x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Shocking new figures offer one reason why rental sector is so strong

New housing affordability figures provide one underlying reason why many potential buyers cannot make the move and instead rely increasingly on the private rental sector.

New figures from the government show that in 2022, in England, the average house price was £275,000 and the average annual disposable household income was £33,000 – so houses cost 8.4 times income. 

The official government affordability threshold is 5.0 times earnings – and we have been above this since 2017.

Advertisement

Now in England, only the top 10 per cent of households can afford an average home with fewer than the ‘affordable’ five years of income – it’s the top 30 per cent in Wales and top 40% in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The situation is even worse in some regions. In London, the average property is 13.9 times the average income. In the South East it’s 9.8 times, in the East of England 9.3 and in the South West 8.9 times.

Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at business consultancy Hargreaves Lansdown, says: “Runaway house prices made a mockery of housing affordability in 2022. While mortgage rates were low, this kind of financial contortion was feasible, but now people are facing remortgaging at much higher rates, it’s going to be incredibly painful.

“Housing hasn’t been affordable since 2017, according to the Office for National Statistics, and rampant price rises during the pandemic didn’t help. Lower mortgage rates helped people to stretch their finances to bigger loans. However, with 1.4m people remortgaging at a much higher rate this year, it’s going to bring real pain to hundreds of thousands of people.

“When a household spends 25 per cent of its after-tax income on the mortgage, it’s considered to be at risk of falling behind on payments” says Cole, warning that a Hargreaves Lansdown forecast suggests that over the next year, 26 per cent of people will be in this position.”

Another analyst - Karen Noye, mortgage expert at Quilter - adds: “This situation [in England] will now be even worse as these calculations do not take into account any effects on housing cost affordability resulting from changes to mortgage interest rates and payments stretching people’s budgets that much further leaving with even less to save towards a deposit to buy a property.

“The impact of this huge affordability pressure has already starting to be seen as people are forced to take out marathon mortgages just to be able to afford monthly payments. Data gathered by Quilter from the FCA shows there has been a near 120 per cent uptick in the number of people taking out mortgage terms of 35 years or more. This highlights that more people are being forced to stretch their finances, opting for longer-term mortgages to manage monthly payments amidst climbing interest rates and high house prices. 

“Strikingly, there is a significant increase in older borrowers who will still be repaying their mortgages well into their 70s, potentially diverting a considerable portion of their retirement savings to meet their mortgage obligations.

“Looking forward, the pressures on affordability may lead to a downturn in house prices. The latest house price indices all point to declining or flatlining house prices. However, prices will need to drop considerably or wages increase massively for the affordability ratios to improve. While both are unlikely, the building of new homes to ease the supply and demand dynamic, and help first time buyers is likely to be a central battleground for next year’s election.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    There are 168 hours in every week.

    If you can't afford a house working 35 hours or so, try working a few more hours.

    Incidentally have you seen some of the food stocked on food bank shelves? I didn't know Cadbury Smash was still made - also lots of premium brand processed food on offer instead of budget brands.

    Whatever happened to raw vegetables and fresh fruits? Much cheaper and healthier than processed convenience food.

    icon

    Robert, that is all well and good in your day. But these days tenants have new iPhone subscriptions, gym memberships, smashed advocado on toast at overpriced places like Leon and £3.50 per day latte habits. Everything for them must be new too.

    They don't want to work the full week. It's too much for them. They want to 'work' from home too. Hopefully do a 4 day week like Cambridge Council.

     
    icon

    Nick

    I am so sorry!

    I really should not judge others by my standards and expect young persons ( formerly known as kids, sprogs etc.) to have to live as frugally as I was fully prepared to do 50 years ago whilst saving up for my first house and then my first holiday home and then my first rental property.

    It must be so difficult for the mental health of young persons faced with such a choice of expensive coffees, glasses of wine and artisan breads for their avocado.

    I really hope we taxpayers are providing sufficient expensive counselling and other essential support services!

     
    icon

    Apology accepted.

    Don’t worry there is plenty of support available for these useless lazy dysfunctional people including endless types of benefits, the government, councils, courts, so called charities keeping tenants in their homes (not their properties) no matter what. Breathing Space, scope to claim they have ADHD, anxiety, stress, depression or now that they simply identify themselves as being a cat, dinosaur or the moon and therefore can’t pay rent or be evicted. Anything goes these days. 🆘🆘🛟🛟

     
  • icon

    Robert, even 37 years ago things were difficult when you fled the nest and had bought a house at 20 years old. No holidays with your friends, having to miss many meals when you cant afford food and scrounging lifts to work when you cant afford fuel and working every bit of overtime you could get your hands on.

    I hope that my sacrifices 37 years ago will mean that I do not need to do it again. I'm too old now to be working 72 hours a week

    icon

    Agreed, my first day at work i did 2hrs overtime, we all grabed any overtime or extra work going, we knew by doing so we were bettering ourselves

     
  • icon

    As far as I understand, most people will not get mortgages past 70 years, unless they get there and prove they are working at the age of 70 and after. So I am not sure why article says they will be paying mortgages past their 70's. Before we get to 70, we will have to pay off our residential mortgage, which is only mortgage on a variable rate. All BTL properties are fixed at a lot cheaper rates. If I start working again, then we can re-mortgage the residential. I do not wish to go back to work for someone else. So I am hoping to start my own business, so I can decide on the hours of work. However, to fix the mortgages rate is going to be an expensive now. So it is best to pay it off within a year, whether I work or not.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up