A group of rental activists in London claims that over 10,000 private rented homes in the borough of Brent have a serious health hazard.
It does not explain how it came to that figure but it says: “Damp and mould are making us sick, leading to asthma, respiratory issues, skin conditions, and mould poisoning. Our children’s health is in crisis because landlords are being allowed to get away with not keeping our homes safe. Damp and mould mean people can’t use some rooms, and are overcrowded in the others. This meant that Church End had the highest Covid death rate in the country.”
The campaigners are pressing Brent’s Labour-controlled council to come down harder and more frequently on rogue landlords - but it insists that to do so, the elected councillors must strike some sort of deal with the self-appointed LRU over the timescale for action.
They say: “Brent council has a legal duty to make sure our homes are safe but their current plan isn’t good enough. In the areas of Brent where housing is most dangerous, they’re only promising to deal with 10 per cent of the most serious problems this year. What about the other 90 per cent of renters left with unsafe homes?”
The LRU’s open letter to Brent council says: “We support Brent LRU’s plan for how the council can deal with the damp and mould crisis by taking action when landlords fail to keep our homes safe.
“Brent council must:
“- Agree a timeline with the London Renters Union for dealing with the 10,000 unsafe private rented homes in Brent, and recruit the staff to do it.
“- Ensure that Environmental Health cases can never be closed before sending a report on what has been done to the tenant and confirming it with them.
“- Make interpretation available for the PRS enforcement team, especially in , Arabic,Somali, Portuguese, Romanian, Urdu and Hindi.
“- Inspect ALL properties where a landlord has applied for a licence within 1 year, instead of 50% over 5 years.
“- Issue Improvement Notices that protect us from eviction while dealing with disrepair, and fine the landlords that refuse to fix up.”
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
Many PRS properties DO have serious health hazards. They're called tenants who don't open windows, break electrical fittings,locks etc. and don't cooperate with Landlords.
Even more social rental properties have serious health hazards, called tenants, incompetent councils and housing associations etc.
Many more social tenants are harmed or die due to their actions or their Landlords' inactions than in the PRS.
Activists should prioritise dealing with the actual problems instead of causing problems for decent tenants and landlords alike, whose interests are the same and harmed in equal measure.
Very well said Robert!
Well said. Most of the time it's tenants who are the problem.
"A group of rental activists in London have a serious issue making fraudulent accusations based on skewed survey information. National landlord group the NRLA has begun legal action against to the group to retract the misleading and false accusations." If only this were the case hey?
While Beadles About maybe he could nip to Brent and verify these claims? Amazing how LRU managed to get to 10,000 properties.
Smell of BS to me...
Beadle's about will not doubt "welcome" the activists BS.
IT'S tenants that make the homes unsafe
Andrew - very succinctly expressed!
It took me over 100 words to say the same!
Living in Brent is a serious health hazard
Asking a council to inspect properties that they charge a licence fee for? You're having a laugh! With most councillors still hiding at home, it's never going to happen. Anyway, councillors need to be looking at the social sector first!
Possibly instead of (or as well as) providing interpreters in multiple languages they could provide language lessons for the non-UK natives living in the area to learn the language of the country they have chosen to live in. Interpreters cost a fortune and I am not sure we would be provided with one if we chose to take up residence in any other country. We certainly weren't when I was working abroad.
Please login to comment