x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Loophole means Section 21 Ban Delay “is not what it seems” - claim

A prominent PropTech supplier claims the government’s pledge to delay the ban on Section 21 evictions until court processes have been reviewed and if necessary upgraded, is “not what it seems.”

Goodlord’s Oli Sherlock says: "As the [Renters Reform] Bill currently stands, it seems that the apparent promise to delay the scrapping of Section 21 to allow for court reform is not what it seems. 

“Instead, it appears that the market will be delivered a fragmented process which sees some tenancies permitting Section 21, some not, and others that could fall into either camp depending on how a tenancy renewal is handled. 

Advertisement

“This would all be taking place alongside an investigation into the courts, which currently has no confirmed timeline or identifiable metrics for success. The deep irony here is that the very same courts will be managing more and more cases deriving from tenancies where section 21 has already been outlawed. Arguably this is the worst outcome for all parties.”

Sherlock, working with Ryan Heaven - a solicitor at Dutton Gregory Solicitors - says there is a loophole in the Bill which means that one type of tenancy, only one of which will still allow for the enforcement of Section 21. 

Heaven insists that despite a pledge from Housing Secretary Michael Gove that S21 will have been banned by the time the country goes to the polls in a General Election, it seems highly unlikely that this will prove to be the case. 

“A lot of people place emphasis on Michael Gove stating that section 21 would be 'outlawed' before the election, but when you examine the Bill closer this is not what will happen; whenever the election date is there will be some landlords in this country who will still be able to serve a section 21 notice even if it others are not able to”  Heaven says.

The three are:

- A new tenancy created after the Bill has been implemented - That means you can't serve a Section 21 notice. 

- Any fixed-term tenancy that becomes periodic once the Bill has been implemented - Landlords would still be able to serve a Section 21 notice until the tenancy switches over to a periodic one. However, once that happens, the new rules apply and you can’t serve a section 21.

- Tenancies that are periodic when the Bill is implemented - For these tenancies, landlords will still be able to serve a Section 21 until the Government reviews the Court system, reports on it to parliament, and then sets an ‘extended implementation date’ at which date the new rules all apply to all tenancies. As such, tenancies which fall into this category could be served a Section 21 notice after the election.

The loophole was discussed at a recent PropTech webinar, which you can see a recording of here: https://www.goodlord.co/newsagent/webinars/experts-react-the-renters-reform-bill-third-reading?hsLang=en

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    We have all heard the above before. However, what is not being clarified is precisely what Labour is going to do about the staging of the abolition of Section 21.

    Are they going to stagger its abolition at all? They have said many times that Section 21 evictions will be abolished on their first day in office - "no ifs and no buts".

  • Sarah Fox-Moore

    All my current Tenancies are Periodic so whiist ever they remain nothing changes for me, which is great.... But as and when they leave, the bar any new Tenants will have to pass will be so high theyll need breathing apparatus.

    icon

    I have a property which has been empty for nearly two months. Plenty of good gold plated applicants but I will now only take the solid gold individuals, and then only with a solid gold guarantor.
    PS Hundreds of benefit applicants who do not stand a chance.

     
    icon

    In the House of Lords debate yesterday, a Labour peer was saying that the situation of families having the threat of Section 21 still hanging over their heads was unacceptable, so I wouldn't hold your breath that existing tenancies will still have the option of Section 21 under a Labour Government.

     
  • icon

    Effectively, this will result in LL’s being more than reluctant to sign up new tenants, so property will remain vacant in the face of huge demand or LL’s will simply sell up.

    icon

    You have perfectly summed up the situation.

     
  • icon

    The Maluku, you’ll be lucky to find someone that’s not on it, there was enough in London to elect the Mayor.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up