By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by Emma Lunn

UK landlords are at risk of overestimating the profitability of their buy-to-let investment by neglecting to take into account key running costs, according to research by a property firm.

Platinum Property Partners (PPP) says the total potential cost associated with the annual running and upkeep of a BTL property – including letting agent fees, maintenance, repairs, marketing fees and mortgage interest – amounts to an average of £8,359. 

However, it claims almost one in eight (12%) landlords do not take any costs into consideration when calculating the financial performance of their BTL portfolio, leaving them particularly vulnerable to misjudging the returns they will make from their investment.

PPP says that based on a typical portfolio of two rental properties, the total bill associated with running a BTL portfolio could stack up to £16,718 every year, which in turn equals 52% of gross annual rental income (£32,388). 

The most accurate way to measure the performance of a BTL investment is by using ‘Return on Investment’ or ‘Return on Equity’, as these methods take into account gross profit, capital gain, and the costs of running the property – including the amount spent on refurbishment.

PPP claims the majority of landlords ignore the impact of void periods on their rental income despite void periods being inevitable for landlords at some stage.

Steve Bolton, founder and chairman of Platinum Property Partners (PPP) said: “The buy-to-let market is a hot ticket investment at the moment for budding landlords looking to generate an income and good level of capital growth from rental property. This is particularly the case now that new pension freedoms have opened the gates to alternative financial plans for retirement.

“But becoming a landlord isn’t a walk in the park, and running a successful BTL portfolio takes continued investments of time and money on top of your initial lump sum investment. Many landlords appear to be burying their heads in the sands and are seriously in the dark about the ‘true’ value of the returns from their BTL investment if they don’t take into consideration regular outgoings such as letting agent fees, repairs, redecoration costs, and mortgage interest. Property investors need to keep note of all these additional expenses to make sure they are evaluating their returns rigorously, as that’s the only safeguard to check if they’re still on course to achieve their goal of retirement income or to supplement or replace their salary. 

“If landlords don’t have all the information at their fingertips, they can’t properly assess market risk and opportunities to make informed decisions about the future of their portfolio, or plan effectively. It also makes it extremely difficult to compare the performance of a BTL portfolio against other forms of investment.”



  • icon

    This is something I have been explaining to people for a very long time. I have been a property owner for over 29 years, and have seen many people make mistakes regarding profitability of a rental property.

    One thing you all fail to mention is that there is a cost element for your actual services - you should deduct an amount for running your properties. Unless of course, you think you should be working for nothing!

    • 30 April 2015 20:44 PM
  • icon

    I'm just renovating a £150k property in Coventry.. full rewire, new kitchen, bathroom, plastering and heating.. £30k. I think a landlord has to get at least 8% yield to cover fees, insurance and repairs (never had a tenant that hasn't wrecked something). I also have a £350k in Suffolk. New build.. the yield for that is 4% £14.4k but I'm reluctant to rent it and just want rid as new capets, paint/decorating kitchen could wipe out a years rent.. really not worth it and its in a nice family area just voted No.2 inthe UK . Kesgrave

    • 29 April 2015 10:51 AM
  • icon

    That's so true. People get sucked in by watching glossy programmes like Homes Under The Hammer which concentrates on the nice bits like profit, tenants moving in and newly refurbished homes. They don't mention the potential voids, the repairs and the general upkeep of properties. So I can imagine a lot of people getting a rude awakening!!

    • 29 April 2015 09:08 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal