x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Controversial Labour council extends landlord licensing regime

A Labour city council that has already called for powers to impose rent controls has now extended its existing landlord licensing scheme to three additional wards.

Bristol - whose Mayor made the call for rent controls earlier this year - has extended additional licensing to Brislington West, Bedminster and Horfield wards, and selective licensing to Brislington West and Bedminster only. 

The council claims this follows what it calls the “success” of earlier licensing schemes.

Advertisement

Councillor Tom Renhard, Cabinet Member for Housing Delivery and Homes, says: “We take the wellbeing of people renting properties across the city very seriously and we want everyone to feel confident that their home is safe and fit for habitation.

“Property licensing is one of a number of tools we are using to make sure all rented properties in the city are up to a certain standard.

“Living in a home that is in poor condition, or being badly managed, can have a significant negative impact on the health and wellbeing of tenants.

“Although most private landlords provide a good standard of accommodation and service to their tenants, many do not. Some houses are in poor condition and poorly managed, with a significant number let to vulnerable tenants who are unaware of their rights or are not aware of the minimum standards of accommodation their landlord should provide.

“We are clear that the small minority of rogue landlords and property agents who knowingly flout their legal obligations, rent out accommodation which is substandard and harass their tenants, should be prevented from managing or letting housing.

“We will continue to lead the way in doing what we can to protect and empower people living in privately rented housing, including having a strong voice nationally to hold government to account on the long-delayed renters reform bill.

“We would encourage all landlords to apply for the relevant licenses and to work with us to help protect vulnerable tenants and make people across the city more comfortable in their homes.”

The council has also taken another step to help protect renters in the city, making it easier to add rogue landlords to a national database.

The Labour-dominated council recently voted to approve a new policy that will allow it to add landlords into the government’s Rogue Landlord database when a banning order has been issued against the landlord, and decide how long they should be on the database for. The length of a ban can range from two years up to an indefinite or lifetime ban.

Landlords have until July 5 to submit their applications and pay their fee. A licence will normally last for five years and conditions will be attached to the licence to ensure that minimum property standards are met and that good management practice is delivered.

Advice and guidance on the necessary improvements required to ensure the property complies with licensing conditions is also offered. All licensed properties are inspected to ensure they meet licensing and minimum housing standards.  Where landlords do not meet the required condition standards, enforcement action may follow.

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    As long as the tenants can afford the fee and the landlords time costs to be added to their rent, then it’s a zero sum game.

  • icon

    Simon, that’s to crux of the matter not a penny can be passed on to the Tenants they can’t afford it some currently asking me for reductions when my rents are well below the market. The LL is expected to absorb all costs which is not possible therefore its designed to Bankrupt him, it’s not a white paper they have prepared but a black paper the next won’t be green but red.

    icon

    Michael

    The clue is in the words "Market rents".

    If your tenants can't or won't pay them, go to the market and get new tenants.

     
    icon

    If they cannot afford the rent then they need to be looking for a cheaper property in a cheaper area, there's no shortage of working tenants that can and will afford to pay market rents.

     
    icon

    Michael. All licencing costs, and the associated other costs that came with them, have been passed onto my tenants. Ditto tenant fee ban costs, electrical inspections, S24 etc. I have a detailed spreadsheet with all the costs of government meddling over the years. I know all the other landlords in the area. We're all in the same boat so all rents rise accordingly (market rents). As mentioned in another post today, it's all bleeding obvious!

     
  • icon

    Strange, Bristol, ultra left wing, ie communist ?

    icon

    A city where criminal damage is no longer a crime!

     
  • icon

    I don't understand why you need licencing. If the idea is to ensure the condition of the property is suitable, surely if the tenant can't get the landlord to make the improvement, they report it to the council. If the tenant is vulnerable they should have support anyway. I guess it's a way for the council to make extra money.

    How about a rogue tenant database?

  • icon

    No Grumpy Doug sorry would love to agree but in reality the increased costs haven’t been passed on, or there would be far more homeless. Tenants for
    the most part have limited income, so we can’t add on ever increasing costs, you can’t get blood out of a stone.

    icon

    There is a growing shortage of property to rent - so no need to stick with those who can no longer afford market rents.

     
  • icon

    Robert I understand all that in theory but in practice its different. We are not allowed control of management anymore that has been taken away. We just have to pretend we are in control of management or we get fined for poor management that have been left no instrument to effect authority. OK suppose I attempt change of Tenants I can’t use Section 8 it’s not rent arrears, can’t use S,21 because its been compromised takes months and costs thousands, open another can of worms to add insult to injury, they are likely to get the hump and stop paying on the interim as well.

    icon

    Michael, I sympathise and you are clearly a considerate person who wants to look after your tenants. But you are a business, not a charity. Your tenants will be paying increased costs for literally everything else - and they will pay that because they know they will not get a sympathetic ear. Food, fuel, utilities, entertainment, clothes, all going up but they won’t be trying to negotiate for these things because nobody will listen. So why should you be any different?

    You don’t have to reach market value but you need to stay near it. In 10 years, rents will be double what they are now, and you wouldn’t expect to be charging todays prices then. But if you’re not periodically increasing you’ll be stuck with the same tenants, under paying you because you let them.

    As for your comment above asking how you can go about it - you put the rent up to a figure you think is fair. If they’re not paying, that becomes rent arrears, and then you can go from there. I know from speaking to my letting agent, tenants will grumble but most of the time they will accept an increase because they only have to look on Rightmove to see what they might end up paying if they move.

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up