A small proportion of private landlords grab the spotlight because of their poor treatment of tenants and properties – yet figures suggest the overall problem is worse in the social housing sector.

An example has come to light this week with the Housing Ombudsman making two findings of severe maladministration following an investigation into Inquilab Housing Association’s failure to respond to a resident’s damp and mould problems.

The resident had reported that the leaks and outstanding repairs meant her daughter’s bedroom was unusable and their belongings were damaged which impacted on their physical and mental health. 

The Housing Ombudsman’s investigation found the resident had been reporting issues since early 2018. An independent inspection report had recommended various repairs after highlighting issues including a leak in the bathroom and a damp bedroom wall. 

There is no evidence to show that the works were completed or an action plan produced, leaving the repairs outstanding for at least two years.   

The Ombudsman says the social landlord failed to meet its repair obligations as well as its obligations to keep the property free from damp and mould. It did not demonstrate how this failure contributed to the damaged belongings and whether it should have offered redress. It also failed to assess the appropriate level of redress for the loss of one of the bedrooms due to the mould. 

“There was no evidence of any investigation of the complaint by the landlord or any complaint responses being issued. The landlord did not fully engage in the complaint raised by the resident about the repairs and about the damage to her belongings” says a statement.

Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman, comments: “There were severe failings in this case. The resident had repeatedly contacted the landlord and felt it was not treating her concerns seriously. The landlord did not provide details of its plans to follow up and complete the repairs or to provide her with a reasonable response. It failed to demonstrate an awareness of the detriment which the resident was experiencing by its lack of action and lack of reasonable communication.

 “The landlord failed to engage in the complaint despite prompts from our service so lost opportunities to try and resolve it at a local level which the resident had agreed to. Following our decision, I welcome the landlord’s response on its learning from this case and the changes being made to improve its service. I would encourage other landlords to consider the learning this case offers for their own services.”  

The Housing Ombudsman made two findings of severe maladministration – for the landlord’s response to the repair requests and for its complaint handling. 

It ordered the landlord to pay a total of £3,633 compensation, provide a detailed schedule of works to deal with all the outstanding repairs, discuss the scale of the damage to the resident’s possessions and offer redress to reflect this, and conduct a senior management review into the case, including why it failed to carry out the required repairs at the property and failed to raise and respond to a formal complaint despite multiple interventions by the Ombudsman.