Landlord hit with hefty fine for HMO repair problems

Landlord hit with hefty fine for HMO repair problems


Todays other news
Damp & Mould Action and Awareness Week is returning for...
People can own their individual flats or units and collectively...
These ideas from a holiday lets expert at insurance company...
Few councils appear to have taken action against landlords over...
Furnishings and fixtures in rental properties are wearing out 30%...

A landlord has been hit with a bill of more than £16,000 for multiple disrepair and other issues at an HMO.

Patrick Duggan, of Liverpool, was found guilty of breaching HMO Management Regulations and HMO licensing conditions at Sefton Magistrates’ Court.

Liverpool council inspected the property in 2023, identifying numerous breaches of the Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006. These include issues with fire safety, structural defects with the boundary wall and multiple disrepair issues including damp and mould.

Duggan also failed to provide relevant documentation within a specified timeframe to the Council, in breach of HMO licensing conditions.

Following a trial in January, where a magistrates’ bench reviewed the facts of the case and heard evidence, District Judge James Clark sentenced Duggan after he was found guilty by the bench of 12 charges.

District Judge Clark commented that Duggan did have mechanisms in place with respect to the management of the building, but that they were ultimately insufficient. The property is no longer rented out.

The council says this is merely the latest case it has brought to court. 

In 2024, a total of 33 prosecutions and fines worth £342,584 were secured, and a further 11 Civil Penalty Notices were issued, with fines totalling £59,862.

A council spokesperson says: “We want to work with landlords to help them meet the conditions of their license, but where they won’t we will take enforcement action, including taking cases to court if necessary. This property really was not fit for human habitation so I am pleased that it is no longer being offered for rent.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
He's been ordered to pay £2,710 after being found guilty...
Agents must report suspicions to the Office of Financial Sanctions...
he government has announced plans to train 18,000 retrofit professionals...
From May 29 - that’s just over two weeks from...
The most vulnerable tenants may pay the highest price...
A consultant says councils are becoming sharper at licensing enforcement...
A tax rise coming in just five weeks’ time will...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Damp & Mould Action and Awareness Week is returning for...
People can own their individual flats or units and collectively...
These ideas from a holiday lets expert at insurance company...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here