By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


Buy-to-let tax changes could be catalyst for a ‘major price correction’

Residential property prices could be on the verge of falling sharply largely because of the government’s buy-to-let tax changes, according the head of Landlord Mortgages.

The changes to stamp duty, tax relief and new tougher mortgage application rules could make it harder to make a profit from letting property, which in turn could deter investment in the sector and drive home prices down. 

Aside from the extra 3% stamp duty surcharge, the amount landlords can claim in mortgage interest relief will be limited to 20% from 2017, which will eat into many landlords’ rental returns, especially higher and additional rate taxpayers, making buy-to-let a far less attractive proposition.


Lee Grandin of Landlord Mortgages accepts that no one can call when a market bubble will burst, but believes that the buy-to-let tax changes could be a catalyst for a "major price correction".

He told the press: "If commentators are stating the property market is overvalued then the sudden supply of property post buy-to-let tax changes could well be the catalyst for a major price correction."

Grandin added: "It was never going to be politically acceptable or sustainable to have Tom, Dick and Harry own a buy-to-let portfolio.

"Take note: A price correction where the losers are Tom, Dick and Harry with a buy-to-let portfolio and the banks who supported them is a vote winner."

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    But if Nick, Robert & Felicity (who just own property to live in) also see the value of their homes fall, the "vote winner" might just turn into a vote loser - there are many more homeowners than landlords !
    Politicians often fall foul of the unintended consequences of their actions. They're really not terribly bright !

  • Brit Sixteen Sixty Four

    Yes but Nick, Robert & Felicity stuck in a 1 bed flat with their children see prices fall then the gap in the next step of the ladder shrink and they can move into a family home.

    Meanwhile Sophie, Luke and Mohamed can finally afford to get onto the property ladder.

    Section 24 is helping to address inter-generation inequalities.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up