Labour may be worse than Tories for private renters – claim

Labour may be worse than Tories for private renters – claim


Todays other news
Damp & Mould Action and Awareness Week is returning for...
People can own their individual flats or units and collectively...
These ideas from a holiday lets expert at insurance company...
Few councils appear to have taken action against landlords over...
Furnishings and fixtures in rental properties are wearing out 30%...

A prominent journalist, well known for her articles championing renters’ rights, says tenants could be worse off under Labour than they were under the Conservatives.

Vicky Spratt, housing correspondent at the i newspaper, writes: “Under the stewardship of [Chancellor Rachel] Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the class and intergenerational inequality that came to define the experience of living in the United Kingdom during 14 years of Conservative governments looks like it will only get worse.”

Spratt cites recent government decisions to prevent some under-22 year olds from claiming a health top-up on Universal Credit and the failure to increase the Local Housing Allowance despite rising rents. She contrasts those with the government’s decision not to move away from the so-called triple lock for pensioners. 

And she dismisses the extra £2 billion, announced this week for affordable housing, as a mere “drop in the ocean” because it will fund only 18,000 new social and affordable homes.

As a result, Spratt analyses the government’s approach like this: “Labour’s welfare changes mean that even the wealthiest State Pension recipients will see their state support increase by more than low-income renters, or unwell and disabled people who are struggling to make ends meet.”

Separately, activist group Generation Rent has also been sharply critical of the Spring Statement’s welfare reforms.

It says: “Pushing people into poverty doesn’t help them to escape it. Never has and it never will. Government plans to reduce the number of people who can claim Personal Independence Payments, while limit Universal Credit for those under 22, will drive people into debt, poverty and homelessness. 

“Forcing people into poverty will be expensive for the taxpayer too. The cost will simply shift. Councils will have to provide temporary accommodation at eye-watering rates and the impact on health will add to pressures on the NHS. We urge the government to reverse these proposals to cut welfare spending.”

You can see Vicky Spratt’s full article here, although for some readers it will be behind a paywall.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
"We’re concerned thousands of criminal landlords will dodge the new...
The survey looked at landlords managing some 2,000 properties...
he government has announced plans to train 18,000 retrofit professionals...
The most vulnerable tenants may pay the highest price...
A consultant says councils are becoming sharper at licensing enforcement...
A tax rise coming in just five weeks’ time will...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Damp & Mould Action and Awareness Week is returning for...
People can own their individual flats or units and collectively...
These ideas from a holiday lets expert at insurance company...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here