x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Another landlord hit with a fine thanks to unlicensed HMO

The landlord of a property in Northampton has paid a £2,750 civil penalty after failing to licence their HMO.

In December 2021 officers from West Northamptonshire council visited the property following complaints from the public.

The inspection identified that the three-bedroom property was being occupied by four people from two separate households. This made the property a licensable HMO under the council’s Additional Licensing regime.

Advertisement

A council spokesperson says: “People in Northampton are rightly angry about landlords willing to circumvent the rules which are there to protect their tenants and provide good living standards.

"This demonstrates that we will investigate reports of unlicensed HMO’s when people contact us, and that when the evidence is there, we will take a firm stance against those who operate HMOs without the appropriate licence.

"Property investment is a key legitimate part of our economy, but landlords must recognise that when they invest in homes for people to live in, they are becoming part of a community."

The inspection also identified offences under the Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006. 

The offences relating to the provision of information regarding the landlord or properties, maintenance of means of escape from fire, and maintenance of common parts of the property.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    4 People from 2 households, so 2 couples probably, hardly the worst offence, broke the rules on a technicality, did that really warrant that fine ?

  • icon

    I think it’s the Council that’s circumventing the rules, different rules for same human beings, if they are related by any stretch of the imagination they are exempt, are those rules made for or by Asians there is a likelihood of being related.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up