x

Franklin I

Landlord

2097 Profile Views

About Me

Property investor and Landlord

my expertise in the industry

Property
BTL
Investments

Franklin's Recent Activity

Once bitten twice shy.

From: Franklin I 15 April 2024 09:06 AM

The issue of tenants sharing accommodations with friends poses significant legal implications for LLs. While entering into a joint tenancy agreement with two tenants is permissible, introducing a third party creates distinct households within the property, thereby classifying it as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) necessitating a license. Failure to obtain such licensing can result in substantial fines imposed on LLs, even if they are unaware of the presence of the third party. Additionally, tenants sharing with friends may circumvent proper legal procedures. In instances where breaches are exposed, such as through "Right to Rent" checks, LLs may incur fines of up to £10,000. Consequently, there is a pressing need for the government to establish accountability measures for tenants in such scenarios.

From: Franklin I 06 April 2024 12:33 PM

BTL Repossessions have gone up 56% and here with have another expert speaking up for LLs.

From: Franklin I 04 April 2024 07:14 AM

Before considering sending LLs to prison, it's paramount to implement the aforementioned measures. Currently, LLs are figuratively imprisoned by the plethora of government regulations, legislation, and tax implications imposed on them. What's needed is not a "get out of jail free card" but a fair and balanced regulatory framework. Also, before even contemplating the notion of incarcerating landlords, it's essential to establish mandatory mid-term inspections. These inspections would serve as a crucial component in fostering accountability and fairness within the rental sector. By regulating mid-term inspections, we ensure that both LLs and tenants are held to standards that promote habitable living conditions and responsible behaviour. This approach aligns with the principle of addressing issues proactively rather than resorting to punitive measures after the fact. This entails regulating not only LLs but also BTL mortgage lenders, estate agents, and tenants. Everyone involved in the rental ecosystem must be held accountable to ensure a level playing field and foster better practices across the board.

From: Franklin I 28 March 2024 07:56 AM

Prior to any decline in rental rates, we must see corresponding decreases in interest rates to align with market adjustments. Failing this, landlords may encounter challenges in remortgaging, especially if rental income falls below mortgage criteria thresholds. This predicament could ultimately force landlords to consider selling their properties. With a limited supply of rental housing stock, such actions could inevitably lead to upward pressure on rental prices once again.

From: Franklin I 16 March 2024 01:25 AM

These associations and campaign group's are on a different planet. Landlords are appealing to the government to intervene and compel courts to facilitate agreements, thereby securing possession orders and addressing issues such as high interest rates and mortgage arrears. Despite these pleas, it appears that these concerns are not being effectively addressed by the authorities. Landlord's are leaving industry for good, wake up please!

From: Franklin I 16 March 2024 01:11 AM

The opinion expressed by this agent regarding the reduction in CGT from 28% to 24% not incentivising LLs to sell does not represent the views of all PRS LLs in the UK. The PRS market, valued at around £1.2 trillion, is indeed facing challenges that are eroding its value rapidly. LLs have been under significant pressure from various factors such as increasing interest rates, shortfalls in Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates, possession orders, regulations, legislations, added taxes, and a lack of support. The regulatory environment for LLs is perceived as burdensome, while BTL lenders remain largely unregulated. Tenants and even local housing authorities are also seen as lacking in regulation. To sustain a fair and balanced environment moving forward, it may be beneficial if all parties involved in the housing equation, including LLs, lenders, tenants, and housing authorities, are collectively regulated to some extent. This would help create a more level playing field and address the challenges faced by LLs in the PRS market.

From: Franklin I 15 March 2024 09:10 AM

As a LL, I must express my frustration with the recent statements from GenRen. Their critique of the Budget changes, particularly the reduction in CGT, seems to be based on a misunderstanding of the property market and the challenges LLs face. 1. Financial Realities: The role of a LL is not simply to provide housing; it's a business that requires substantial financial commitment and carries significant risk. The CGT reduction from 28% to 24% is a necessary adjustment that recognises the economic pressures on property owners. 2. Market Dynamics: The assertion that the Budget is a "giveaway to LLs" ignores the complex dynamics of the housing market. Encouraging property sales can alleviate the housing crisis by increasing the supply for FTB's, which is beneficial for the overall market. 3. Eviction Misconceptions: GenRen's claim that the CGT cut could lead to mass evictions is an oversimplification. Most LLs value stable, long-term tenancies and resort to eviction only when absolutely necessary. 4. Policy Balance: It's imperative to strike a balance in housing policy that supports both LLs and tenants. Simplistic critiques that don't take into account the full picture are unhelpful and divisive. 5. Exemptions for LLs: Additionally, I would advocate for exemptions in the CGT for landlords who have endured lengthy delays in possession orders, sometimes up to 18 months. This would provide some relief for those LLs who have been unable to regain control of their properties in a timely manner. In conclusion, GenRen’s stance appears totally disconnected from the practical realities of the housing market. It’s essential to recognise that LLs are not just key contributors but also pivotal in maintaining a healthy, functioning rental sector. Policies need to be formulated with a pragmatic approach that supports the sustainability of LLs’ businesses while also considering the needs of renters. Without this balance, the rental sector’s stability is at risk!

From: Franklin I 07 March 2024 11:42 AM

Peter Charles, we're all getting out! It's crucial to note that many local Borough Councils are facing bankruptcy, while LHA rates struggle to keep up. With the Renter's Reform Bill approaching, the dwindling number of landlords could render it ineffective. Immediate action is imperative to tackle these housing challenges; however, the government's recognition of the current situation may lag a decade behind our current understanding.

From: Franklin I 06 March 2024 16:09 PM

It's crucial to understand the real challenges landlords face, beyond mere assertions. The issue extends far beyond rent controls; it's about the burdensome regulations and financial constraints they grapple with daily. Mortgage lenders wield immense power, able to abruptly hike rates or withdraw products, leaving landlords in precarious positions, these lenders are unregulated, whilst the prs landlords are over regulated. Additionally, trying to maintain affordability for tenants within LHA rates becomes untenable when lenders penalise landlords for lower rents. Moreover, the bureaucratic hurdles of UC and possession orders compound these challenges. Furthermore, it's evident that these eco activists are misguided in targeting landlords for exiting the market. Instead of vilifying them, attention should be directed towards the government's failure to provide adequate support and address the systemic issues plaguing the rental sector. Attacking landlords only serves to exacerbate the problem, rather than addressing its root causes. It's time for a more constructive approach that acknowledges the challenges faced by landlords and works towards solutions that benefit both landlords and tenants alike.

From: Franklin I 06 March 2024 09:32 AM

These individuals appear to be somewhat detached from the challenges that landlords currently face. It's conceivable that they expect us to endure until the "Renter's Reform Bill" is enacted. However, when we voice concerns about the impractical eviction policies thereafter, they may assert that we should have issued notices prior to the implementation of the new legislation.

From: Franklin I 29 January 2024 21:59 PM

Why doesn't Bath & North East Somerset council just implement the Landlords Licensing sheme for PRS sector? They've already implemented the HMO Licensing scheme.

From: Franklin I 15 January 2024 07:31 AM

I understand your comments Ellie, and the inconvenience caused. It's a shame that your tenants couldn't grant access for the GSC/engineer. Personally, I've successfully avoided the Tube for over 25 years. I'd like to wish you speedy convalescence!

From: Franklin I 13 January 2024 12:06 PM

Most LLs are fully aware of the renewal for GSC every year. This article needs to focus on the less obvious, which people don't talk about. I am referring to the annual servicing of the MVHR and pressurised hot water cylinders direct/indirect. These systems can cause fire or explosion if neglected. They should be subject to statutory and mandatory requirements, like gas boilers. The Grenfell Tower fire disaster in 2017 showed the failures of building safety and the need for urgent reforms. Don’t risk your property and your tenants’ lives. Hire qualified and reputable engineers to service these systems annually.

From: Franklin I 12 January 2024 13:23 PM

Have they exhausted their ideas for what to write about?"

From: Franklin I 12 January 2024 10:48 AM

Hi Nick, I made the conscious decision to abstain from engaging with their fully managed service due to my awareness of the reputation established through the experiences of previous landlords and documented case studies. My approach was aimed at implementing a more tailored and personalised strategy, which didn't make much difference.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 15:27 PM

Hi Nick, I had legal insurance that covered my eviction process, bailiffs, court fees, legal fees, as well as lost rent. However, when the tenant claimed full unemployment, I couldn't claim loss of rent/damages, simply because zero times zero equals zero, so to speak. I conducted my own investigations because this tenant was working in the hospital and legally claiming Universal Credit (UC), while also attending university as part of her training in the hospital as a nurse or midwife. I contacted UC, and they didn't seem to care. The local council didn't care either. I presented the same evidence to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and got a response within 2 days, after sending emails to UC for 4-5 weeks without reply. The tenant was out within 3 days. In short, the S21 notice served gave the tenant until July 28th, 2023 to vacate, but because of a severe breach, I got the tenant out by June 28th, 2023. I wasn't compensated by UC, and I complained to my local MP, who got a reply from the recently sacked Housing Minister Rachel Maclean, and she was just as useless as UC. I hope this gives you a clearer picture of my experience. Let me know if you have any other questions.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 14:23 PM

Hi Nick, Yes, I have leased a property to a council and managed to regain possession of it. The experience was quite challenging and not something I would wish any landlord to go through. It's important for both parties in a lease agreement to understand and uphold their responsibilities to avoid such situations.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 13:12 PM

Hi Nick, I appreciate your engagement in this discussion. I'd like to clarify a point that seems to have caused some confusion. The comment about a "10-year lease turning into a 20-year prison sentence" is an analogy. It's a way of expressing the feeling of being trapped or confined in a situation that has become difficult or unbearable. In this context, the "10-year lease" represents a contract where a landlord hands over their property to the Council. The "20-year prison sentence" is a metaphorical way of describing the feeling of being stuck in this agreement for longer than expected, especially when the Council fails to uphold their end of the agreement, such as maintaining the property. This analogy is not meant to be taken literally. It's a tool used to convey the emotional experience of the situation. It underscores the importance of clear communication and understanding between both parties before entering into a lease agreement. I hope this explanation helps clarify the analogy. If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 12:32 PM

Interesting Peter, I see that "Rent Smart Wales," only interest is the fees you pay to them periodically. When you sell up, they'll be complaining that LLs are selling up, which is why we have a shortage of housing.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 09:15 AM

They can say what they want! If a property goes to auction and doesn't sell, that property has now been tarnished from a property investors perspective! Meaning, that if the same property has been on Zoopla or Rightmove for more than 60 days, has been reduced 3-4 times, gone SSTC on 2 separate occasions etc, then you are going to have challenges in selling that property again, unless you go "off market."

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 09:06 AM

Can we give the same renters that they house, the right to request a property check, boosting inspection and enforcement capability, and greater accountability against their council run landlords? The results will be very incriminating for these councils!

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 09:00 AM

The reason behind this, is that LLs are not applying for BTL mortgages!

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 08:56 AM

I sympathise with you Nick and Lee. It's crucial to remember that while tenants indeed have rights, these rights come with corresponding responsibilities. One such responsibility is ensuring proper ventilation of the property. Failing to do so can lead to issues such as dampness, mould, and condensation, which are often mistakenly attributed to the LL. The crux of the matter is that tenants need to be accountable and take responsibility for maintaining the condition of their homes. This includes understanding and addressing potential issues before they escalate. Therefore, it's advisable for tenants to undergo an assessment before moving into a home to ensure they are fully aware of their obligations, in accordance with the T&C's of their agreement. This not only helps in maintaining a healthy living environment but also fosters a harmonious landlord-tenant relationship and transparency.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 08:50 AM

Many private rental sector LLs have lost faith in the BTL sector. The government's actions towards councils are not as bad as what they have done to the PRS LLs. LLs are being hit by everyone, including the councils, who are now crying for support. The councils are one of the biggest culprits, and now they want our help. By the time the 'Renter reform bill' lands, you'll see another 20% of LLs exiting the BTL sector. It's got to the point where there's nothing to talk about. We all know how council-run boroughs have managed PRS LLs' properties on 10-year leases. Those 10-year leases were the equivalent of 20-year prison sentences for most LLs, and when we wanted to talk, it fell on deaf ears. If we managed the properties in the same manner as they did, under these proposed landlord licensing schemes, many of us would get fines on average of £30K and be sent to prison. However, this isn't applicable to the councils.

From: Franklin I 10 January 2024 08:12 AM

What I've found with a particular type of tenant, is that you can have a tenant that likes to ventilate the property and another tenant who thinks by permanently closing the windows, they are saving on energy bills, because it's their right! I had one tenant, who didn't see the importance of switching on the MVHR (Mechanical Ventilation Heat Recovery) System. The end results, was unnecessary mould and condensation. The AST agreement clearly states in the tenants must ventilate the property, and clearly stipulates the MVHR. It's important that tenants get basic training on how to live in a property, in the same way that landlords are assessed for running the services of a property via periodic regulations, legislations and licensing. We get penalised for not being compliant, the tenants penalise landlords, for being non-compliant and and adopting a nonchalant attitude!

From: Franklin I 09 January 2024 18:58 PM

The cost of evicting a tenant in the UK can cost anywhere between £1,300 and £2,200, depending on whether you opt for the County Court or the High Court. The High Court option is approximately £900 to £1,000 more than the County Court option, but can take seven days, in comparison to the County Court, which can take several weeks or months.

From: Franklin I 09 January 2024 18:30 PM

"I'm sorry to hear about your situation, Shane. It sounds like you've been dealing with a lot of stress and frustration trying to evict your tenants. Unfortunately, the process of eviction can be complicated and time-consuming, especially if the tenants refuse to leave or the council intervenes. As you mentioned, the Highland Council has advised your tenants to stay put as they have nowhere else to go, which can make it difficult for you to sell the property or find new tenants. The First-tier Tribunal for Scotland (Housing and Property Chamber) in Glasgow has also rejected your claims twice, which can be discouraging and costly. It is important to note that the property laws for sales, HMOs, and tenants in Scotland are different from the rest of the UK. For example, the Private Residential Tenancy (PRT) is the standard tenancy agreement in Scotland, which replaced the previous assured and short assured tenancies. The PRT has different rules and regulations compared to the tenancy agreements in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Similarly, the rules and regulations for HMOs in Scotland are different from those in other parts of the UK. For instance, an HMO in Scotland is defined as a home shared by three or more people who are members of three or more families, and it must meet certain standards. The regulations also provide that where a dwelling is an HMO, the non-resident owner will be liable for council tax. If you're considering reducing your portfolio or getting out of the game altogether, I won't blame you, as you're not alone. You may also want to consider joining a landlord association or a support group to connect with other landlords who have faced similar challenges and share their experiences and advice.

From: Franklin I 09 January 2024 18:18 PM

"Another problem Rob, is that the council won’t have any tenant’s to house, after the poor landlord has gone through that ordeal, and shared it on these kind of forums/platforms. No landlord will want to touch a council tenant, as they’ll be considered as high risk, with minimum return on investment (MROI). In addition to that, we will need to take into account of the MV when applying for a remortgage. Most lenders criteria will not accommodate the current rent set out by the LHA councils across the UK. My suggestion to the council, is to invest in their own homes for their own tenants and leave us landlords to work with the professional tenants!"

From: Franklin I 09 January 2024 17:55 PM

The issue of councils advising tenants to stay put after receiving a valid Section 21 notice is a contentious one. Applying for county court summons and bailiff fees isn't cheap, taking into account section 24 and our January tax returns each year! While some landlords may agree with my stance that such advice should be illegal, others may argue that it is the council’s duty to protect the interests of tenants and prevent homelessness. Hopefully, the proposed 'Renters Reform Bill,' aims to address some of these issues by abolishing Section 21 and introducing more comprehensive possession grounds for landlords. However, as many have pointed out, there are still overall concerns about the impact of these changes on landlords’ finances and the rental market in general.

From: Franklin I 09 January 2024 17:29 PM

"The substantial surge in interest rates is poised to have a profound impact not only on LLs but also on tenants, who may face higher rent increases as a result. As we approach January 2024, many landlords are anticipating elevated tax bills, given that some rents may no longer adequately cover the escalating mortgage payments. Moreover, delays in possession orders are compounding these challenges, while a notable proportion of motivated sellers entering the market are landlords who have found themselves at a tipping point. It is imperative to acknowledge the wide-ranging implications of these developments for both landlords and tenants alike."

From: Franklin I 22 December 2023 07:30 AM

I totally agree with A JR!

From: Franklin I 18 December 2023 10:41 AM

The case of Monsoon Properties Ltd and Prinsegate Chartered Surveyors highlights a concerning trend of letting agents and surveyors failing to meet their obligations. However, it is encouraging to see that in this instance, accountability was upheld, with the Property Ombudsman taking action. This serves as a reminder of the importance of consumer vigilance and the pursuit of recourse when faced with inadequate service.

From: Franklin I 18 December 2023 09:14 AM

The councils should initiate the process by purchasing properties from landlords who have been waiting for over 12 months for a possession order. This way, they would already have a property that is compliant.

From: Franklin I 15 December 2023 17:24 PM

The criticism of Newham Council's maladministration by Housing Secretary Michael Gove over damp and mould complaints, particularly in light of the Awaab Ishak case, has raised concerns among LLs, especially in the context of the proposed Renter's Reform Bill. This is a classic example of potential double standards, where an innocent LL may be unjustly held accountable and liable due to the negligence of a council, such as Newham. This discrepancy underscores the presence of inequitable treatment and a lack of consistency in regulatory enforcement, potentially leading to unwarranted repercussions for responsible LLs. Gove's promise of a tough regulatory regime to ensure quality housing underscores the need for accountability. The tragic resident death further emphasises the urgency of addressing housing issues that can harm residents' health. The situation highlights the importance of a balanced approach that upholds fairness and transparency in regulatory actions while ensuring high housing standards. Newham Council should face significant penalties for this violation, just as any individual landlord would be held accountable under the law.

From: Franklin I 13 December 2023 08:25 AM

"Where are these criminal LLs? They're not here on this platform, but still, we're being attacked left, right, and centre, without discrimination. Sometimes you have to ask: who's the real criminal hiding behind the laws implemented to trip up honest and innocent landlords?"

From: Franklin I 06 December 2023 00:25 AM

Then if none of the above will work John, my suggestion is to just be a lamb to the slaughter and continue to complain in vain, whilst they continue to abuse LLs. Alternatively you could always exit the PRS system, like most sensible LLs. I'm planning my exit strategy.

From: Franklin I 17 November 2023 10:49 AM

I would like to express my deep concerns regarding Labour's proposed confiscation measures in conjunction with the Renter's Reform Bill. These measures place increased responsibilities and liabilities on landlords, even for errors made by tenants. It is crucial to recognise the need for a tenant's licensing scheme and training accreditation to ensure a fair and balanced approach. 1. LLs Burden: The proposed measures impose additional responsibilities and financial penalties on LLs, making them accountable for errors made by tenants. This places an unfair burden on landlords while neglecting the importance of tenant accountability. 2. Tenant's Licensing Scheme: Introducing a tenant's licensing scheme would provide a mechanism to hold tenants accountable for their actions. Such a scheme would ensure that tenants are aware of their responsibilities and adhere to regulations, mitigating potential issues and reducing the disproportionate burden on LLs. 3. Training Accreditation for Tenants: Providing training and accreditation programs for tenants would empower them with the knowledge and skills necessary to be responsible occupants. This would foster a greater sense of accountability and enable an independent body to identify cases where the cause of a problem lies with the tenant rather than the LL. 4. Fair and Balanced Approach: Imposing legislations, regulations, and financial penalties solely on LLs while neglecting tenant responsibility is an imbalanced approach. It is essential to recognise that both landlords and tenants play integral roles in maintaining a harmonious rental market. By implementing a tenant's licensing scheme and training accreditation, we can create a framework that promotes fairness, transparency, accountability, and effective dispute resolution. Such measures would ensure that responsibilities and liabilities are appropriately distributed between LLs and tenants, fostering a more equitable rental market. I encourage all LLs to consider the importance of tenant accountability and consider the need for a tenant's licensing scheme and training accreditation, that will offer a better protection for all LLs.

From: Franklin I 17 November 2023 09:01 AM

That one property out of 5 "AJR," will have to be sold I'm afraid. I've been in touch with my local MP, with regards to a complaint about "Usless C's." UC are so useless, I said if they don't want to pay me for the loss of 2 months rent, respond to my emails and confirm that the tenant was guilty of benefit fraud, then they should give me special exemptions to opt out from taken tenants on UC!

From: Franklin I 16 November 2023 00:45 AM

I totally agree Tricia. We're being forced to take pets, without the tenants presenting us with pet insurance or tenants insurance that will cover the costs of incidents and damages within the property.

From: Franklin I 16 November 2023 00:36 AM

I've listed some of the key points in this article, from 1 to 12; 1. The UK government has introduced the Renters (Reform) Bill to Parliament on May 17, 2023. 2. The bill aims to bring in a better deal for renters by abolishing 'no fault' evictions and reforming landlord possession grounds. 3. The bill will improve the system for both the 11 million private renters and 2.3 million landlords in England. 4. The bill will introduce more comprehensive possession grounds so landlords can still recover their property (including where they wish to sell their property or move in close family) and make it easier to repossess properties where tenants are at fault, for example in cases of anti-social behaviour and repeat rent arrears. 5. The bill will legislate for reforms set out in the PRS white paper published in June 2022. 6. The bill will make it easier to repossess properties where tenants are at fault, for example in cases of anti-social behaviour and repeat rent arrears. 7. The bill will create a new register of PRS landlords and property portal to improve data on the PRS and drive up standards across the sector. 8. The bill will establish an Ombudsman for the PRS to help tenants and landlords to resolve disputes. 9. The bill will end the system of assured shorthold tenancies. 10. The bill will ban no-fault evictions by repealing section 21 of the Housing Act 1988. 11. Councils will have the power to fine landlords up to £30,000 for breaking the law and will be able to issue rent repayment orders for up to 12 months of rent. 12. The bill will also introduce a new minimum standard for rental properties, including requirements for electrical safety checks, smoke and carbon monoxide alarms, and minimum energy efficiency standards. The problems I have with this bill are as follows; Local authorities already have a poor track record in managing properties owned by PRS landlords. I experienced this first hand when I complained about a previous tenant causing damp and mould in my property. Despite reporting the issue well in advance to the housing, environmental, and Private Sector Leasing (PSL) departments, none of them were supportive or willing to investigate, even with an official damp report. In short, they actually didn't care. Additionally, when trying to evict a council tenant, the council advises the tenants to wait for a possession order after the 2 months notice to quit has expired, which can cost over £1,000 and take more than six months to obtain access to the property. Considering recent incidents, like Awaab Ishak's tragic death involving Rochdale Boroughwide Housing, it's concerning that local councils will now be responsible for fining landlords when they themselves are often responsible for mismanaging properties provided to them under 10 year leases from PRS landlords. It's crucial to carefully evaluate this bill and address existing challenges before implementing new regulations or transferring responsibilities. We need to ensure the protection of both tenants and landlords while consistently maintaining housing standards. I will conclude this message, by stating that many LL's are on standby in regards to the final decision on the 'Renter's reform bill.' Once the final bill has been implemented, I will predict that landlord property sales will have a spike of 30% to 50% in LL's exiting the BTL market. My advise to the government, is "The council should exercise caution when dealing with PRS LL's, as the departure of a LL from the PRS market may lead their tenANts to construct temporary homes by subtracting the fourth and fifth letters ('A' and 'N') from the word 'tenANts,' resulting in 'tents'⛺." I can visualise this, more than the bill itself!

From: Franklin I 15 November 2023 14:02 PM

Reinstating Mortgage interest relief, will have the following benefits for landlord's and the PRS as a whole; 1. Financial Relief: Reinstating mortgage interest relief provides financial relief for landlords, saving them thousands of pounds annually. 2. Increased Rental Property Supply: The relief encourages landlords to stay in the market, increasing the supply of rental properties by attracting new investors. 3. Property Market Stimulus: Reintroducing the relief boosts the property market, leading to construction activity, job creation, and growth in related industries. 4. Positive Market Outlook: Aligning with market predictions, reinstating the relief creates a favourable environment for landlords and potential buyers, encouraging investment and market stability. 5. Addressing Housing Imbalances: The relief helps address imbalances by encouraging landlords to offer affordable rental options, increasing housing choices and potentially stabilising or reducing rental prices.

From: Franklin I 15 November 2023 07:51 AM

I would like to address the above article discussing Help2Rent's plea for private landlords to offer properties for their tenants. However, I must express my deep frustration regarding the challenges faced by private landlords. Here are some key points: 1. Financial Burdens: Private landlords are facing a crisis with high interest rates up to 10%, new regulations, and legislations that suffocate the PRS. 2. Delays in Possession Orders: Landlords experience prolonged delays of 6 to 12 months in obtaining possession orders through the courts, hindering their ability to regain control of their properties. 3. Inadequate Renter's Reforms Bill: Proposed reforms fail to acknowledge the dire situation faced by landlords, lacking measures that genuinely benefit the private rental sector (PRS). 4. Controversial EPC Rating Proposal: The proposal to enforce an EPC rating of "C" by 2025, with hefty fines for non-compliance, adds to the burden on landlords without providing adequate support or resources. 5. Issues with Universal Credit (UC): The UC system lacks effectiveness and fails to address the concerns of landlords, leaving them in a precarious position. UC is discriminatory to LL's. The plight of private landlords in the housing crisis demands immediate attention, we're the ones who need more help than anyone! I find this article to be insensitive and offensive to all LL's.

From: Franklin I 14 November 2023 08:05 AM

Interesting, the council wants to blame the "Housing Emergency," on the PRS - LL's. Please implement the Renter's reform bill, and see how quickly your Housing Emergency, turns into a Housing Crisis!

From: Franklin I 08 November 2023 01:39 AM

I think this article was taken from an "Electricians News Article," pointless putting it on here.

From: Franklin I 02 November 2023 09:06 AM

The provided information pertains to a newly launched guidance document called "Best Practice Guide 10: Electrical safety standards in the private rented sector." This guide aims to ensure clarity and consistency in reporting electrical safety checks for private rentals. It covers various aspects such as required inspection and testing, producing detailed reports, defining the extent and limitations of electrical safety checks, and providing information for landlords, tenants, and electricians on what to expect during the check. The guide is part of a series of best practice guides produced by charity Electrical Safety First and industry bodies. **Breakdown:** 1. Introduction: The document is titled "Best Practice Guide 10: Electrical safety standards in the private rented sector." 2. Purpose: The guide aims to provide clarity and consistency in reporting electrical safety checks. 3. Inspection and Testing: It covers the requirements for inspection and testing procedures. 4. Detailed Reports: The guide provides instructions on how to produce comprehensive and detailed reports. 5. Scope and Limitations: It offers guidance on defining the extent and limitations of electrical safety checks. 6. Target Audience: The guide is designed to cater to the needs of landlords, tenants, and electricians. 7. Expectations: It outlines what landlords, tenants, and electricians should expect during the electrical safety check. 8. Preparation: The guide provides information on how to prepare for an electrical safety check. 9. Series of Guides: It is part of a series of best practice guides created by the charity Electrical Safety First and industry bodies. 10. Overall Objective: The guide aims to ensure thorough electrical safety checks in private rentals and facilitate the reporting of any identified defects.

From: Franklin I 02 November 2023 07:20 AM

-The standard AST agreement prohibits subletting in the PRS to safeguard all parties involved. - Various stakeholders, including freeholders, managing agents, and mortgage lenders, often restrict short-term lets in high-rise apartment blocks to ensure compliance, preserve the property's residential character, and protect residents. - Concerns associated with subletting include landlords licensing requirements, potential exploitation, tenant conflicts, impact of owner occupiers, insurance and a lack of stability for sub-tenants. - Many managing agents require tenants to obtain consent to lease, involving the submission of a form and payment of an annual fee to maintain accurate records and effective property management. - The Grenfell disaster highlights the need for stringent safety measures, making it crucial to exercise caution regarding subletting practices to uphold fire safety protocols, evacuation procedures, and building security. - Encouraging subletting without considering landord licensing, safety regulations, and building security is not advisable, in addition to providing "Right to Rent documents. - Adhering to existing regulations and evaluating proposed changes to subletting practices in light of safety concerns is essential for the integrity of the housing market and residents' well-being. In short, I agree that this is a very stupid, reckless and irresponsible suggestion.

From: Franklin I 30 October 2023 07:44 AM

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 22:08 PM

Tenant's fee ban of 2019, won't permit that.

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 22:07 PM

Hi Pat Gan, In my last sentence, I wrote the following; It's better to do something than nothing at all! We all have a choice, you can either sink or swim.

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 17:43 PM

Landbay Mortgages' lack of mortgage support is concerning. They automatically switch customers from a 5-year fixed-rate mortgage at 3.49% to a variable rate of 10% without options for product switching. This leaves LL's without viable alternatives in today's difficult market.

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 17:39 PM

Urgent Concerns for Landlords: Taking Action to Safeguard our Future These are undoubtedly troubling times for all of us. If we choose to remain passive, we risk becoming vulnerable and facing significant challenges that could severely impact our livelihoods. It feels as though we are sitting ducks or lambs to the slaughter, unless we take action to navigate through these turbulent waters. The solicitor has brought to our attention a disconcerting reality: the average yearly rent in the UK is estimated to be around £18,000 to £22,000 per annum. However, with the Reform Bill looming over us, the consequences for landlords could be severe, including fines of up to £30,000. It is crucial that we recognise the potential implications and act accordingly. The introduction of Section 24 and the government's prevention of current LLs from booking possession order dates have further compounded our concerns. Additionally, the impending implementation of new EPC ratings in 2025, with a specific focus on achieving a C rating, along with new regulations and legislations, and the interest rates reaching 10%, all contribute to a sense of impending disaster. It is akin to boarding the Titanic, knowing full well its tragic fate, yet still deciding to embark on the journey. Similar to the events that unfolded in June 2023, when five individuals tragically lost their lives during the Titanic submersible expedition, we cannot ignore the signs that point to a potential disaster. It is crucial that we take this analogy to heart and acknowledge the urgency of the situation. In light of these challenges, I urge you to approach this predicament as if it were a game of Monopoly, where we must strategically make use of all available resources, including our "get out of jail free" card. We must come together and proactively explore every possible avenue to safeguard our investments and ensure our long-term sustainability. This is why I was calling for a "Tenant's licensing scheme." Let us engage in open dialogue, share information, and collaborate with relevant stakeholders. By staying informed and taking decisive action, we can navigate through these treacherous waters and protect our interests. Just as the survivors of the Titanic tragedy emerged stronger and more resilient, we too can overcome these challenges if we stand united. I implore you to join me in rising to this occasion. Together, we can weather this storm and emerge as stronger, more secure landlords, ready to face whatever lies ahead. Go to change.org and sign the petition entitled "Petition for Equitable Rights for Tenants and Landlords." It's better to do something than nothing at all.

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 07:52 AM

Hi Nick, I completely understand your frustration with estate agents. In my 26 years as a landlord, I have consistently found them to be ineffective in handling crucial aspects of property management. When it comes to full management, estate agents prove to be useless. They excel at finding tenants and getting them through the doors, but once that initial step is done, they often become surplus to requirements. Particularly in cases of non-payment of rent or antisocial behavior, estate agents offer little assistance. Instead of actively addressing these issues, their typical response is to advise landlords to summon tenants to court, leaving the landlords to handle the process themselves. In my experience, estate agents are far from reliable in these scenarios, and I have found it necessary to take matters into my own hands. Their lack of effectiveness in crucial situations has led me to adopt a more hands-on approach to property management.

From: Franklin I 26 October 2023 07:15 AM

I agree that agent renewal fees are a rip-off and should be banned. The Tenant Fees Act 2019 has already banned them for tenants, these fees were implemented by the estate agents, but landlords had to pay back to the tenants 1 weeks rent. This "BS," fee is unfair and unjustified, as the agent's work was done when they found the tenant and signed the contract. If the tenant stays or leaves, it's because of the landlord's work, not the agent's. I don't pay renewal fees to any agents, and I advise other landlords to do the same. We should not be fleeced by agents who provide no value for money.

From: Franklin I 25 October 2023 10:26 AM

"Hello Neighbour,” only charges a small fee of less than £150/annum for doing the AST-Agreement, similar to “Purple Bricks.” Annoyed Landlord.

From: Franklin I 25 October 2023 10:04 AM

Some PRS - LLs are currently facing challenges related to low energy performance certificates (EPC) ratings, specifically ratings of E and D. Failure to comply with the regulations by 2025 could result in a significant increase in fines, from £5,000 to £30,000. The costs associated with improving the energy efficiency of properties, moving them from E to D and D to C, range from £4,000 to £14,000 per band. Despite the pressing need for compliance, LLs are also grappling with other issues such as high interest rates and delays in obtaining possession orders for Section 21 and Section 8, while the unpopular Renter's Reform Bill looms, awaiting implementation. It appears that the government may have to consider exploring alternative solutions, such as repurposing abandoned airports or airfields, to establish emergency refugee camps for the homeless population, as the changes in the PRS are perceived to have had a detrimental impact. It is a challenging time, and the future of the PRS remains uncertain. RIP 🙏⚰

From: Franklin I 20 October 2023 17:18 PM

I've done it with Lewisham council. You receive £4,500 up front, plus market rent and the option of a working tenant on UC, or a full time tenant on UC. I opted for the working tenant on UC. She came in January 2020 and I evicted her in June 29th, 2023. Currently, the LHA rent is now £400 below the market value in Lewisham Borough. My advise to anyone and everyone is to stay clear. Evicting them will be challenging, when you have an issue pertaining to the tenant, such as mould and you want to prove to the council, that the mould in the property is caused by the tenants lack of ventilation, the council won't be interested! If you have a problem with the rent payment, all it takes is for the tenant to tell UC, that they don't live at your address no more, and then UC will ignore your pleas, under data protection, even if you have proof that the tenant still resides at the address. It's a sweet and sour scenario at first. Let the council build temporary container homes for their own tenants, and stay well clear!!

From: Franklin I 16 October 2023 07:53 AM

Another unnecessary expense we don't need! Landlords are exiting the BTL industry for several reasons, including the potential impact of the Renter's Reform Bill, the requirement for properties to have a minimum EPC rating, increased legislation and compliance burdens, delays in obtaining possession orders, reduced mortgage interest relief, higher stamp duty charges, lower rental yields due to rising property prices, changes in tenant demand and affordability, the time and effort required to manage properties, and the exploration of alternative investment opportunities.

From: Franklin I 11 October 2023 10:04 AM

What are they expecting, a 50% reduction in rent after landlords have been waiting for possession orders since November 2022? This may be overly optimistic. Rent prices, evictions and other related matters are influenced by various factors, and reforms alone may not lead to such a drastic decrease. Moreover, if LL's are not part of the equation, the reform bill may become ineffective. LL's with commonsense might choose to sell their properties instead of dealing with burdensome regulations/legislation. Striking a balance between tenant protection and LL interests is crucial for the success of any reforms.

From: Franklin I 19 September 2023 21:08 PM

It is only when they see a decline in BTL mortgage sales that they'll be saying that the Renter's reform bill was extremely bad for our BTL business module. We used to extort a lot of money through the BTL's via our exceptionally high product fees, and since the introduction of the Renter's reform bill, we've seen profits slashed to zero, as the PRS LL's have all jumped ship!

From: Franklin I 19 September 2023 19:01 PM

GenRen should enter the PRS market.

From: Franklin I 10 September 2023 22:15 PM

This article appears to contradict itself. In the Gaurdian article by Tom Wall & Shanti Das, dated Sat 19 Nov 2022 08.11 EST, the headline read: "UK tenants face blame for causing toxic mould and deadly hazards under new rules." w-w-w Dot the guardian dot com/society/2022/nov/19/uk-tenants-face-blame-for-causing-toxic-mould-and-deadly-hazards-under-new-rules I've witnessed many tenant's incriminate the LL's simply by failing to ventilate the property. This new law, with the 'Renter's Reform bill.' is just another nail in the coffin, especially when the tenant is irresponsible and negligent. This is why I'm calling for a "Tenant's Licensing," so it can highlight who is actually accountable for what, over a period of time, when the LL has clearly shown steps taken to prevent mould, damp and condensation!

From: Franklin I 08 September 2023 18:24 PM

It seems that when they extracted all the data from the Landlords Licensing applications, that was sold on, via the council's, they said look at all these EPC results. The LL's have an average rating of D/E. We can make some money here, just as the government will do so in 2025, when LL's will get fines of up to £30K if their EPC rating isn't a C rating or above! When the PRS is gone, it'll be gone for ever.

From: Franklin I 08 September 2023 09:27 AM

Seems like they want to set these rent controls to be in line with the LHA's in all borough's, to make Universal Credit more widely available for all tenant's. The BTL mortgage lenders will be telling LL's, that we can't give you a mortgage, as your rental income is too low. LL's are already quitting BTL.

From: Franklin I 07 September 2023 09:44 AM

From: Franklin I 05 September 2023 12:47 PM

It's okay Nick, if they don't listen, we can just play this outi like a game of chess. Their will be no stale mates involved, check mates all the way in favour of LL's.

From: Franklin I 04 September 2023 13:19 PM

I totally agree with you Ellie, the heading "Renters Reform Bill: Landlords urged to prepare for changes as MPs return." The headlines could easily read in the future; Renters Reform Bill: MP's urged to prepare for mass exodus of LL's in PRS."

From: Franklin I 04 September 2023 11:17 AM

I wrote to my local MP, Janet Darby, in regards to my concerns pertaining to the effects/impact the 'Renter's Reform bill,' will have on LL's. I was provided with a "Response," letter attached to the email, along with a link at dot gov UK. "Guide to the Renters (Reform) Bill," was the link also provided in the attached letter from RACHEL MACLEAN MP Minister of State for Housing and Planning. The following letter read as follows: Dear Janet, 31st August 2023. Thank you for your email to the Rt Hon Michael Gove MP on behalf of your constituent, Mr Franklin I, regarding the Renters (Reform) Bill and tenant licencing. I am replying as the Minister responsible for this policy area. I am very sorry to hear of the challenges Mr Franklin I, has faced with his tenant. I would like to assure him that we recognise the vital role that good landlords play in providing homes for millions of people across the country. We know that the overwhelming majority of landlords provide a good service, and that they both care for their properties and care about the tenants who occupy them. As you are aware, on 17 May, the Renters (Reform) Bill was introduced to Parliament. The Bill delivers the government’s manifesto commitment to abolish section 21 “no fault” evictions. It will help ensure tenants, including many families with children, can rent decent, secure homes from which they can put down roots in their communities, take up jobs, and build stable lives. It will also bolster the ability of good landlords to evict problematic tenants, and, in many cases, it will be quicker for a landlord to evict a tenant than it is now. A guide to the Bill can be found here: "dot gov dot uk/guidance/guide-to-the-renters-reform-bill." Mr Franklin I, raised a proposal to introduce tenant licensing. While the government does not currently plan to introduce tenant licensing, we are committed to making sure all parties are aware of their rights and responsibilities. The government is currently conducting a review of the available guidance to tenants and landlords to ensure that each group is aware of their rights and can also fulfil their responsibilities. We are planning a communications campaign to raise awareness of the Renters (Reform) Bill and the changes that will come out of that, the campaign will direct people to guidance which is relevant to them. We regularly meet with charities such as Shelter, Citizen’s Advice and other tenant organisations as well as landlord and agent bodies such as NRLA and ARLA. We have good relationships with key stakeholders and actively seek out their views. We are planning some user research on our guidance to ensure it works for landlords and tenants. The government will also require all tenants and landlords to have a written statement setting out details such as the tenancy start date, rent level, landlord address and basic rights and responsibilities of both parties. A written statement will provide tenants and landlords with a clear summary of their rights and responsibilities, while retaining their right to agree and adapt terms to meet their needs. We will allow time for a smooth transition to the new system, supporting tenants, landlords and agents to adjust, while making sure that tenants can benefit from the new system as soon as reasonably possible. Again, while the government wants to see more people buying their own homes, I fully recognise that private rented properties are a crucial part of a properly functioning property system, and I thank Mr Franklin I, for taking the time to write in and lay out his concerns. Thank you again for your email. Yours sincerely, RACHEL MACLEAN MP Minister of State for Housing and Planning. Please feel free to share your comments.....

From: Franklin I 04 September 2023 10:36 AM

Don't worry about the LL's who've waited for a PO since November 2022, and received no rent, only for GenRen to be rewarded with the 'Tenant’s reform bill,' and now propose another piece of crap that will accelerate the extinction of PRS - LL's for good. I'm guessing that the news of increased interest rate on BTL mortgages hasn't been brought to their attention. In addition to other LL's expecting their PO hearing dates next month, being cancelled at short notice, because the government instructed the courts to do so. LL's still have to pay tax, inherit bad credit and get no support whatsoever. Keep coming up with these pathetic plans, as the more LL's that disappear, will only result in tenant's becoming homeless. GenRen will become surplus to all requirements!

From: Franklin I 26 August 2023 03:20 AM

I quote a paragraph from the above article. The Government has described the Bill as ‘bringing in a better deal for renters.’ For better for worse, this bill will be the curse. When the table becomes empty, where do you plan to put those deals?

From: Franklin I 19 August 2023 11:59 AM

Wow, that's a lot Michael. I've had a property there since 2001. I'm surprised by those statistics. In order to get a BTL mortgage, they require SA302's, Tax year over views, confirmation of tax paid etc etc.

From: Franklin I 19 August 2023 11:55 AM

The new LL's will inevitably have to come from the local authorities, the existing ones will either leave, or just avoid any tenant on UC like the plague. Renter's are preparing for the reform bill, LL's are preparing for the exodus.

From: Franklin I 19 August 2023 11:51 AM

I totally agree. All this Proptech and it takes longer than it did two decades ago.

From: Franklin I 10 August 2023 10:31 AM

Seems like it all depends on your local borough and how long it takes them to come back with the searches. Many years ago, you used to be able to request for a "personal search," in order to fast track the conveyancing process. Rather than wait 10 to 12 weeks, you'll pay a small fee of £30, and you'll get the search results in 3 to 4 days. Apparently, this service is no longer available. I thought that the whole point of making the conveyancing transaction become fully electronic/online, was to address these delays and speed up the process.

From: Franklin I 10 August 2023 10:24 AM

I hear you Jo Westlake, tenants need to also be educated about the basic fundamentals on living in a rented property.

From: Franklin I 09 August 2023 10:58 AM

When you look on your EPC, and you see the current rating, verses the potential rating, improvements to make your home more energy efficient, could cost from £4K to £14K, for internal or external wall insulation. Then you have the double glazing, the replacement boiler etc. A lot of spending, no tax holidays, I'll welcome some form of incentive.

From: Franklin I 09 August 2023 08:56 AM

The bill should be called the Landlord's and Tenant's reform bill, but as this is a direct attack on all LL's, the government appears to be showing support towards the tenant, which is currently doing more damage than good for the tenants! The first sign of damage, is the huge increase in rent, within the PRS and the LHA lagging way behind on their comparisons. In short, this bill will have a very short life span of less than 1 year, because LL's will simply start to disappear!

From: Franklin I 08 August 2023 11:56 AM

This is the reason why I've been campaigning for "Tenant's Licensing." The "Right to rent, " documentation is data protection! In order for the LL to confirm the status of the tenant's "Right to rent," the LL will require their DOB and NI number. Under these circumstances, most LL's would and should have already been registered with the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) as data controllers, with a registration number provided to the tenants, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Letter/Notification upon each tenancy renewal. The problem we have here, is that if your tenant is in rent arrears or uncooperative, you may face difficulties in getting them to provide you with the "Right to Rent," especially if, they're adamant that you're not getting their NI number. In addition to all of that, the documentation has an expiry date and has to be presented to the tenant upon each tenancy renewal. It's for this reason, that the tenant should also be accountable for providing and taking a joint responsibility in providing these documents, not just the LL!

From: Franklin I 08 August 2023 11:41 AM

This is the reason why I've been campaigning for "Tenant's Licensing." The "Right to rent, " documentation is data protection! In order for the LL to confirm the status of the tenant's "Right to rent," the LL will require their DOB and NI number. Under these circumstances, most LL's would and should have already been registered with the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) as data controllers, with a registration number provided to the tenants, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Letter/Notification upon each tenancy renewal. The problem we have here, is that if your tenant is in rent arrears or uncooperative, you may face difficulties in getting them to provide you with the "Right to Rent," especially if, they're adamant that you're not getting their NI number. In addition to all of that, the documentation has an expiry date and has to be presented to the tenant upon each tenancy renewal. It's for this reason, that the tenant should also be accountable for providing and taking a joint responsibility in providing these documents, not just the LL!

From: Franklin I 08 August 2023 11:40 AM

What was "Generation Rent group," expecting? Hoping that LL's wouldn't pass on all of the added sh*t we've had to deal with and then announce that we're not increasing rent. Their's nothing to admit, what they should've done well in advance, was to warn their member's, that with the pressure being imposed on UK 🇬🇧 LL's, the inevitable is going to happen. If you've got a garden, ask your LL's if you can pitch a tent outside and sublet your room.

From: Franklin I 03 August 2023 18:32 PM

They want to increase the interest rates, add Landlord Licensing and then introduce rent cap controls, after removing our wear and tear allowance, our tax relief and the whole 9! These politicians are incredibly stupid.

From: Franklin I 03 August 2023 10:02 AM

I've not received any complaints. The heading should read "Landlord's claim “thousands of complaints” about councils and homes that they've managed." Just go to Trust Pilot or any reputable reviews site, type in your council name/housing department.

From: Franklin I 28 July 2023 09:06 AM

Have the council's forgotten how useless they are at managing LL's home?

From: Franklin I 28 July 2023 08:57 AM

It's as if the government sat down a couple of decades ago, and said let's plug a hole in this housing crisis and shift the responsibilities from the local governments to ordinary LL's. Bingo! Let's create a BTL industry, use everyday LL's as pawns within our chess pieces, and once it finally matures and generates a billion pound industry annually and reaches that threshold, lets tax these LL's to death! Let's create unnecessary regulations, legislations and raid their budgets to fund our budgets, use them as scapegoats and create a 'Renter's reform bill,' that will further incriminate LL's as the problem and not the solution within the housing crisis.

From: Franklin I 27 July 2023 21:59 PM

You said it Robert on behalf of all LL's on this forum and 90% of LL's in the UK. We must note, that not all tenant's are scum. Let's just say we have professional, we have scum and then we have UC! You're right also Nick, and we are actually the workhouses for the ungrateful tenant's who don't conform to the laws, but get new reforms from the laws!

From: Franklin I 27 July 2023 11:28 AM

They'll be complaining for nothing, when the statistics confirm that 30% of LL's have left the industry each year since the introduction of the 'Renter's reform bill. '

From: Franklin I 27 July 2023 09:02 AM

This is a very rare case by the council, which highlights how much they're struggling to meet demand. So how will the so called 'Renter's form bill,' benefit the same rogue tenant who is causing problems for the same LL in Willesden? The council tends to have a double standard approach when dealing with the PRS LL's. Firstly, they're very desperate to find homes for tenants, but when that tenant becomes a problem for the LL, they don't want to know. This is where the problems begin, as the LL is all on their own, with no support network. To add insult to injury, the tenant isn't paying rent, the LL is in arrears, so that LL has to serve a S21. It's generally at this point when the 2 months notice has been served, that the council advises the same tenant to 'sit tight,' until the bailiffs arrive. It's this cost that becomes the nail in the coffin for most LL's, as this is an additional £1,250+ in county court/bailiff fees, currently with a waiting time from 1 to 6 months plus, in addition to your rent arrears. Whilst Brent council have provided a resolution for the LL, this is just temporary, as most LL will still want the tenant removed.

From: Franklin I 27 July 2023 08:50 AM

Why don't they just cut to the chase. Their's no exploring to do, the figures have already been calculated in their budgets. The average LL's licensing costs £400 with discounts. I recently paid £300 in Newham, with a discount which would've cost £750. Let's take the figure of £300 per LL and times that by another 300 LL's within the borough, and you have a total figure of £90,000. Assuming that you have 1,500 LL's with that borough, including both private and limited companies, then you're looking at £450,000. Now that's something worth exploring, with better yields and a great ROI, from the council's perspective and certainly not ours!

From: Franklin I 26 July 2023 08:27 AM

What they should be doing is giving LL's grants to improve epc ratings. Like William said, this is too late, as damaged has already been done.

From: Franklin I 23 July 2023 06:01 AM

Void periods are also a hidden cost. Whilst this comes under maintenance, the true evaluation of any damage can only be assessed when the tenant has vacated. Not all checking out inventories pick up the hidden repair costs, tenant's fail to report. Then you have the Section 8 evictions, non payment of rents, the section 21 evictions, which includes separate court fees, separate bailiff fees etc. Stamp duty hikes for LL's and Tenant’s fee ban costs etc. When a LL has to wait more than 6 months for a possession order, gets no support from the government and then the same tenant's get rewarded with the "Renter's reform bill. "

From: Franklin I 22 July 2023 12:58 PM

Rents and demands are dipping, because no LL with common sense will use Foxton's.

From: Franklin I 22 July 2023 09:48 AM

The Landlords Licensing scheme, is just an excuse to extort money from LL's. In 2012, shortly after the 2012 Olympics, Newham council were the first council in the UK to propose and do a consultation for Landlord's Licensing. I filed the forms, like most LL's and we all voted against it. Six months later, it became law. During the 2012 Olympics, most LL's around Stratford E15, were letting their apartments out for £6,500 for the two week period of the games. A lot of money was going out, but the council was just a spectator. They had to find a spectacular way of cashing in on the LL's Olympic success. This is where the Landlord's Licensing was born. Newham council has just issued out its third Licensing, which was 2012, 2017 and now 2023, as 2022 was delayed for reviews. If you're a member of a LL's association, a discount is applicable and the form can take 40 to 60 minutes to fill out. Nothing is excluded, all document uploads included!

From: Franklin I 19 July 2023 23:15 PM

I totally agree with you Vibha and I fully appreciate the way you addressed the responsibilities of the "Right to Rent," being a shared responsibility, rather than the landlords as I mentioned the same thing in my campaign. The Right to rent involves data protection, whereby the tenant's date of birth and NI number is required. In addition to that, the "Right to Rent," certificate has an expiry date and has to be renewed periodically. You have to also produce this document before commencement of an agreement and upon each renewal. Failure to do this, can result in a fine of £1K and £3K for repeat offender's. This is the reason why I went on to "Change dot org," to campaign for "Tenant's licensing." It should be mandatory and statutory for all Tenant's in England and Wales to produce an Insurance certificate before commencement of a tenancy agreement and upon each renewal. The pet insurance will be separate and I would like to see a Tenant's Licensing brought into effect, that will produce a basic fundamental understanding and requirements with an accredited certificate that will be presented to the LL's along with their insurance certificate and Right to Rent documentation. They should also implement a credit score that will show the tenant has intentionally defaulted on rent arrears, so that when they look for good LL's in future, we can ignore them due to not meeting a set criteria. Please search for Tenant's Licensing in "Change dot org."

From: Franklin I 12 July 2023 21:02 PM

Just imagine, a LL who has served a S8 notification after two months rent arrears, then submits a PO after two weeks. The PO is still pending after 3 months due to court backlogs, with no confirmed date and the tenant is still residing at the property, with no rent payments. Now we're talking 5 months of arrears for the LL. (Accelerated PO's are not permitted for S8 only for S21) This is the true picture of what LL's are facing, whilst all these analysts are acknowledging the statistics, at the same time, they're failing to identify the actual cause of the problems in the first place and what immediate measures can be taken to address, prevent and protect those LL's who have become victims of neglect, when your only main focus/concern is on a reform bill that only focuses on the RENTER's who are indirectly causing these figures to spiral with NON PAYMENT OF RENT to their LL's!

From: Franklin I 12 July 2023 18:20 PM

May I quote one of the following, from the seventh paragraph. "The company hosted an informal roundtable discussion with Andrew Lewer MP, member of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, and senior representatives from lettings agencies Belvoir, Dexters and Foxtons." I will stop at Foxtons, and just say that any discussions with this estate agent about the reform bill, will have no benefit whatsoever for LL's. No mention of any LL's association at this roundtable meeting. I've heard talks of a MP suggesting that they want to enforce the 'right to buy' policy for tenant's to purchase the rented property from their PRS, LL's. At the end of the day, no matter what you bring to this roundtable, the LL will have the last say through actions that speak louder than words. My advise, would be to ensure that the roundtable is made from solid concrete, with legs made from reinforced steel, bolted down to the steel beams on the floors, as one more implementation, regulations, legislations, interest rate hike and continued disregard of LL's rights, will see the end of BTL forever! 'Renter's reform bill,' RIP 🙏

From: Franklin I 12 July 2023 08:43 AM

I don't think conversions are the government's problems or solutions. They need to look more into the big 5 house builders in the UK. An example, is when the government releases land for the main house builders, the builder's are required by law, to reserve 25% in each council, for affordable housing. The builder's ignore this request most of the times, and when planning permission has been granted for 7 storeys, it's not uncommon for the house builders to just forge ahead and build 10 storeys. The people that actually lose out, are the ones seeking affordable housing. This converts potential FTB, back to the PRS, and the LL's become the scapegoats once again for something we didn't create.

From: Franklin I 11 July 2023 12:16 PM

LL's are actually exiting the market and they will continue to do so, with all the new laws, regs and legislation the government is implemented. Simple commonsense, is not common in the House of commons where LL's are concerned. Rents have sky rocketed, and they've not figured out the reason why yet! As a LL, my business model, like most LL's is to deal direct with the tenant. I'm not interested in dealing with 3rd parties to collect my rent each month. When there's an issue of non-payment of rent for 2 to 3 months, I don't want to hear the 3rd party telling me that they can't provide me with any further info due to data protection and their's nothing they can do with my rent arrears. Hence the reason why most LL's don't want anything to do with tenant's on benefits, UC etc etc. It's a huge liability and extremely high risk, with no support network for LL's. Lewisham council offer £4,500 to LL's for taking tenant's on UC for 2 yrs minimum contract, which means life! It'll be better for the council to give the LL's £3,500 instead of £4,500 and then £1,000 for the tenant's to go on a basic tenant's fundamental accredited course on understanding the requirements of a tenant and the contracts they sign.

From: Franklin I 11 July 2023 11:52 AM

They want our help now, but when we need their help, with the same tenant's they provide us with, they have no sympathy for LL's.

From: Franklin I 11 July 2023 08:14 AM

The LHA, doesn't even cover the rent payments for most tenant's on UC in their local borough. Makes me wonder how the government will force LL's to accept tenant's on UC, making it illegal to discriminate against a system that discriminates against LL's.

From: Franklin I 11 July 2023 08:11 AM

100%. Dealing with UC, is like taking a tenant with a guarantor. Very high risk!

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 14:44 PM

100%. One stays on, and finds a replacement, the other leaves. I've had them scenarios a few times, works perfectly.

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 14:42 PM

I totally agree with you Peter, and if property prices were to rise in between that time by 15 to 25%, that would be the the LL's "get out of jail free card!" When the PRS stats show a sudden and steep decline, the government will be campaigning for more LL's to re-enter the BTL market, forgetting that they were the ones who caused the death of the PRS LL's! Video killed the radio star, by the Buggles. The government's BTL scheme killed the FTB. Now Gove 'n' Mental institutions implementing their bills, have killed off the BTL market for good!

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 14:40 PM

With all the regs and legislations, we're already a charity when it comes to majority, not all, but most tenants on UC.

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 14:24 PM

Mrs C Byrne's many thanks! Emily Simmons, I think they're the ones who will be needing all the luck when LL's start to disappear! Jahan Khan, Nick Van Hoogstraaten, Andrew Townshend, Simon Logan I honestly don't believe that Jason Flicker is a LL, because if he was, he wouldn't be talking so much NONSENSENE, I do believe that he is a tenant though! Simon Logan we'd all love that, but the government will officially make it law, and I think it will only backfire! It takes a lot to be a LL, and being a stupid LL isn't an option for most (ROGUE LL's EXCLUDED).

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 09:01 AM

9 out of 10 times they won't meet the requirements. The LHA rent payment for a 2 bedroom flat in the borough of Lewisham is £1,400 pcm at its peak for tenant's on UC. Professional working tenant's are paying £300 pcm more. I'd love to see how they will summons a LL for discrimination in this scenario. I hear you William, and the same also applies to Homeserve's "LL's plumbing policy."

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 08:38 AM

I would appreciate, if the 'Renter's reform bill,' was rebranded as the 'Landlord's and Tenant's reform bill.' That would be more appropriate. This bill is just another exclusion for LL's. UC doesn't have a dedicated number, email address or support network for LL's, but it has all of that plus more for the tenants. The same also applies to all local councils within the UK, pertaining to damp. If you want to complain about a tenant who is causing mould, damp and condensation, you have no one to contact, but if it's the tenant complaining, then the email address will be disrepair@yourlocalcouncil.gov.uk, dedicated email address/phone numbers for tenant's only! For example, a tenant on UC, has a work coach. I had a tenant that was 2 months in rent arrears, and the tenant blocked my application that was initially successful and approved for 'ADRP,' aka Apply for Direct Rent Payment for LL's. When S21 notice was served on May 23rd, 2023, the rent due on May the 28th wasn't paid. The tenant told UC that I'm lying, and no rent is owed, because tenant has vacated. This message, is relayed across the message board in UC and flagged up to protect the tenant for all staff members to see. (No cross reference with LL to verify, and I was locked out due to data protection, because the address I gave of tenant didn't match their records). Meanwhile, the tenant was still residing at my property address that didn't match UC's records until June 29th, rent free, leaving the property in a poor state, with large items to dispose of. The case manager that was meant to call me didn't call to date. The email address I was provided with by UC, didn't respond to any of my emails that clearly showed the tenant was still residing at the property with video evidence of the school runs to and throw, bin collections, take away deliveries and parcel deliveries etc. I had to do my own research and contact someone high in a senior position at DWP, by the name of Mr. Kam Patel, who is responsible for the Essex and South East London region. When I sent an email on June 23rd with all the evidence , he was out of office until June 26th. On June 26th, I received my first ever form of communication from DWP/UC. Mr. Kam Patel marked my case as urgent and forwarded my case to UC, advising that someone from UC will contact me. By June 28th, 2023 the tenant was packing and on June 29th, 2023 the tenant officially vacated and left keys before the S21 notice expiry date of 28th July 2023. UC have not contacted me to date, to discuss loss of rent, and they never will, but they want LL's to abide by their rules without giving us any assurances whatsoever . I'd like to apply for special exemptions from UC tenant's under these circumstances. The 'Renter's reform bill,' should include compulsory tenant's insurance as standard, along with pet's insurance. Tenant's should undergo a 'fit and proper persons test like landlords, and they should have their own Tenant's Licensing, just as we do!

From: Franklin I 06 July 2023 05:26 AM

A lot of emphasis on rent control, but none on regulation, legislation, tax and protection for landlord's.

From: Franklin I 22 June 2023 10:17 AM

Whilst you say dream on about "Tenants Licensing," I said the same thing to Newham council, when they conducted a consultation for the proposal of a Landlords Licensing in 2013. I'm sure that at least 80% of Landlords were against it, but the following year in 2014, it became law. When all the LL's start to jump ship, and there's no one to fill the void, they may want to do a survey for LL's on what could have be done to prevent the exodus of LL's, and what changes could be made to make it fairer on all sides.

From: Franklin I 20 June 2023 14:19 PM

If the average property were to increase by 25% in the UK, I'm sure that most LL's would take the opportunity to sell up! In the event that this were to happen, I'm sure that the government would try to increase the CGT from 28% to 38% to deter LL's from selling, just to squeeze more out of us, before we exile. The whole system is discriminatory to LL's. 1) The Tenant’s Fee Act 2019, was indirectly caused by estate agents, but it was the LL's who had to compensate the tenant's. 2) The wording for the replacement of S21, known as the 'Renter's reform bill' is more like a bill of victory in support of Tenant's rights, without taking into account LL's right. For example, naming it the 'Landlord's and Tenant’s reform bill' would've been more appropriate, but it appears that this bill is an attack on LL's in support of tenants. As Landlord's, we have to provide the following before a tenancy commences/renews; 1. How To Rent Guide 2. Energy Performance Certificate 3. Landlord's Gas Safety Inspection Report 4. Deposit Protection Certificate & Prescribed Info 5. Landlord's Licensing (If applicable) 6. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Letter/Notice 7. Tenancy Agreement/Addendum to Add Clauses 8. EICR Report As for the tenants, they just turn up! I'm calling for some sort of "Tenant’s Licensing," to be made mandatory and statutory. Within this Licensing for Tenant’s, a Renter's insurance will be compulsory and all Tenant’s would have to provide their LL's with a certificate of insurance before tenancy commences/renews. Secondly, tenants would have to undergo a course, that indicates they fully understand the terms and conditions of their tenancy agreement, they fully understand the procedures/consequences in non-payment of rent, reporting repairs, damp, mould and condensation etc. In addition to this, the tenant's would also take shared responsibility in providing LL's with the renewals of their "Right to rent checks," for the duration of their tenancy! A lot of work needs to be done, as it will be against the law for LL's to discriminate against tenant's on UC, but the system implemented by UC, clearly discriminates against LL's. In fact, if a LL decides that they don't want to take on tenant's with UC, it's more likely, that they just don't want the unnecessary hassle of dealing with UC, regarding non-payment disputes whilst tenant's are still residing in property, only to be told that this is a civil matter, when you've got conclusive evidence of BENEFIT FRAUD!

From: Franklin I 20 June 2023 10:12 AM

Before Council’s want to understand the LL's problems, they need to learn how to address their own problems, first and foremost. As landlord's, we have to provide the following before letting; 1. How To Rent Guide (Updated version) 2. Energy Performance Certificate (Rated C by 2025/2028 if tenant is existing) 3. Landlord's Gas Safety Inspection Report (If applicable) 4. Deposit Protection Certificate & Prescribed Info 5. Landlord's Licensing (If applicable) 6. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Letter/Notice 7. Tenancy Agreement/Addendum to Add Clauses 8. EICR Report 9. Right to rent Failure to implement any of the above, can result in heavy fines. If a tenant decides to create a problem within the property, concerning damp, mould or condensation, it's not hard for a tenant to incriminate the LL even though the LL has proof of evidence to show works carried out. If a tenant decides to not use a dehumidifier provided or ventilate the property as recommended in the guidelines by the LL, it's the LL's who will be liable snd not the Council. In my case, I was advising the council to please come an inspect the property, as new windows have been installed, the damp, mould and condensation specialist have completed their work. I wanted them to log and identify the problem that all the tradespeople could see, was that of the tenant and not the LL. The council were simply not interested. The child in the property is asthmatic and the mother is uncooperative. No damp was ever identified on the previous tenants, going back 10 years. The council worker just cut me off and said I've got to go. The point I'm making here, is that we have to be assessed and it should be mandatory and statutory, that a tenant agrees to at least 2 mid-term inspections per annum, a tenant can not commence an AST Agreement without tenants insurance, a tenant must provide the LL with the governments guide on damp, mould and condensation and they should do a course on how to be a good tenant, rather than just turn up to collect keys, talking about they know their rights when they actually know nothing! APOLOGIES FOR THE LONG MESSAGE

From: Franklin I 06 June 2023 12:47 PM

I'm going through an eviction as I'm writing this message. I served notice on May 23rd, 2023 and tenant decided to not pay rent due on the 28th. Regardless, all Landlord's should follow the correct protocol, take out Landlord's insurance, that covers for non payment of rent, malicious damage and possession orders, if tenant fails to vacate after 2 months of serving Section 21. With legal cover of up to £100K, we should not do anything that will incriminate or invalidate the Section 21 notice.

From: Franklin I 06 June 2023 12:15 PM

Landlord's also have an urgent appeal too, on mortgage tax relief!

From: Franklin I 30 May 2023 09:51 AM

As landlord's, it is compulsory for us to provide tenant's with the following; 1) How to rent guide 2) Landlord's gas safety certificate 3) Energy Performance Certificate 4) Deposit Protection Certificate and Prescribed information 5) Landlord's Licensing (If applicable) 6) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Letter/Notice 7) Tenancy Agreement/Addendum to add clauses 8) EICR Report 9) ICO membership registration In reference to all of the above, failure to implement any of the above can result in hefty fines. I thing it should be compulsory for all tenants to provide a copy of their insurance before commencement of any AST agreement and upon renewal of tenancy. My reason for this, is that if you have a furnished dwelling and an inventory checkout is conducted, any damages to the property/furnishings may not be covered by the deposit. Therefore, the tenant should cover any losses/damages from their insurance, based on the reports from the inventory check-out, mid-term inspection and deposit protection tribunal outcome. In addition to this, a mid-term inspection must be compulsory during the tenancy period, with a minimum of 2 inspection per annum, in order to validate any insurance claims. Lastly, all tenants should provide the landlords by law, with a copy of the guidelines recently published by the House of Commons, on how to deal with damp and mouldy housing, as in the link below; Helping tenants with damp and mouldy housing (England) (parliament.uk) This will create a level playing field and transparency on both sides of the fence, when the issue's surrounding mould gets out of control!

From: Franklin I 18 May 2023 07:25 AM

Well said, I couldn't agree more.

From: Franklin I 05 October 2022 08:09 AM

BTL will not benefit from this new Stamp Duty proposal. FTB's only!

From: Franklin I 24 September 2022 11:50 AM

Most LL's are pondering on the exit route and a lot are edging closer towards that decision each month.

From: Franklin I 28 June 2022 10:18 AM

Most opportunities in regards to properties have gone to the HMRC. Whatever opportunities LL's have or had are been restricted by the government and regulatory bodies. Any house price falls would be an opportunity for the FTB to get in before the interest rate hike.

From: Franklin I 20 June 2022 07:45 AM

You take away our 10% wear and tear, and replace it with a compulsory "Pets in Lets" policy. The government better start building its own homes for future tenant's, as the PRS future is looking more bleak each week!

From: Franklin I 17 June 2022 10:27 AM

Power swings to tenant's and more LL's swings to exit of BTL market. The beginning of end based on poor government decisions!

From: Franklin I 16 June 2022 08:37 AM

I would've appreciated if the heading for this title just said Prime Central London, Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, or just simply Kensington and I would've saved my time in reading. However, the return yields are great if you can afford it. I recently saw a parking space in Portman Road, London W1H selling for £750K. It will definitely sell for more than £750K!

From: Franklin I 16 June 2022 08:35 AM

Whilst we are talking about CGT, we must remember that when selling the property as a LL/BTL investor, the stamp duty, legal fees initially paid on the property will be returned back to you!

From: Franklin I 16 June 2022 08:21 AM

It seems like this maybe the last nail in the coffin for the good LL. Too much regulations, too much laws, too much pressure and a total lack of support has now made the BTL market look like a bad option. When you have a tenant on benefits and you apply for an eviction, the first thing the local council does, is to inform the tenant not to VACATE! This means three things; 1) One you have to apply for a County Court Judgement eviction 2) You have to pay for the bailiffs 3) This all costs money You'll not be compensated for your losses. When 85% of LL"s leave the Private Rented Sector, the government will create a new reform that will be applied with commonsense that protects both tenant's and LL's not the one that exposes the LL to every conceivable element of RISK!

From: Franklin I 16 June 2022 05:47 AM

If property prices were to rise significantly today or within the next year by a minimum of 25%, most LL's would look at this as a get out of jail free card. The government continues to make the BTL less attractive for professional LL's each year.

From: Franklin I 15 June 2022 17:22 PM

Interesting to know, but that doesn't apply in prime central London.

From: Franklin I 15 June 2022 17:15 PM

Agents are only good for sourcing a tenant (Lettings only). Anything after that, then you're looking for trouble! An agent will fully manage your property for you, and give you the sales pitch that if the tenant's stop paying, they will collect the rent and evict the tenants. In reality, when this does happen, they'll only tell you to issue a section 21 yourself. You're better off getting compensation from your Landlord's insurance, for damages, loss of rent and court costs, than to pin your hopes on an estate agent.

From: Franklin I 23 April 2022 21:07 PM

It was the same Tories that introduced the BTL for LL's. The same ones that introduced diesel vehicles, then later charges us all as pollutants to the environment. There was an old song called "video killed the radio star" by The Bugles. Well, the BTL killed the first time buyer's, but it's no fault of the LL's. LL's have been hit left right and centre, whilst the estate agents seat quietly as if butter wouldn't melt in their mouths. All I can say to Charlotte Gill, is "Hit me baby one more time," and you'll see what happens!

From: Franklin I 05 January 2022 09:00 AM

Some Letting agents are good, and some are just corrupt! The question to the title of this heading is; Are letting agents doing a good enough job for landlords? My answer to this question is NO! If agents were doing a good job for Landlord's, they would've taken responsibility for the Landlord's Tenant's Fee ban in which they the agent implemented to the Tenant's and not the Landlord's in the Tenant's Fee Act 2019. In addition to the above comments, LL's are sometimes charged an additional fee from agent's just to renew a Tenancy Agreement. They claim after 1 year of the Tenancy Agreement, that they've done their work. If I pay you £1,500 in fees for securing a tenant on a 12 months contract from September 2020 to September 2021, an agent should not expect a LL to pay another £1,500 just because the LL wishes to renew. If the tenant were to move out after 2 months of the renewal, the agent will not give a partial refund for the time served!

From: Franklin I 25 August 2021 06:58 AM

After applying all these charges on LL's in the past 3 to 5 years, from stamp duty increase, tax relief, Landlord's Licensing, Tenant's Fee Act, you name it, we've had it and now they want our help.

From: Franklin I 04 August 2021 06:15 AM

💯 Matthew Payne

From: Franklin I 28 July 2021 17:33 PM

Oh well, so much for the Tenant's Fee Act 2019. Viewing 5 properties, would cost the average tenant £150. The Tenant Fees Act bans most letting fees and caps tenancy deposits paid by tenants in the private rented sector in England. Estate agent's charge these fees to Tenant's and the LL's pay the penalty for the agent's greed at a later date!

From: Franklin I 28 July 2021 07:31 AM

It maybe cheaper in the long term for the government to make a better proposal to portfolio LL's who offer a minimum of 5 properties as a 5 year leaseback deal to the government. These tenants, will then be able to let at social rent levels or allow the properties to be used as accommodation for homeless families. A proposal such as this, would have to benefit all LL's financially in terms of Landlord's Licensing, Tax relief, EICR Certificates, EPC Certificates, Changes to private residence relief in the event a LL decided to sell part of a portfolio in comparison to any deal a LL currently has on the table today. In short, their must be tax incentives applied for a LL in order for this to work, so that it can benefit all sides, Tenant's housing, government's budget/targets and LL's pocket!

From: Franklin I 15 July 2021 07:34 AM

Interesting decision made by the government over the local council. The local council will now have to claw back these lost funds through parking restrictions, the School Streets Programme – camera-enforced closing of streets outside schools etc

From: Franklin I 13 July 2021 08:08 AM

What did the government expect? 1. Tenant's fee act 2019 (fee's applied by Letting Agent's not LL's, but the LL's pay for it). 2. Mortgage interest tax relief changes 3. Section 21 eviction changes 4. Landlord Licensing 5. The new EPC rules - April 2020 6. The new EICR rules - 2020 7. 2 Stamp duty changes in 18 months for BTL investors/LL's (George Osborne) 8. Right to Rent checks 9. Capital Gains tax changes in private residency relief 10. The economy, Brexit, Covid-19 and government intervention on eviction bans during lockdown

From: Franklin I 06 July 2021 10:17 AM

Whilst this is a delicate topic, there is a slight difference in impact between a residential LL's eviction and a Commercial LL's. If the government were to allow Commercial LL's to evict their tenants, then this will inevitably see a rise in unemployment across the UK. If this were to happen, then many people will be jobless. At the same time if residential LL's were to be allowed to evict, then we will have a homeless issue. The government will need to create a package that compensates these Commercial LL's, because come March 2022, there will be a rise in unemployment if the issue is not resolved.

From: Franklin I 18 June 2021 07:40 AM

Tenancy application fraud can involve Estate Agents. Back in 2007, I registered my property for Let, with a reputable Estate Agent. After doing the reference checks, all appeared to be copacetic. The tenant was a chauffeur according to the Estate Agent. The Tenant even paid 6 months rent upfront. After meeting the tenant for the first after checking in/collecting keys, I learnt that the tenant was a mini cab driver and not a chauffeur as the Estate Agent had previously implied. After 6 months, the tenant who had 2 dependants at the time, now approached me with a proposal. She advised that she thinks she's entitled for Housing Benefit. She still had the same job and her circumstances had not changed! I advised the tenant, that when she took this property, she knew well in advance that she wanted to apply for Housing Benefit after a certain period. In short, this was an Application fraud to get in through the back door

From: Franklin I 21 May 2021 13:05 PM

From the likes of us LL's Kilo Charlie!

From: Franklin I 03 March 2021 14:56 PM

As LL's switch from individual BTL ownership/mortgages and start trending towards Limited Company mortgages, they decide to increase the tax on that one, from 19% to 25% by 2023. I've no doubt, that by 2023 they'll increase that from 25% again!

From: Franklin I 03 March 2021 14:54 PM

Sometimes, you have the option of handing over the property to the council, even with the £10,000 grant. Inventory checks are done, and the council will be responsible for any repairs or damages. The rent will normally be slightly less in these circumstances. Some councils have been known to offer LL's up to £4,500 just for taking a tenant from the council list.

From: Franklin I 27 February 2021 17:22 PM

This is a serious human rights breach. Whilst we may complain about LL's Licensing, it is solely to prevent Rogue LLs like these from causing death by negligence to their tenant's. It's for these reasons, we now have to provide valud up to date NICR certificates on each Tenancy Renewal. This is a good thing for tenants and good LL's will always comply for the purpose of reassuring tenant/s that they're living in a safe environment!

From: Franklin I 24 February 2021 06:37 AM

We do an excellent job on convicting Rogue Landlord's, but the Rogue Estate Agent's continue to get away with murder!

From: Franklin I 24 February 2021 06:23 AM

This Estates Angency industry needs a serious overhaul in terms of regulation. It is riddled with corruption, scams and schemes!

From: Franklin I 24 February 2021 06:20 AM

And the Estate Agent's are innocent of these crimes?

From: Franklin I 24 February 2021 06:18 AM

Profit from income, is profit from income. All of which, is tax deductible. There are no exemptions and whoever things otherwise, is totally naive and needs to seek urgent financial advice before it's too late!

From: Franklin I 16 February 2021 12:36 PM

The fact that a tenant is looking for a place to rent on Craigslist, rather than Right Moves, Zoopla, On The Market, Primelocation or any other reputable lettings agent platform is an indication that they're also part of the problem. They're not exactly victims!! We have simple laws in place that protects tenant's rights from Rogue LL's. These are the same similar laws that protects our consumer rights for purchasing goods and services under section 75! These laws do not necessarily protect one from cash transactions, bitcoins or sexual favours as an exchange currency in return for goods/services provided outside of the norm. Whilst I don't condone the actions of these LL's, we must understand that a professionally referenced tenant can rent a property legally from any of us LL's and use the premises as a brothel or base for escort services. Who then becomes the victim in this scenario? If Peter Kyle wishes to enforce laws on these practices, is Peter Kyle going to include the existing commercial LL's in Soho, London’s W1 area? Whilst these PRS LL's are being made to look like Pimps, of some sort, imposing 3% stamp duty, removing LL's tax relief, adding Landlord's Licensing, Tenant's Fee Act 2019 etc is a form of legalised pimping at the expense of LL's!

From: Franklin I 05 January 2021 03:18 AM

If you're a good LL, this app shouldn't be an issue. However, if you’re a rogue LL then this app will be a dream for all tenants and a nightmare for you!

From: Franklin I 11 December 2020 03:44 AM

In all honesty John, I think most of the rogue Landlord's are oblivious to these guidelines, hence the reason why they get hefty fines! Ignorance is a disease, education is the cure! Some people choose to live and learn the hard way!

From: Franklin I 10 December 2020 16:14 PM

In reference to the above heading 'Gas boilers may be next problem issue hitting landlords'. This is more related to an EPC rating, so if by 2021, it would be illegal for a Landlord to have a rating higher than an 'E' and by 2025 a rating higher than a 'C', it would be in our best interest to consider the long term options of government grants for Air Source Heat Pumps as an alternative to replacing gas boilers which are less energy efficient!

From: Franklin I 10 December 2020 14:24 PM

I wouldn't call these type of people LL's Sandra. They're just a bunch of cowboys who believe that in their own fantasy world, they're smarter than the system. This will send a message out to all those rogue "cowboys" giving us a bad name.

From: Franklin I 29 November 2020 12:41 PM

In short, the moral of the story, is that if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen! Yes, I agree with you, in the sense that we as LL's have been hit extremely hard. The Tenancy fee ban in June 2019, was one example in which we were forced to comply and refund a weeks rent to our tenant's. The increase in stamp duty for BTL investors plus the additional charge as a second home, was another blow. The only problem I had with the Tenancy fee ban, was that it should've been entitled, "The Estate Agency's Fee Ban", as I don't know any LL who charges these fees directly to a tenant. The Estate Agency's profited from these fee's and not the LL. In addition to all of that, I'm aware of the scrapping of tax relief, the new EPC ratings for LL that have to be met in March 2021. I hear your comments, and based on all of the above HMO comments, I'd consider Airbnb to offset any losses, subject to mortgage approval/council approval etc.

From: Franklin I 28 November 2020 21:56 PM

I don't see why a LL would try and evade paying for a L/Licensing Certificate. Once the council authorises it, it becomes statutory and mandatory law. Assuming that you were applying for a S21, you'll have to provide proof of EPC, How To Rent Guide, Landlord's Gas Safety Certificate (If applicable), Tenant's Deposit Protection Certificate/Prescribed Information, EICR Certificate, Landlord's Licensing Certificate (If applicable to your Borough) etc etc. All your basically saying to any respectable tenant, is that your a fit and proper person, and your rental home has a valid MOT certificate in the form of a Landlord's Licensing Certificate. Lastly, a £2,500 fine is small change to Judith Korkar Odompleh, 64, of Sunningdale Avenue in Barking, who was fined £40,000 (FORTY THOUSAND POUNDS), for failing to apply for a Landlord's Licensing Certificate. Maybe the council should've included Landlady's Licensing Certificate as she may have thought she was exempt!

From: Franklin I 28 November 2020 18:24 PM

Lets of 12 months payment in advance works well with company let's. I'm unsure how this business model will work with the average tenant. For example. A 2 bed flat in London (not zone 1-2) rents for £1,500/month @ £18,000 per annum. Who is actually funding the advance payment? Will the tenants AST Agreement have a break clause? If so, then who would be responsible for the shortfall halfway through a 12 month contract? A lot of questions needs to be asked. Whist it may sound good, is it too good to be true!

From: Franklin I 20 November 2020 14:45 PM

More woes for the tenant's when getting credit scored then! Just like having a "Pay Day Loan" search on your credit file, this will only do more damage in the long term for a tenant seeking to rent in the future.

From: Franklin I 08 October 2020 12:40 PM

Extremely light. I've seen £40,00 + fines, for flouting the Landlord's Licensing Laws.

From: Franklin I 03 October 2020 19:55 PM

If you're a good landlord, you'll not have a problem with tenants legislation. Every landlord should be transparent at every stage when adhering to requirements of their tenants. If you're a member of NLA or RLA, let the tenants know. If the government has made a recent announcement on tenant fee bans from 6 weeks to 5 weeks, then notify your tenants inadvance and refund the difference back from their initial deposit.

From: Franklin I 17 July 2019 09:40 AM

Breaking News