wade through legislation generated by this House.

“The overwhelming majority of landlords, and I will put myself in this category, want to do the right thing and wouldn’t ever dream of renting out a property that isn’t in a fit state to be rented out and want to comply with every regulation that’s introduced.”

Davies was one of two MPs widely criticised for “filibustering” or talking out the revenge evictions bill presented to MPs in November last year.

Tags: Politics

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The study has been commissioned by a developer called Pocket...
The project is master-minded by Women's Aid UK...
Southwark Council is Labour controlled...
Landlord repossessions have increased by 6.8% across England and Wales...
Social housing sub-letting lies at the heart of the problem...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Larger and corporate landlords can spread the costs of tighter...
There’s been a series of high profile controversies...
The government wants to replace leasehold with commonhold...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.