x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Landlord ignored Improvement Notices - now he's fined

Arun council has prosecuted a Littlehampton landlord for failing to comply with an improvement notice.

The case was heard at Worthing Magistrates Court where ’20 Clifton Road (Littlehampton) Freeholders Limited’ pleaded guilty to the offence of Failing to Comply with a Housing Act 2004 Improvement Notice. 

The court imposed a fine and a victim surcharge and awarded the council its legal and other costs, totalling more than £4,000.

Advertisement

During sentencing, the magistrates remarked on the repeated and unacceptable non-compliance with the Improvement Notice. 

They noted that the hazards identified had put occupants of the property at risk, the work to sort out the issues were not done quickly enough, and that despite the risks posed, the defendants hadn’t addressed the condition of the property, despite having proper channels to deal with these issues.

Councillor Carol Birch, chair of the housing and wellbeing committee, says: “Arun council’s private sector housing team investigates housing disrepair and associated matters in the private rented sector. Where safety issues or other risks are identified, they find the most appropriate solution to the matter. 

“The council will not hesitate to take formal action against people who don’t fulfil their legal duties and responsibilities. This may include prosecution or issuing of Civil Penalty Notices against the relevant parties.

“We hope that the sentence imposed by the court will also act as a deterrent to other landlords who fail to comply with housing law and who put the health and safety of tenants at risk. We also hope it encourages them to act responsibly in maintaining their rental properties to the required standards.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Why are you not naming these People ? 👨🏾

  • icon

    It sounds like the company was a freehold Association, and the tenant was a Leaseholder. If this is the case then all that happens is the leaseholders (tenants) will have to pay the fine imposed on their own Association.

    Finning landlords is not the way to go about dealing with disrepair. Empower the tenants or let the council do the repairs and take the cost of the rent. Finning the landlord does not necessarily mean the repairs will get done and where is the evidence Councillor Carol Birch that’s prosecution has ever been a deterrence?

    Ferey Lavassani

    The fine does not go to the HM treasury. It goes to the council's treasury. That is why they are keen in taking the matter all the way. I remember in the past if for example you had a blocked drainage and for some reason, such as being out of the country, it was not fixed. The local authorities used to fix them and send you the bill. If the bill was not paid, then they used to put a charge, through the land registry, on the title, and whenever the house went through conveyancing, the outstanding bill had to paid before the charge was lifted. But nowadays they want the money and want it now.

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up