Tribunal upholds civil penalty notice and fine on landlord

Tribunal upholds civil penalty notice and fine on landlord


Todays other news
The area’s high concentration of flats appears to have amplified...
That’s according to Handelsbanken’s fifth annual Property Investor Report....
59% say they are tightening tenant selection criteria...
Lower average house prices and rising letting income combine to...
Searches for ‘London’ fell 14% and searches for London postcode...


A £4,550 fine has been upheld after an appeal by the landlord was rejected by a property tribunal.

Fenland council served five civil penalty notices on the landlord earlier this year for failing to rectify safety hazards at the block of flats he owned.

The landlord appealed one of the penalty notices relating to defective windows, which was heard by the Eastern Residential Property First-tier Tribunal; this has now published its findings and dismissed the appeal. 

Fenland council officers first inspected the block of three flats in Wisbech in early 2018 and identified significant breaches of regulations including non-working fire alarm system and defects to the fire doors; building defects including damp, severely worn carpets on the stairs, insufficient heating and inadequate security; and defective, warped and rotting windows

The council served improvement notices requiring remedial works but the woek was not completed within the specified time scale or not to the standard required. Consequently, the council issued five civil penalty notices for failing to comply with the improvement notices, totalling £8,852.

 

 

To date, that particular council has served 29 civil penalties ranging from fines of £500 to £30,000 and a spokeswoman says: “We will not hesitate to use legal powers to improve standards in the private rented sector and landlords who place the health and safety of tenants at risk can expect enforcement action to be taken against them. It’s also a warning to tenants that if they sublet, we can and will serve penalties on them as they are in effect the landlord.”      

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Drug gang landlord caught after Google search goof...
Prime Minister Burnham may lead a clampdown on private landlords...
The council claims the fee is to cover the costs...
The event takes place at the end of June...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Jonathan Dinsdale is a senior associate in the Thames Valley...
Landlords warn anti-PRS rhetoric risks driving more investors out of...
Justice for Property Rights urges ministers to adopt a balanced,...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.