Government clampdown “deterring” BTL investors

Government clampdown “deterring” BTL investors


Todays other news
Jonathan Dinsdale is a senior associate in the Thames Valley...
Landlords warn anti-PRS rhetoric risks driving more investors out of...
Justice for Property Rights urges ministers to adopt a balanced,...
Prime Minister Burnham may lead a clampdown on private landlords...
The rate of arrears growth has slowed, suggesting a gradual...


The government’s attack on the buy-to-let sector means 9% of potential investors have cancelled their plans to buy property while around one in seven (14%) existing landlords say they will sell one or more of their BTL properties because of new rules, according to research by an online investment platform.

rplan.co.k says around one in four of those UK adults who were considering a buy-to-let property investment have been put off by the Government’s plan to introduce a 3% additional stamp duty and cut tax relief on their finance costs.
  
Under the changes, the stamp duty on buying a £250,000 buy-to-let property will rise from £2,500 to £10,000 from April, while that for a £400,000 property will more than double from £10,000 to £22,000. Also, from 2017, the tax relief currently allowed on finance costs such as interest payments on mortgages and loans to buy furnishings will be gradually reduced over four years.
 

The research found that those planning to invest in buy-to-let were going to use savings and investments worth an average of £43,592 to buy a property. Instead, 39% of these adults will use the money to save in a cash account, 30% will invest in an ISA, 20% will put it into their pension and 13% will put it in other stock market investments.
  
Stuart Dyer, rplan.co.uk’s CIO, said: “The British have strong faith in property as an investment and many see it as a means of providing a pension income. But the government clearly has a policy to dis-incentivise BTL and the sharp increase in landlord mortgages revealed by the Bank of England credit survey will probably be a last rush before the gate slams shut. 
 
“Having a BTL property can also mean an over-exposure to one asset class for many investors, who should strongly consider the alternative of investing in a diversified portfolio for the long term, especially if this can be achieved through a tax-free ISA wrapper.”
 
 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The data has been published by the government today...
New research suggests the impact on rents will be severe....
The BBC and The Times have discovered the council tax...
Two activist groups are demanding the government “slam the brakes...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Jonathan Dinsdale is a senior associate in the Thames Valley...
Landlords warn anti-PRS rhetoric risks driving more investors out of...
Justice for Property Rights urges ministers to adopt a balanced,...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.