x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

BTL landlords shun new controversial licensing scheme

The new licensing scheme for rented homes in Nottingham is set to come into force on Wednesday, August 1, and yet it has so far only received applications from 10% of the city's properties.

The new controversial licensing regime, which is set to cover in the region of 32,000 privately rented homes, affecting 91% of landlords in the city, is believed to be the second largest scheme in the UK outside of London.

Registration for the scheme has been open for a month, requiring landlords whose properties are in the designated areas to register, with accredited landlords required to pay £480 per property, while non-accredited must pay £780.

Designated areas include Arboretum, Bestwood, Bulwell, Bulwell Forest, Basford, Berridge, Bridge, Clifton North, Clifton South, Dales, Dunkirk and Lenton, Leen Valley, Mapperley, Radford and Park, Sherwood, St Ann’s, Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey.

Failure to comply with the new scheme could lead to a civil penalty of up to £30,000, or prosecution on summary conviction which carries an unlimited maximum fine. Landlords may also be prevented from holding a licence in the future.

However, the scheme has not been well received, with a recent petition calling on the government to carry out a review of Nottingham City Council’s Selective Licensing Scheme, attracting more than 1,700 signatures.

Although 32,000 or so properties need a licence, the local authority has merely received just 3,140 applications so far - and the deadline is in less than 48 hours.

David Thomas, director of Liberty Gate, a letting agent based in the Lace Market, told the Nottingham Post that it was always going to be “impossible” to get 32,000 properties registered in just one month.

He said: “This [new licensing scheme] is ruining the private rented sector in Nottingham.

“The council has not informed one single landlord directly. It is an absolute shambles. To get all these properties done in one month was impossible from the start.

“They are lucky they have 3,140. It can take weeks to get one application through and I have 120 I need to submit [on behalf of landlord clients].

“Rent will go up immediately - £25 a month to recover it over the long term. It is an expense that landlords never factored in and they need to pay the mortgage.

“Some landlords are having to pay for 50 properties - and the people who are feeling the pain are the tenants.”

Thomas reports that the “majority” of landlords are planning to put rents up, while around a quarter are selling up.

“There will be more people who are homeless,” he added. “The only ones who are winning are the council by raising £20m from this.”

Mike Siebert, chair of Nottingham Park Residents Association, believes that the licensing scheme will offer Nottingham City Council “more control over the absentee landlords”, but ultimately agrees that “it is just a way of making money for the council”.

He commented: “It backfires if rents go up. It is more expensive to rent than get a mortgage so it will be worse for them. If everyone puts up the price of rent what is it achieving?”

Poll: Do you think the new licensing scheme for landlords will 'raise the standards' in Nottingham’s privately rented sector, ensuring that 'all tenants living in them are able to enjoy a safe, comfortable and well managed home'?

PLACE YOUR VOTE BELOW

  • icon

    Hey I have already increased my rents by £25 per property pcm. In the consultation NCC were warned rents would increase. The 1 property outside the licence area hasn’t had an increase for 2 years I won’t be increasing it next month either, my returns are good, I have a great stable tenant and have had no increase in expenses so why get gready. The other properties would have been the same except for NCC wanting money. As a business I pass my expenses to my customer

  • icon

    how can they justify £780 per property? as this article states though it will of course end up with the tenant paying more rent to cover yet another expense , government ,both local and central, have really got it in for the poor tenant haven't they?

  • icon

    add to rent with rider to that effect

  • icon

    Somehow, very soon, somehow we are going to have to force councils to see sense on this and many things. We seem to have a policy of, "If it exists then let's tax it". This all fits in nicely with looking for nice opinions and then introducing some local charge to turn that opinion into votes at the next election. There is a total absence of long term planning such as costing future pension costs of all their new workers and creating funds for major local works and repairs in twenty years time. I suppose screwing landlords for cash is seen as a way of covering costs but all properties already attract rates and that includes let properties. In effect let houses are being taxed twice over. I thought double taxation was illegal?

  • icon

    public sector is a giant parasite designed to vote labor--50% could be culled with no reduction in "services"

    ps double taxation is common eg petrol and beer

  • icon

    Parasites

icon

Please login to comment

valpal
submit
sign up