x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
award
award award
award award

OTHER GUIDES & TIPS

Landlords Push On with Green Upgrades despite government U-turn

Almost four in 10 portfolio landlords are continuing to upgrade their properties to EPC C or above, despite proposed regulations being scrapped by the government.

Research by Paragon Bank, a prominent lender in the buy to let space, also found that an additional 32% of portfolio landlords hold only properties rated EPC C or above. 

However, some landlords are more reluctant to upgrade their properties in the absence of direction from government, with 16% postponing undertaking any works until legislation mandating EPC C or above is introduced. One in 10 state that the proposed rule change has no bearing on their portfolio strategy.

Advertisement

Those undertaking improvement works shared their anticipated timescales for completion, with 28% expecting to reach EPC C across their portfolios within one to two years and 22% in three to four, the two most common responses. 

This was followed by 18% who expect to finish green upgrades within the next 12 months and a similar proportion, 17%, who feel it will take them five years or more to hit the previously mooted targets.

Nearly 400 landlords with four or more properties were asked to share their plans in light of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announcing that proposed changes to the current Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards would be scrapped. 

The proposed regulations would have required all properties let for new tenancies to have a minimum Energy Performance Certificate rating of C by April 2025, extending that to all tenancies by 2028.

Government data shows that the energy performance of properties in the private rented sector now outperforms owner-occupied homes. The English Housing Survey shows that 44.9% of PRS properties have an EPC of A-C, compared to 43.3% in owner-occupation. The data shows that 2.18 million PRS properties were at EPC A-C in 2022, up from 830,000 a decade earlier.

Richard Rowntree, managing director of mortgages at Paragon Bank, says: "It’s encouraging to see portfolio landlords continuing to enhance their properties so they meet EPC C or higher, despite the proposed regulations being shelved.  

“These landlords will join almost a third more who have carried out sustainability focused upgrades or purchased property already benefitting from energy saving technology, highlighting the commitment amongst portfolio landlords to improve the standard of privately rented homes for tenants.”

And Louisa Sedgwick, Paragon Bank commercial director of mortgages, adds: “We often see landlords release capital from existing properties in their portfolio to fund expansion or property upgrades. With mortgages rates lower than last year, we are seeing increased interest in remortgaging across the market to support landlord growth ambitions.”

You can see Paragon’s new Portfolio Landlord Report 2024 here.

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

Join the conversation

  • icon

    It’s common sense to improve the quality of rental assets to ‘Running Cost’ EPC Grade C and ‘CO2 Pollution’ EPC Grade C. The evidence that it delivers rental and capital appreciation has been clear for years.

    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Here He Is…!

     
    icon

    Gibbons’ gibberish is back. Like SBR and JT he just cannot take a hint. 😉

     
    icon

    You’re back 🙏🏻 🎉, I have actually missed you 😂🤷‍♂️

     
    icon

    Simon. you mean in the same way you miss toothache?

     
    icon

    Utter rubbish. I have an EPC D that says if I spend £600 to insulate the party wall it will generate a £25 per year saving, or if I spend £6000 to insulate the floor it will save £25 per year. Is £25 per year going to make anyone's rental decision any different, especially when there is a shortage. People will rent what they can get in a saturated market.

     
  • icon

    I almost agree with Gibbons - but the reason to improve the EPC rating is because a new Govt is likely to bring back the target of EPC C. The fact that the EPC is an extremely flawed algorithm has not changed & its effects on 'rental & capital appreciation' have yet to be proved to me!

  • George Dawes

    When you can change lightbulbs but the rest of the house is falling apart to get an improved epc , which happened to a house near me , it makes a mockery of the whole epc and the farcical green agenda

    Sorry Mr G but you’re talking utter drivel as usual

    icon

    And when you can improve the EPC by removing electric heaters and replace with a gas boiler. Surely it is time that the EPC emphasis was shifted to CO2 rather than running cost. For me to spend money to get my EPC D houses to a C with a 200 year payback period is ridiculous. We will be selling another house this year probably followed by a coach house flat next year or when the tenant moves out, that leaves one more that our son might move into at which point we are out.

     
  • icon

    Erm Nope 👎🏻😂😂, my plans haven’t changed, if C comes in….. my tenants will be visiting the Travel-lodge group of hotels a little more than they wanted too 😬😬

  • icon

    I've always done as much as economically possible to upgrade our houses after we buy them, and this is before the EPC C came in.
    However, I refuse to spend 3 years rent to upgrade some of them from a D to a C as due to construction type it is not worth upgrading them. I've already offered them to the tenants to see if they want to buy them, but they are not in a position to buy and dont want to move out.

    So they will just be sold when Labor get in. I'll get more money in interest from my bank than I make in rent. Will be sad to evict good tenants but I will be left with no choice, other than sell at a loss.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up