You can’t make money from flipping any more

You can’t make money from flipping any more


Todays other news
The area’s high concentration of flats appears to have amplified...
That’s according to Handelsbanken’s fifth annual Property Investor Report....
59% say they are tightening tenant selection criteria...
Lower average house prices and rising letting income combine to...
Searches for ‘London’ fell 14% and searches for London postcode...

The share of homes bought and resold within 12 months – commonly referred to as ‘flipping’ – has plummeted to its lowest level in more than a decade.  

These properties are typically bought with the intention of being renovated and sold on at a profit.  

But HM Land Registry data shows that in 2025, just 1.5% of all transactions across England & Wales were flipped, down from 2.0% in 2024.  

This marks the continuation of a long slowdown that began shortly after the introduction of the second home stamp duty (SDLT) surcharge in 2016, during which the number of flipped homes has halved, from 21,520 in 2016 to just 10,570 in 2025.  

Initially set at 3%, the surcharge was later raised to 5% in 2024, further eroding the returns that flipped properties once generated.

Lettings agency Hamptons, in a detailed analysis of how flipping has effectively died out, says that in 2015, just one year before the second home surcharge was introduced, the average post-SDLT gross profit on a flipped home stood at £36,500.  

This gross profit is defined as the difference between the resale price and the original purchase price, after deducting the upfront stamp duty paid.  

By 2025, this had fallen to £16,390, representing a 55.1% decline. These calculations do not include typical refurbishment costs, suggesting that only a minority of flipped properties ultimately deliver a net profit.

As of 2025, 73.3% of flipped homes generated a gross profit.  However, once SDLT is accounted for, this figure falls to 58.7%, down from a peak of 85.9% in 2006.    

Consequently, in 2025, SDLT charges accounted for 43% of gross profit (the difference between the sale and purchase prices), equivalent to £12,400 on the average flip.  Profits briefly picked up during the pandemic due to the SDLT holiday but have since declined.          

Returns across the regions

The decline in flipping profitability since 2015 has varied sharply by region, with the steepest falls concentrated in the South of England, where weaker house price growth and higher stamp duty costs have dented returns.

Change in gross profit after SDLT costs by region

Year201520242025Since 2015YoY
London£100,570£65,950£35,720-64.5%-45.8%
South East£45,780£15,900£9,900-78.4%-37.7%
South West£33,270£19,180£6,560-80.3%-65.8%
East of England£44,870£17,840£16,600-63.0%-6.9%
East Midlands£23,580£14,430£12,080-48.8%-16.2%
West Midlands£22,640£20,590£12,440-45.0%-39.6%
North East£13,450£16,240£17,08027.0%5.1%
North West£23,740£26,490£23,280-1.9%-12.1%
Yorkshire & Humber£18,930£14,970£13,260-30.0%-11.4%
England & Wales£36,500£21,940£16,390-55.1%-25.3%

Source: Hamptons & Land Registry

What sets a profitable flipped property apart from a non-profitable one?

Properties priced below £100,000 were the most likely to turn a profit in 2025, with 86% doing so.  This fell sharply to just 28% of properties bought for more than £350,000.  

This predominantly reflects stronger house price growth across Northern regions where lower‑priced properties are concentrated.          

Returns follow a similar pattern.  Investors in the sub-£100,000 bracket achieved average gains of 45.8%, while returns turned negative for purchases above £350,000 (table 3).  In total, 88.8% of all flipped properties were bought for less than £350k.

The share of properties which made a gross profit after SDLT on a flip by initial purchase price band (England)

Purchase Price:£0-£100,000£100,001-£200,000£200,001-£350,000£350,001+
Made a profit86%68%37%28%
Average return45.8%19.4%4.7%-4.5%

Source: Hamptons & Land Registry                                                                                  

Aneisha Beveridge, Head of Research at Hamptons, says: “There was a time when rundown properties could be bought cheaply, refurbished, and resold at a healthy margin.  Today, however, second home stamp duty absorbs nearly half of all gross profits, significantly eroding returns.

“The surcharge was not primarily intended to penalise ‘house flipping’; its primary aim was to support first‑time buyers.  While it has largely succeeded in that goal, it has left flipping unviable across much of the South of England.  

“These projects deliver much-needed move-in-ready homes, sparing buyers the financial risks and expertise to undertake major works themselves.

“But stamp duty is only part of the challenge.  Falling house prices across many Southern markets have squeezed returns further, while the cost of materials and labour have risen sharply since the pandemic.  

“Even before factoring in stamp duty, refurbishment budgets now stretch much further than they once did, pushing profit margins to their thinnest levels in over a decade.

“In contrast, the North – particularly the North East – has remained far more resilient.  Lower entry prices keep stamp duty bills modest, meaning more scope to add value through refurbishment.  Combined with strong local house price growth, this has created a rare pocket of the country where flipping can still deliver healthy returns.

“Unless a flip is supported by strong underlying house price growth, turning a profit is becoming increasingly difficult.  That said, investing in relatively cheaper property in an area where house price growth is strong can still yield solid returns.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
That’s according to Handelsbanken’s fifth annual Property Investor Report....
59% say they are tightening tenant selection criteria...
Searches for ‘London’ fell 14% and searches for London postcode...
Yopa analysed average monthly house price growth between 2016 and...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Jonathan Dinsdale is a senior associate in the Thames Valley...
Landlords warn anti-PRS rhetoric risks driving more investors out of...
Justice for Property Rights urges ministers to adopt a balanced,...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.