A community led research project released today has analysed the “imminent housing crisis” in Tower Hamlets and its effect on local citizens.
The researchers, from Queen Mary University of London, argue that Tower Hamlets is in the midst of a battle against unaffordable rents, unethical landlords and uninhabitable housing conditions. The report says residents of the borough are at the forefront of London’s looming housing crisis, facing the brunt of the impact of rising rents and a lack of investment in quality, affordable homes.
The report provides a list of action points for the consideration of Tower Hamlets Council and the winner of the forthcoming Mayoral elections.
Commissioned by Tower Hamlets Citizens – a local alliance of community groups and institutions, and a branch of national community organising charity, Citizens UK – 22 volunteer researchers from the local area worked in collaboration with the School of Geography at Queen Mary University of London to speak to over 300 households about their living conditions.
Their project, Tower Hamlets: A report on the housing crisis in one of London’s most expensive boroughs was authored by Liam Harney, an MA student in Community Organising. It found that:
• Private tenants have reported being intimated and threatened with eviction by the landlord if they complained about the quality of their home.
• 65% of homes surveyed have damp, with harmful impacts on the health of children, parents and the elderly. Some people have had to abandon living space because of damp.
• 67% of respondents have had rent increases within the last 12 months.
• Just 40% of households expect to be living at the same address in three years’ time.
• Only 23% think that their children will be able to afford to start a family in Tower Hamlets when they grow up.
Queen Mary University of London, professor of human geography, Jane Wills said: “The results provide a snapshot of the housing crisis in Tower Hamlets today and what this means for the people who live here.
“The impact of poor quality housing is far reaching affecting residents health, mental well-being and relationships. This is particularly damaging for the most vulnerable groups in our communities such as children and the elderly.”
Based on this research, Tower Hamlets Citizens will be asking the Labour, Independent and Conservative candidates for Mayor of Tower Hamlets to commit to implementing four policy proposals should they win the local elections in May. These are:
• Establishing a registry scheme, with code of conduct, for private landlords.
• Making available land for the development of permanently affordable community land trust homes.
• Charging a levy on ‘buy-to-leave’ property owners, and using the money raised to fix damp in people’s homes.
• Develop a ‘Living Rent’ model for the borough, where rent levels in the social-rented sector would be linked to average earnings instead of the market rate.
Zinebe Maach, Tower Hamlets Citizens leader and volunteer researcher, said: “The report presents the housing situation from the community’s point of view, not to feel sorry for ourselves or to apportion blame, but to prompt our politicians to act.
“The research includes testimony from individuals who demonstrate that this report is about more than statistics, the devastating effect of the housing crisis is crippling local people and denying them the right to create a safe home for their families.”
.png)
Comments
I am in complete agreement with Tim. I have been a landlord in Tower Hamlets for 14 years and this report doesn't reflect my experiences at all. It sounds to have been a very selective exercise to prove a 'problem' that may exist in only a minority of cases. I haven't increased my rents for a couple of years and am always quick to repond to and deal with any disrepair issues rny tenants may encounter. On only 1 occasion have I found damp to be due to an external source; usually it is entirely due to the tenants' own lifestyle, including failing to adequately ventilate the property and the use of banned bottled gas heaters. Educating tenants in how to avoid causing the problem in the first place is a better solution. If we end up being licensed then, for most, that will be another unnecessary cost to bear with no benefit to anyone.
Is a survey of 300 households out of a total of probably tens of thousands in the large borough a credible scientific survey? To extrapolate such minuscule data into headline grabbing siren calls for action is the political flavour of the moment without any serious research or proper checks of rigorous selection processes to ensure the data has any merit.
I would expect a fair amount of self selection by vested interest groups and political medalling by those that want to keep up the pressure on the PRS.
How about calling for the Borough of Tower Hamlet to carry out their statutory duties and using the plethora of existing legislation to stop vindictive eviction by halting Sect 21 notices, using HHSRS to its proper effect and imposing statutory improvement notices, Shelter et al properly advising tenant of their real rights and legal protection. There are more than enough powers at the disposal of the authorities right now but the elephant in the room is that they have no money allocated, or legal departments large enough to take miscreants to court. Central government needs to give the courts the posers to award meaning fines that can be used to fund these departments and to use the Proceeds of Crime act to force bad landlords to forfeit their properties to pay for crimes. Tarring the PRS with bad press is easier than actually doing something