By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


Council ‘disappointed’ as licensing scheme is refused

Plans to introduce landlord licences in Redbridge have been thrown out by the Secretary of State.

Redbridge Council said it was “extremely disappointed” at the Secretary of State’s decision not to approve the implementation of a borough-wide wide licensing landlord scheme.

More than 1,700 surveys were completed during the consultation period, of which 463 were landlords or agents. There was overwhelming support from tenants and residents for the scheme. A doorstep survey of over 500 residents was also carried out of which 86% respondents supported licensing.


The council claimed that evidence provided to the Secretary of State showed a significant amount of anti-social behaviour was associated with privately rented properties and the council hoped a borough-wide scheme would give it “the vital tools to help ensure that landlords of private rented properties take responsibility for standard and safety of their property and deal with any problems caused by their tenants.”

In his response to the council's application the Secretary of State stated that although the case for a whole borough scheme had not been met, there are some wards in the borough where the link between anti-social behaviour and privately rented properties had been demonstrated.

In light of the comments made by the Secretary of State Redbridge Council will now consider whether to update and evaluate the evidence base to determine whether to consult on a smaller scheme. 

Councillor Athwal, Leader of the Council said: “We are extremely disappointed, that despite evidence provided, our application has been turned down to allow us to implement a borough wide scheme for private property licensing.

“We strongly believe that a borough wide scheme is vital to hold landlords to account for the actions of their tenants including noise, rubbish and vandalism and other anti-social behaviour related to some private rented properties.

“Without a borough wide scheme it will be impossible for us to readily identify who is responsible for a property and deal proactively with poor standards of rented accommodation. Sadly, we will now have to go back to the drawing board and consider our options.”

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    Since when were landlords responsible for policing? and immigration? and training themselves in doing these jobs?
    Why don't upset residents just call the normal police if there is an issue with neighbours? Oh sorry, it must be the neighbours landlords fault. They are much easier to fine and make criminally responsible than the actual perpetrators of the crime.

  • Mark Hulbert

    Absolutely correct James. It's about time that communities began to realise that holding landlords to blame for just about every property-related problem - anti-social behaviour by tenants, rising house prices. Tenants are citizens with their own responsibilities, and councils and neighbours should address any issues to them directly; the landlord has no greater power over them. Similarly, property investors never push prices up - they push prices downward to the realistic level where the price reflects the money that people are prepared to pay to live in the property; it is owner-occupiers who push prices up to unrealistic levels. If they blame the wrong people then the "solutions" won't work.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up