The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) is calling for tax reforms to encourage and support more landlords to offer longer tenancies.
In its consultation launched in July, government proposed a number of options to implement a three-year tenancy model addressing the demand for longer tenancies from the growing numbers of families and older people in the private rented market.
One of these options proposes ‘financial incentives’ as called for by the RLA, which the government argues “could be quicker to implement” then mandatory three-year agreements.
It would also ensure that the vital flexibility the sector is good at providing is retained, enabling those wanting short-term tenancies to quickly access new work and educational opportunities.
In its submission to the Treasury ahead of the Budget on 29th October, the RLA is calling for tax relief on rental income which could increase each year a tenancy continues up to a maximum of five years if the tenancy is renewed. The relief would then remain at this level.
Alongside this, the RLA wants the government to develop its plans for a housing court to speed up justice for tenants and landlords if something goes wrong in a tenancy, especially long-term tenancies.
At a recent event hosted by the RLA, the Housing Secretary, James Brokenshire, confirmed that it will be consulting on a housing court in the next few months.
The RLA’s research exchange, PEARL, has found that 73% of landlords would offer longer-term tenancies with a combination of financial incentives and court reform to ensure that they have the confidence that where they provide a longer tenancy they can swiftly regain possession in cases such as tenants failing to pay their rent or committing anti-social behaviour.
David Smith, policy director for the RLA, said: “Landlords recognise the demand for longer tenancies which provide stability for tenants and landlords.
“Recent statements by MPs suggest that positive taxation to support longer tenancies would gain support in parliament, enabling such tenancies to become available far quicker than imposing them by law.
“We call on the Chancellor to back this pragmatic proposal.”
Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.