By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


£60,000 bill for landlord leaving tenants in “atrocious conditions”

A landlord who harassed tenants and left them in dangerous accommodation hit has been branded “atrocious” and has been hit with a £50,000 bill by a London council.

Arbab Ahmed was brought to book on 10 housing violations at Stratford Magistrates Court by Waltham Forest council, in a case that has been running for two and a half years.

Ahmed let two properties – one a shop premises with minimal residential adaptations made – in Leyton. They were unlicensed, and infested with rodents.


A second defendant - Eden Homes who acted as Ahmed’s managing agent - has also been fined.

Property licensing officers from the council visited the premises in June 2019 after a complaint by a tenant. Ahmed harassed the tenant by arranging for their gas meter to be removed, leaving the household without heating or hot water.

A council probe found 30 faults and the upstairs flat being rented out), with up to six men sharing the cramped property, including two in the tiny attic.

The property was arranged as two flats, and in addition to the poorly adapted shop which was occupied by one family, there was a second flat that extended over three floors with a poorly constructed and part-completed rear extension and a ladder providing access to the attic space which had just been boarded and carpeted for use as a makeshift bedroom.

The officer also found evidence that the house was infested with rodents, inadequate locks to the ground floor flat, cracked tiles in the bathrooms, leaking waste pipes to the ground floor bathroom, defective smoke alarm to the ground floor hallway, a faulty boiler and lack of fire doors.

A month after the first visit a Prohibition Order was served to prohibit the use of the ground floor commercial unit as residential accommodation, and an Interim Management Order was made in respect of the first floor flat allowing the council to take full management control. 

Under the IMO Ahmed was forbidden to access the property or contact, harass or bully the tenants living in it.

By October he was charged with seven offences including failure to licence a property contrary to Section 95(1) of the Housing Act.

He was also found to have flouted the IMO and was kept in custody for a seven-day period as part of a separate action in 2019.

The recent case was heard in his absence. 

Eden Homes pleaded guilty to three charges and were sentenced. 

Finding Ahmed guilty of all 10 charges, District Judge William Nelson called the defendant “duplicitous” and said he “deceived multiple tenants”. He also commented on the premises being in “an atrocious condition”, adding “nobody should be in a house where they are sleeping next to rodent droppings”.



The judge fined Ahmed £45,000.  He also said the defendant should pay the council’s costs of £14,404.08.

Centaurus Estates (trading as Eden Homes) had previously pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing and were fined £3,700 with a Victim Surcharge of £180 and also ordered to pay £1,557.76 towards the council’s costs.

A local authority spokeswoman says: “Arbab Ahmed is among the worst of the worst landlords that our team has ever encountered – and the District Judge certainly agreed.

“The tenants in his property were living in appalling, dangerous and unsanitary conditions, and when they raised complaints, they were harassed by the landlord as he tried to avoid taking responsibility for his actions.

“We will always use the full extent of our powers to crack down on landlords who try to exploit their tenants, but cases like this show once again the very real need to ensure that landlords are registered, so that people like Ahmed are stopped from treating innocent people in this way.”

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    Welcome to the future PRS as these will be the only landlords left once the rest of us have been pushed out.

  • icon

    Tenants have been treated badly but the money goes to the government/local government. If this is a new cash cow for local authorities, incentives are in the wrong place.


    The vast majority of tenants are not treated badly but there again they don't deserve to be treated badly and usually end up with the sort of decent landlords they deserve.

    If some decent tenants can only find sub standard properties owned by rogue landlords, then the "activists" who want to harm decent tenants and landlords alike are just as much to blame as the rogue landlords.

    A healthy supply of decent properties for let would mean no decent tenants having to be at the mercy of a rogue landlord in a slum property. Insufficient availability of good landlords and rental properties is largely the fault of Shelter, Generation Rant etc. and forces ssome undeserving tenants into slums which should be reserved for rent dodgers etc.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up