By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Tory MP backs tighter rules on Airbnbs and other short lets

A Conservative MP who has already suggested a 25 mile limit around some rental properties to reserve them for people with local connections, is now backing a clampdown on Airbnbs and other short lets.

Simon Jupp, MP for East Devon, says short lets help support tourist economies in areas such as his, and provide income for some ordinary householders letting out a room. But he insists a balance is to be struck.

“Homes to buy and for long-term rent are out of reach for many people who grew up in Devon, work locally, or need the support of family to look after a loved one” Jupp writes in a column in the Sidmouth Herald.


He says recent changes to laws - the higher rates of stamp duty on additional properties, closing tax loopholes and plans to let local authorities double council tax on vacant second homes - are not sufficient by themselves. 

Jupp says he backs the government’s review into the impact of Airbnbs and other short lets, and believes there are good suggestions coming through already.

“Measures being considered include a registration kitemark scheme with spot checks for compliance with rules such as gas safety, and physical checks of premises to ensure regulations in areas including health and safety, noise, and anti-social behaviour are obeyed” he writes.

And he concludes by saying that landlords and second-home owners who see property as an investment opportunity also make it harder for local people to have a home of their own. 

“We clearly need a better balance for communities in East Devon and the South West” he claims.

Jupp’s idea on a 25 mile limit for certain rental properties would mean that a tenant would have to meet one of the following conditions: they currently live or work within 25 miles of the property; they were born within 25 miles of the property; or they can demonstrate a ‘care network’ within 25 miles of the property.

“It would permanently protect a percentage of any new housing stock from second-home ownership, giving local families an opportunity to own or rent a home in places where prices are increasingly out of reach and often being sold to cash-buyers from elsewhere” he says.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Any politician needs to understand property is cyclical and is largely driven by tax policy.

    Right now the taxation on holiday lets is far more favourable than on traditional BTL. Therefore we suddenly have a vast amount of holiday lets and a shortage of long term rentals.

    If landlords of long term BTLs weren't viewed as the first port of call for extra tax every time politicians wanted a sound bite policy we wouldn't have such a housing crisis.

  • icon

    Jo- well said, but will the government see it in time to avoid a tsunami of homeless? I doubt it.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up