By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


Allen & Crane Estates expelled by TPO

The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has expelled Allen & Crane Estates for two years following complaints from landlords.

Allen & Crane Estates, a sales and lettings agent based in Burnham near Slough, failed to comply with numerous elements of the code of practice for residential letting agents and subsequently failed to pay a £1,600 award to the complainants.

The decision to exclude Allen & Crane Estates from TPO membership arose following a complaint from landlords who raised a number of concerns connected with the performance of the agent when they let a property through the agent. 


All of the complaints made by the landlords were upheld to varying degrees by the Ombudsman, Christopher Hamer.

The agent allowed tenants to take occupation of the property without the landlords’ knowledge and without evidence of reference checks having been carried out, making them in breach of paragraphs 7b and 7g of the TPO code of practice.

There was also a delay in providing the landlords with a copy of the tenancy agreement. Other issues included the agent’s failure to obtain any security deposit or a valid guarantor agreement, failure to provide regular and clear statements of account following rent being paid in irregular instalments and finally their inability to demonstrate that they had inspected the property regularly or upon check-out.

The complainant also complained that Allen & Crane Estates were difficult to communicate with.

Following the investigation, the ombudsman awarded the complainants a total of £1,600 in compensation. Allen & Crane Estates have still not paid the award.

Hamer said: “My role as property ombudsman is to impartially review complaints made by members of the public against agents based on the evidence that is submitted to me. I aim to promote a resolution in full and final settlement of a complaint, and will determine appropriate redress where I am satisfied that the actions of an agent have disadvantaged a complainant.

“In examining the issues involved, I take into account the relevant parts of the TPO code of practice and the obligations contained therein. The shortcomings in the service provided by Allen & Crane Estates that I identified, particularly with regards to the lack of referencing and security deposits, are serious, and are matters which have significantly disadvantaged the complainants. I therefore supported the complaints that have been made.”

The disciplinary and standards committee of TPO considered that Allen & Crane’s failure to comply with the code and to pay the award were serious and flagrant breaches of the code of practice and decided Allen & Crane should be excluded from TPO for a minimum of two years.

Allen & Crane Estates had been a member of TPO since May 2007, but withdrew whilst this complaint was being considered. They instead joined the Property Redress Scheme which was unaware of the disciplinary action against this agent, but have since suspended membership and this will not be reinstated until the award has been settled.

“Agents cannot avoid paying awards if they jump from one scheme to another. Under the guidance of the Department for Communities and Local Government the three approved redress schemes will not accept into membership any agent that does not meet its obligations to another scheme,” said Hamer, “Allen & Crane’s membership with PRS has now been suspended and will not be reinstated until they receive confirmation from TPO that the award has been paid in full and the issue has been resolved.”

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up