Government says No to separate fees for pets in rental properties

Government says No to separate fees for pets in rental properties


Todays other news
The courts will have to handle a significant increase in...
Taxes and spending cuts are set to be on the...
The Spring Statement comes up this Wednesday...
The Bill is expected to become law in the summer...


The government is not budging on the Tenant Fees Act and will not amend it to allow separate and additional charging for pet insurance or to cover pet damage.

Conservative Andrew Rosindell MP, a long-time advocate of allowing pets into private rental properties, tabled a written question to Robert Jenrick, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on the matter.

Rosindell asked Jenrick what assessment his department had made of the potential merits of adding pet deposits to the list of permitted payments in the Tenant Fees Act 2019 for pet ownership in rented accommodation.

This week the housing minister Eddie Hughes ruled out the move, replying: “The Tenant Fees Act 2019 introduced a cap of five weeks’ rent for properties with an annual rent below £50,000, and banned most letting fees charged to tenants.

“The five week cap should be considered the maximum, rather than the default amount charged. 

“This approach should therefore accommodate private renters who wish to keep pets, without the need for a separate pet deposit. The government has no plans  at this time  to amend the Tenant Fees Act 2019.”

 

Various pressure groups have been lobbying to change the Act, and last week 30 MPs wrote to Jenrick urging the same.

And in a foreword to a report by pro-pet group AdvoCATS, Rosindell wrote earlier this year: “The Tenant Fees Act of 2019 had positive aims but it has clearly been harmful to the cause of greater pet ownership fo renters, an issue which has come to a head given the loneliness and self-isolation many have suffered during this pandemic, something which a dog or a cat could really ameliorate.

“Amending it to allow for landlords to require insurance as part of the permitted payments might only be a start, but it would be a positive start and I hope the government explores this as an option.” 

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Shelter has coordinated an open letter from 40 economists...
Inventory Hive and Propertymark have produced this six point guide...
Landlord Action is celebrating 25 years and various notable achievements....
The activist group took to X to criticise Liz Kendall,...
The tenant was in hospital when he was evicted illegally...
The most vulnerable tenants may pay the highest price...
The controversial proposal is backed by the Welsh Government...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The courts will have to handle a significant increase in...
Taxes and spending cuts are set to be on the...
The Spring Statement comes up this Wednesday...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here