Backfired! Councils LOSE money through second home tax premiums – claim

Backfired! Councils LOSE money through second home tax premiums – claim


Todays other news
Emily Coltman FCA is Chief Accountant at FreeAgent...
Can a landlord database tackle rogue operators, or will it...
There's been a survey of landlords and tenants - with...
The public money is being spent by Sir Sadiq Khan,...
Miniature wooden house with stacks of coins and a percentage block.


A politician is claiming that second home council tax premiums, where owners pay up to double the normal rate, is resulting in financial losses to local authorities.

Advertisement

Janet Finch-Saunders, Member of the Welsh Parliament for Aberconwy, submitted freedom of information requests asking, in relation to the council tax premium on second homes, for the financial losses from property owners switching from council tax to business rates.

Advertisement

She says several authorities have reported losses.

Advertisement

Ceredigion has seen a financial loss of £1m since 2016/17; Conwy has seen a financial loss of £1.8m since 2012/13; Pembrokeshire has seen a financial loss £3.6m of since 2019/20.In a statement on her website, Finch-Saunders says the figures would be higher if it was assumed that the properties switching from second homes to business rates in one financial year, remained qualified for business rates in the following financial years.

Commenting on the impact of the second home premium, she says: “The evidence from West Wales is clear that the second home premium is failing in its claimed aim of delivering more homes for people to live in.

Advertisement

“Authorities such as Conwy, Ceredigion, and Pembrokeshire are seeing high numbers of properties switching to qualify for business rates, rather than pay normal council tax, let alone the premium.

“At a time when local authorities across Wales are struggling financially, it is a major failure of Welsh Government that they have developed a second home policy for local authorities to implement that results in major financial losses.

Advertisement

“I do not doubt that there would now be more properties paying council tax, and money coming in to local authorities, should the second home premiums not have been introduced”.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Big Ben clock tower with Union Jack flag overlay in London.
Rayner resigned from the post 10 months ago - and...
Real estate agent discussing rental property with diverse tenants.
The analysis is of prime rental markets across the UK...
Here's a room by room look at what matters most...
We're just 10 days away from the Renters Rights Act...
The warning says no landlord, anywhere, is immune from the...
Tenants are increasingly discerning, claims the agent...
A prominent agent says he’s expecting a “significant shift” in...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Emily Coltman FCA is Chief Accountant at FreeAgent...
Can a landlord database tackle rogue operators, or will it...
There's been a survey of landlords and tenants - with...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.