By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


No ‘compelling evidence’ as to why tenants should pay letting fees

Buy-to-let landlords should be responsible for paying letting agent fees in Wales, despite some concerns that this will lead to higher rents as landlords seek to pass on the costs, according to the Welsh government.

A Welsh government report claims that there is “no compelling evidence” for tenants to pay upfront letting agent fees or renewal costs to existing tenancies because “the large majority of the work undertaken by agents is work that the landlord would otherwise be doing themselves”.

The report also acknowledges that “referencing tenants is a service to landlords, not tenants and that there is “work involved for agents setting up a new tenancy” and that they “do not generally make excessive profits on setup fees in relation to costs incurred”.


The report added: “Inventories and tenancy agreements do protect both parties from false accusations, but it is soon to be a legal obligation on the landlord to provide a tenancy agreement, and therefore it is a service to the landlord to do this job for them.

“Arranging viewings and advertising a property are also a service to landlords, just as a job advert 60 is paid for by the employer, and estate agents charge sellers, not buyers, to advertise their home.”

The Welsh government launched a consultation on banning fees to tenants last month, after announcing on 27 June that it will take legislative action to prevent ‘unfair’ fees.

The consultation seeks views on the nature and level of fees being charged to tenants. It seeks to determine which fees, if any, are justifiably being charged to tenants. It also seeks information on fees paid by landlords to agents, and on the consequence of banning fees.

The deadline for comments is 27 September 2017.

Research by the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA Propertymark) shows beyond doubt that “legislation would ultimately cost tenants more,” said David Cox, ARLA Propertymark chief executive. 

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    We ask out tenants to provide a "Scottish Disclosure". They pay £25 for their financial and criminal history.. They have to do it under the data protection act.. If they then rent a room.. we refund it..
    I have to do the same when I work.. so I don't see any reason why they shouldn't

  • G romit

    The Welsh Govt. has just ably demonstrated that they do not understand how business works even at an elementary level.

    Business101: in a sustainable business; the customer (Tenant) pays for all costs incurred by the business.

    This is typical of Governments who meddle in things they do not understand for the sake of a few favourable headlines and sound-bites.

  • icon

    "Estate Agents charge sellers, not buyers"

    Whilst this may seem correct, estate agents do not go to the admin lengths lettings agents do with tenants. Mortgage brokers do that side of things and guess what.... they charge for this service. So what is the difference there?

    Some agents do over charge their tenants, bring in a fair price cap rather than ban fees completely.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up