Andrew Turner, chief executive at specialist buy-to-let mortgage broker Commercial Trust Limited, said: “For most landlords, who are managing properties that are in good condition and are well maintained, there should not be anything new to do.
“However, landlords should be on their guard as there is the potential for landlords to find themselves subject to court action from tenants, for breach of contract, should a property not meet required standards. Landlords could find themselves forced to carry out improvements and could be subject to compensation claims.
“There is the possibility that a landlord could be sued for damages, for the full duration of the contract.”
The legislation has been brought in to help raise living standards in the PRS.
Turner points out that there are a number of housing issues being looked at, which include:
• repair work;
• stability;
• levels of dampness in the property;
• internal arrangement;
• how much natural lighting there is in the property;
• the amount of ventilation;
• the quality of the water supply;
• how well drainage and sanitary conveniences work;
• what facilities there are for the preparation and cooking of food and for the disposal of waste water;
• and, Hazards under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System.
Under the new rules, a home needs to be regarded as significantly defective in one or more of the above areas, in order to be considered as unfit.
The Act states: “The house shall be regarded as unfit for human habitation if, and only if, it is so far defective in one or more of those matters that it is not reasonably suitable in that condition”.
A judge will ultimately make the decision on whether or not this is the case, according to Turner.
He continued: “If a problem arises in a rental property, there is an expectation that the tenant will notify the landlord, in order for any issue to be repaired within a reasonable timeframe.
“In this sense, the current landlord obligations will not change.
“So in the case of joint tenancies, a landlord will need to be made aware of a defect during the tenancy, by the tenant. The landlord must then respond within reasonable time frame to fix this issue.
“When the property is rented out on a per room basis, for example if it is a shared property or House of Multiple Occupancy, the landlord’s obligation is instantaneous, from the moment the defect occurs, regardless of whether or not the tenant informs them.
“The landlord will again be obliged to remedy the issue within a ‘reasonable time frame’ which would be determined by the nature of the problem and potentially external factors.”
Whilst the landlord will be responsible for addressing issues in most cases, the Act does not make landlords liable for damage or disrepair caused by the tenant’s conduct.
Furthermore, the landlord will not be expected to rebuild or reinstate a destroyed building or to carry out works which are the responsibility of a superior landlord, or where it is not possible to obtain necessary third party consent.
Turner added: “The majority of landlords will not need to do anything, if they are maintaining a property in good condition, so long as they react appropriately, should a defect be reported.
“The law may have more significant ramifications where the landlord is responsible for a regulated tenancy, where repair and modernisation are restricted by the presence of a sitting tenant.”
You can read more on the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018, by clicking here.
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
Whilst I hate rogue landlords, surely most sub standard properties are still better than cardboard boxes?
Agreed, rogue landlords give the rest of us a bad name, however rogue landlords tend to house the rogue tenants we don't want. I would also point out there are many very sub standard council owned houses and flats, try getting councils to carry out repairs to their properties, they don't want to know.
The fewer rental properties the more rents can be increased by LL who have decent properties.
However I believe as has been mentioned that even a not so great property still beats a cardboard box or TA.
LL should naturally be cajoled to improve their properties.
Councils could offer finance to such LL to improve their properties with the Council imposing a charge on the property so that when a sale eventually occurs they have their loan returned.
Many LL simply can't obtain the finance to improve their properties and as LL start to understand the full import of the increasingly stringent EPC regulations many LL will just sell these sub-standard properties leaving the proverbial cardboard box as the next most viable housing solution for the now homeless tenants!!!
Please login to comment