Landlord fined for failing to provide documents to council

Landlord fined for failing to provide documents to council


Todays other news
A long term rise in the number of young people...
The claim comes from property comparison service Compare My Move...
Some 60% of the UK housing stock needs improved energy...


The landlord of a suspected HMO has been fined for not producing tenancy agreements and bank statements relating to tenants.

Daria Smith, the co-owner of a property in Swindon, pleaded guilty to not complying with a Section 235 Notice, which is a breach of Section 236 (1) of the Housing Act 2004.

Smith was sent a notice demanding that she produce tenancy agreements and bank statements for any occupiers of her property.

The notice was sent after a prospective buyer of the home contacted Swindon council stating the property was occupied by six tenants as a licensable HMO, without such a licence being place.

An investigating officer from the council then visited unannounced and spoke with one of the tenants who said there were six people living there and he wasn’t related to any of them.

Witness statements were taken from two other occupiers. Both statements confirmed six people lived in the property and they were not related to one another. 

The property has six bedrooms with a shared kitchen and bathroom and is therefore it is believed mandatory HMO licensing applies.

The notices to provide tenancy agreements and bank statements were not complied with by the landlord and, shortly after the Section 235 notice was served, the tenants were evicted or left the property.

Smith stated the property had not been rented out as an HMO and had been rented to family and friends. 

After failing to attend two Police and Criminal Evidence Act interviews with the council, notices were served on both registered owners but the case was only pursued against her as the rent is shown as being transferred to her and witness statements refer to Daria Smith as the landlord.

After pleading guilty at Swindon Magistrates Court to failing to comply with the Section 235 Notice, she was £300 and ordered her to pay £4,022 in court costs.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Scams in nine major cities dominate the findings of a...
People typically over-estimate the cost of retrofitting, a bank claims...
Thew predictions come from two senior PropTech figures...
The study involves a university, a council and a specialist...
The tenant was in hospital when he was evicted illegally...
The controversial proposal is backed by the Welsh Government...
A mortgage chief is warning that thousands of buy to...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
A long term rise in the number of young people...
The claim comes from property comparison service Compare My Move...
Some 60% of the UK housing stock needs improved energy...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here