A legal challenge has been started to the government’s current ‘ban’ on bailiff-enforced evictions in the private rental sector.
High profile property lawyer David Smith is now leading a legal challenge to the ban, which was triggered by a written request to bailiffs by the government not to enforce possession cases agreed by courts. Initially this was to apply to Tier 2 and Tier 3 but it has now been extended across England for the duration of the current lockdown.
Smith, who is a partner at JMW Solicitors, has spoken out against the way in which the de facto ban was introduced via a letter from the Lord Chancellor, and he says: “Such an important decision cannot simply be made by writing a letter on a whim. Many cases of rent arrears were in place before Covid-19 hit – and landlords must be able to tackle the most serious cases.”
He continues: “This letter from the Lord Chancellor does not constitute a legal framework and has breached the landlords’ civil and human rights as well as usurping the power or Parliament. This must be corrected, and quickly.”
Smith says he does not challenge the right of government to prevent evictions if it wishes to but he believes it should be done by making regulations under the appropriate legislation and allowing Parliament to review them, not through what he describes as “backdoor letters to enforcement bodies.”
Smith - who appealed for landlords to mount a challenge earlier this month - submitted his claim for a Judicial Review on November 6 and a response is expected this week.
The initial nationwide ban on evictions introduced in the early spring was part of the Coronavirus legislation, and came while courts were also closed as part of the spring lockdown.
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
A letter requesting ? well that's not law, so why would bailiffs take any notice of it ?
Wouldn't want the publicity I suppose if they ignored the letter. David is spot on though, this letter basically asks baliffs to ignore the law, ie a Court Order. If HMG want to change the law, then that's their choice, subject to parliamentary approval. Ignoring it when it suits them though is classic dictatorship stuff, I am surprised we have not heard more on this.
I always thought it a bit strange that bailiffs were asked not to do their job. If they agree to the request, do they still get paid?
Please login to comment