The Law Society of England and Wales has welcomed the proposal for tenants facing eviction to receive enhanced legal assistance.
“It would be a welcome step to make non-means tested legal advice available to those facing repossession before their case actually ends up in court” says Law Society president I. Stephanie Boyce.
“While having the option of additional advice on welfare benefits and debt is an added bonus. We cannot underestimate the value of early legal advice as it can help address problems before they escalate, preventing cases from going to court unnecessarily.
“However, this well-intentioned move may well be hampered by the desperate shortage of legal aid-funded solicitors with the relevant expertise in large swathes of the country which has created housing legal aid deserts, affecting millions of people. Those facing repossession will not be able to access vital legal advice if there is no legal aid provider in their area.
“While the funding commitments announced in the Autumn Budget were a welcome step in the right direction, much more investment is needed to ensure legal representation is available to those without the means to pay for it.
“Legal advice must be available to all tenants facing the loss of their homes, particularly when homelessness is a likely outcome. We welcome these proposals but are concerned that the scheme cannot function if the lack of legal aid providers is not addressed.”
The Ministry of Justice has sent out for consultation proposals for an enhancement of the existing Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme.
Specifically the MoJ wants:
- to remodel and rebrand it to become a new Housing Loss Prevention Advice Service (HLPAS), incorporating both the existing service of advice and representation at court but also early legal advice before court;
- expanding the scope of legal aid so that HLPAS providers can offer early legal advice on social welfare law matters to individuals facing procession proceedings;
- contracts for individual courts rather than larger geographical areas;
- allowing providers to claim for the court duty fee in addition to a Legal Help fee for follow on work;
- introducing a set attendance fee for all schemes, replacing the existing nil session payment.
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
I am sure everyone reading this article will be surprised the Law Society is in favour of of an increase in clients, providing of course Legal Aid fees are increased.
So the Law Society members can milk the system further, and they talk about greedy Landlords, bit rich isn't it ?
Shall I vote to cream even more Tax-payers money, Hmm, difficult one !!!
For sure if I get any more charges for anything, the rental price will go up PLUS my 15% administration fee.
So - the only losers for this are the tenants. And I say, tough s**t to them. And it is of course their fault.
If they cannot pay, then they should not rent it.
Please login to comment