Cut price fee for tenants may trigger rent rise challenges 

Cut price fee for tenants may trigger rent rise challenges 


Todays other news
The area’s high concentration of flats appears to have amplified...
That’s according to Handelsbanken’s fifth annual Property Investor Report....
59% say they are tightening tenant selection criteria...
Lower average house prices and rising letting income combine to...
Searches for ‘London’ fell 14% and searches for London postcode...

Tenants will be able to instigate tribunal challenges to proposed rent rises for a mere £47 it’s been revealed. 

The charge for applications to appeal a rent increase is one of the lowest across the court service and also comes without a ‘hearing fee’ for challenges.  

The Renters Rights Act gives tenants new and greater powers to challenge rent increases, which will in any case be permitted once a year.

Such a rise must be made via a section 13 notice and must be in line with the local market rate. 

The National Residential Landlords Association says even if the claim is unsuccessful rent payments cannot be backdated, meaning that – other than the low £47 fee – there is no disincentive for tenant to challenge proposed increases. 

The cut price deal for tenants was announced by the Ministry of Justice in a response to a written question from Labour MP Kerry McCarthy.

Junior justice minister Sarah Sackman told McCarthy: “The government has laid legislation to begin the process of implementing a new fees framework in the Property Chamber.  

“The purpose of the new framework is to deliver a fair and sustainable Property Chamber that is accessible to all. 

“The framework includes a fee of £47 for applications to appeal a rent increase, with no hearing fee – this is one of the lowest fees across HMCTS.” 

In addition those who cannot afford to mount a challenge will get public cash to help them. 

She said: “The Help with Fees scheme will always be available to provide financial support to those who cannot afford to pay fees.”   

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The penalties totalled over £42,000...
The rate of arrears growth has slowed, suggesting a gradual...
The landlord did not resolve the hazards which were identified...
The tirade was an attempt to force the tenant out...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Jonathan Dinsdale is a senior associate in the Thames Valley...
Landlords warn anti-PRS rhetoric risks driving more investors out of...
Justice for Property Rights urges ministers to adopt a balanced,...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.