x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
mike's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
mike hardy
449
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
mike's wall
mike's
Recent Activity
For many multiple sharers isn't an option or desired. Given legislation isn't passed, and generally that a specific contract between two parties will overrule a general policy, its a precaution worth taking and relatively easy to do.
From:
mike hardy
02 October 2019 12:09 PM
It would at give something to defend in court. A tenant signing away their in a specific contract v a general government policy. Without it, theoretically a government can put this policy in and you would have little redress.
From:
mike hardy
01 October 2019 17:28 PM
seems poorly thought out, especially since a/ RTB caused the shortage of council houses b/ its easy to add a clause to contracts which tenant gives up any right to buy under RTB c/ fair price is not defined and hence will be subject to legal clarification
From:
mike hardy
01 October 2019 17:16 PM
Right to buy has caused the current lack of Council houses so its fiscally naïve to try and enforce it on the private sector. I believe this is just a flag waving exercise as there are no facts (specifically to define what is a "fair price"). That said all my contract renewals will have a specific clause where the tenant formally gives up any right to buy that may come to pass. Then I have something to use to challenge in the courts.
From:
mike hardy
01 October 2019 11:13 AM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Gove Hits Back! He says Reform Bill is STILL a Renting Revolution
Rehashed research again slams MPs who are landlords
Surprise move as agents issue ‘how to complain’ guide to tenants
Where to find tenanted buy to let units for investors to purchase
Renters Reform Bill U-turn by tenant activists
Renters Reform Bill now on its way to the House of Lords
Generation Rent activists spurn Reform Bill olive branch from NRLA
Activists line up to criticise Renters Reform Bill amendments
Renters Reform Bill - these are the amendments to watch
Last ditch bid by officers to save council landlord licensing
mike's Recent Activity
From: mike hardy
02 October 2019 12:09 PM
From: mike hardy
01 October 2019 17:28 PM
From: mike hardy
01 October 2019 17:16 PM
From: mike hardy
01 October 2019 11:13 AM