Two Brighton unregistered HMO landlords fined

Two Brighton unregistered HMO landlords fined


Todays other news
Fiscal advice is what landlords most want from brokers, a...
The Scottish additional homes tax is the highest level anywhere...
The average cost of damage done by a tenant is...
The latest lender to try to woo landlords is Accord,...
Shamplina has won this accolade three times in the past...


Two Brighton & Hove landlords of shared houses have been prosecuted for failing to license their properties as Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) with one facing a £20,000 fine.

Both were prosecuted under the Housing Act 2004 at Eastbourne Magistrates Court. Neither defendant appeared at the hearing this week and neither was represented.

Sarah Jordan, who is the landlord of 32 Stroudley Road, in St Peter’s & North Laine ward, was fined a city record £20,000 for an unlicensed HMO with £750 costs.

After multiple attempts to avoid licensing, Gagandeep Sethi, who owns 50 Carlyle Avenue, which is in the ward of Moulsecoomb & Bevendean, was prosecuted and fined £14,000 with £750 costs. Sethi submitted a plea of guilty by post although no mitigation was submitted.

Both were ordered to pay a criminal courts charge of £150 and £120 Victim Surcharge.

Cllr Anne Meadows, chair of the housing and new homes committee at Brighton City Council, said: “This sends out a strong message that landlords of shared homes or houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) should licence their properties where a licence is required. The worst HMOs are some of the most dangerous properties so it’s right that we take action to protect our residents.

“Under HMO licensing we have seen hundreds of HMOs fitted with fire alarms, made safer generally and better managed. As part of the licensing process we inspect the houses and that allows us to ensure that they are safe.

“I am pleased that in imposing this level of fines the court has reflected the importance of licensing and that owners should not seek to avoid applying. We will continue to take action against those who do not apply so I would urge all owners and agents to ensure that they and their properties meet legal requirements.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Knight Frank has set out its forecast for the rental...
The number of properties for sale in London that were...
A council has revealed that it sells off its housing...
One of the UK’s most high profile lettings agents is...
Council will pay part of tenants’ rent to private landlords...
A mortgage chief is warning that thousands of buy to...
The government says it will shortly start a formal consultation...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Changes in the Budget could significantly charge financial planning for...
Next year should see stability and opportunity in the private...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here