Letting agent banned for failing to protect £68k worth of tenants’ deposits

Letting agent banned for failing to protect £68k worth of tenants’ deposits

Todays other news
A lettings agency has analysed May's rent movements...
The analysis has come from lettings agency Hamptons...
The app tells landlords when big events are happening nearby...
Manchester is the fastest growing city for prices over the...
Landlord’s company fined over licensing breach...


A senior director at a letting agency in Exeter has been handed a six-year ban after failing to safeguard more than £68,000 worth of tenants’ deposits.

Clear Lettings Limited, better known as Clear Property, operated a custodial deposit scheme, in accordance with the Housing Act 2004, enabling the company to safely hold onto tenants’ deposits on behalf of their landlords.

But for more than two years, Kelly Forrester, the firm’s director, caused the company to collect tenants’ deposits connected to at least 54 properties but did not pay them into the government-backed custodial deposit scheme. 

Instead, the 40-year old spent the money on the general running of the company.

The misconduct was uncovered after Clear Lettings entered into liquidation proceedings in April 2019 and the Insolvency Service conducted investigations into the activities of Forrester while director of the firm.

 

The Secretary of State accepted a disqualification undertaking from Kelly Forrester after she did not dispute that she had caused Clear Lettings failure to ensure that deposits taken from tenants by the company totalling at least £68,356 were safeguarded, as required by law.

Effective from 14 January 2020, Forrester is banned for six years from acting as a director or directly or indirectly becoming involved, without the permission of the court, in the promotion, formation or management of a company.

Dave Elliott, chief investigator for the Insolvency Service, commented: “Kelly Forrester failed to safeguard the deposits she was entrusted to hold onto, resulting in losses to both landlords and tenants.

“Her conduct fell short of what is required of a director of a limited liability company and her disqualification will act as a deterrent to others from similar conduct in the future.” 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Landlord’s company fined over licensing breach...
The landlord failed to fix safety hazards at a property...
Conman landlord jailed for fraud...
It's another Article 4 direction requested by a council seeking...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
The warning says no landlord, anywhere, is immune from the...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Graham Hayward is Managing Director of Housing Hand...
From 1 July 2026, the energy price cap rises by...
Landlords have spent much of the past fortnight staring at...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.