Rogue landlord left tenant without heating and hot water for a year 

Rogue landlord left tenant without heating and hot water for a year 


Todays other news
Agents must report suspicions to the Office of Financial Sanctions...
he government has announced plans to train 18,000 retrofit professionals...
Only low levels of awareness of the Making Tax Digital...
‘Call Before You Serve’ aims to reduce incidents of homelessness...

A London landlord has been fined over £5,000 after leaving tenants without heating or hot water and ignoring safety rules.

Enfield resident Rosa Giddy, who pleaded guilty, was prosecuted at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court for failing to comply with the requirements of an abatement notice under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

An investigation by Enfield council found that tenants at her HMO in Edmonton were left without heating and hot water because she failed to repair a gas boiler that was defective for approximately one year.

Her neglect not only breached housing regulations, but posed significant health risks to the tenants, particularly during the winter months.

Furthermore, Giddy failed to produce documents required under Section 236(1) of the Housing Act 2004, which requires landlords to supply relevant documentation upon request by an investigating council.

In this case, the landlord did not provide gas and electricity safety certificates when asked by Enfield council. It was this failure that further compounded Giddy’s disregard for compliance and an unwillingness to cooperate with the local authority.

A council spokesperson says: “Despite multiple warnings from the council, the landlord failed to take the necessary actions to remedy the situation, demonstrating a blatant disregard for her legal obligations as a landlord.

“Her actions and inactivity showed a lack of concern for the welfare of her tenants which could have had catastrophic consequences.

“This case is a reminder to all landlords of their legal obligations to address deficiencies in their rented properties, and the importance of adhering to housing standards and regulations.”

The property is no longer operating as an HMO and the landlord will not be considered a ‘Fit and Proper Person’ to hold a licence if they decide to re-let the property.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Subscribe to comments
Notify of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Agents must report suspicions to the Office of Financial Sanctions...
he government has announced plans to train 18,000 retrofit professionals...
From May 29 - that’s just over two weeks from...
The warning comes from a commercial property lawyer...
The most vulnerable tenants may pay the highest price...
A consultant says councils are becoming sharper at licensing enforcement...
A tax rise coming in just five weeks’ time will...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
HMOs are increasingly popular with landlords because of their high...
‘Grey belt’ land is a subset of green belt identified...
Barclays gives a state of the nation housing report every...
Sponsored Content
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here