By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


Over £4.1bn in rental deposits ‘being lost to the British economy’

dLighted, the insurance backed deposit-free renting solution, is once again trying to persuade more landlords and tenants to use its service by pointing to fresh data obtained from the Department of Communities and Local Government (SCLG) which reveals that as of March 31 this year the total cash value of deposits held in deposit protection schemes was £4,107m, up 22% on the previous figure of £3.2bn being held in deposits.

The data reveals that 14,011,116 deposits are protected in a deposit protection service licensed by DCLG, but Dlighted, as part of its #ditchthedeposit campaign, argue that the money is being lost to the British economy.

The figures also show there is a deposit dispute in just 1.5% of tenancies – meaning deposits are unnecessary on 98.5% of occasions.


Estimates by Dlighted – calculated by multiplying the number of privately rented households by the average cost of a standard deposit of four weeks rent – suggest that close to £2bn is currently being used for deposits on rented homes in London alone.

A further £54m is being used on rental deposits in Birmingham, £49m in Liverpool and £47m in Manchester.

Newcastle and Sunderland in the firms’ native North East meanwhile see deposits of £35m and £18m.

The total estimated value of tenancy deposits in the UK’s biggest 15 cities is as follows: 

1.         London - £1.98bn
2.         Birmingham - £53.9m
3.         Liverpool - £49.1
4.         Manchester - £47.3m
5.         Leeds - £36.6m
6.         Newcastle- £34.8m
7.         Southampton - £33.1m
8.         Sheffield - £31.4m
9.         Cardiff - £28.3m
10.        Nottingham - £24.8m
11.        Bristol - £23.6m
12.        Leicester - £22.4m
13.        Sunderland - £17.8
14.        Glasgow - £17.3
15.        Belfast - £16.4

Ajay Jagota, head of the #ditchthedeposit campaign, is urging the government to give Britain’s renter’s greater access to deposit-free renting through deposit replacement insurance, and to convert Britain’s £4.1bn of cash deposits into Help to Buy ISAs for renters wanting to save for homes of their own.

He said: “I don’t know how anyone could see £4.1bn being lost to the British economy by something which is unnecessary 98.5% of the time and believe that the way we rent homes in the UK is not in need of reform.

“Deposits raise the cost of renting, helping to put home ownership out of reach for many renters but they don’t provide landlords with meaningful protection against unpaid rent or property damage.

“With the government planning to cap deposits at four-weeks rent, landlords will soon only be covered in the event of a single month of unpaid arrears, at a time when Universal Credit has seen some rent arrears quintupling. And that’s before you consider property damage or legal costs.

“#ditchthedeposits is asking the government to make renting cheaper while protecting landlords better – and by releasing £4.1bn into the economy they would have as much to gain as anyone.”

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • cantseethewood forthetrees

    Who writes this stuff? Just because there's only a dispute with 1.5% of protected deposits why does that automatically mean that 98.5% of the time it's pointless taking them? What's the % where landlords rightfully deducted sums for breakages,repairs, unpaid rent etc. from the deposit and the tenants haven't disputed because they don't have a leg to stand on? IMO the main driver of ensuring many tenants act responsibly during their tenancy is down to them having some 'skin in the game' too. The desire to get your dosh back at the end of a tenancy is a good carrot to have. I can foresee an increase in claims and a major hike in premiums if deposit related insurance is used to replace all deposits and, more importantly, who will be expected to pay those premiums? I don't suppose for one minute the plan will be for tenants to pay that either.....

  • icon

    The deposits are locked up in a castle vault in cash are they?

    Who ever is holding that money will have it invested and of course(?!) and they will insure the cash as the law says. That investment will become part of the cash flow of the country and hopefully used to earn more money for us all or more especially the tax man as our taxes are so high.

    Try renting a car without a deposit or a signed bank payment authorisation of some sort. Deposits are there to drop costs generated by the customer back to the customer an not the landlord in this case.

    In a years time there will be hardly any BTLs to be found as the market contracts and rents will be very high. It will only take 2-3,000 properties to come off the market and there will be a shortage. Yes there may be tens of thousands of properties being let but most are let all the time so a permanent shortage shortage of 2,000 properties will register as a huge problem with newspapers and daft politicians.

    Tenants should have to be to pay out their deposits for all the costs generated by themselves. Deposits are a much more equitable way of doing things since costs go straight back to the people who do the damage.

    The previous comment is bang on the mark.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up