x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Tax nightmare for landlords leads to huge rise in buy to let companies

Despite a sharp fall in the number of homes bought by landlords in 2023, the number of limited companies set up to hold buy to let properties continues to soar.  

Last year a record 50,004 limited buy to let companies were set up across the UK surpassing 2022’s previous record of 48,540 by three per cent. 

The data comes from lettings agency Hamptons, which describes 2023 as a year of two halves.  

Advertisement

In the first half of the year following the aftermath of the mini-budget, the number of new buy to let incorporations ran at around two per cent below the same period in 2022.  However, as more investors began to face higher mortgage rates, the number of limited companies set up to hold buy to lets picked up in the second half of 2023 to run at nine per cent above 2022 levels.

Scotland recorded the largest pick-up, with an 8.4 per cent year-on-year uplift in the number of new companies set up: this primarily reflects the bigger difference here in tax rates paid by individual landlords and limited companies.

A record 58 per cent of limited company buy-to-lets in the North East were held in a company that was set up outside the region, the highest proportion in any region. This reflects how landlords from across the UK are targeting higher yielding buy to lets, particularly in the North of England.

The rising number of incorporations means that at the start of 2024 there were 345,426 active limited companies designed to hold BTL property in the UK, up 11.6 per cent from 309,643 at the beginning of 2023.  Some 68 per cent of current companies had been set up between 2017 and 2023 when tax changes were phased in.

Overall, these companies own a total of 615,077 properties across England & Wales, an 82 per cent increase from the end of 2016 when landlords who were higher rate taxpayers started to see the share of mortgage interest they could offset from their tax bill for homes in personal names reduce.  However, companies set up after 2016 still only own 38 per cent of all buy to lets held in a limited company.

Of the 615,077 limited company buy-to-let properties, 458,838 - roughly 75 per cent - have a mortgage charge against them.  

The number of outstanding limited company mortgages has risen 10 per cent over the last 12 months, despite the total number of buy to let mortgages falling three per cent over the same period.  This also means that limited company landlords are more likely to have a mortgage than investors who own buy-to-let property in their personal name.

Most of the growth in buy-to-let incorporations over the last year has come from smaller landlords.  Over the last 12 months, there was a 21.9 per cent increase in the number of homes held in companies with a single property.  This compares to a 3.8 per cent increase in the number held by companies owning 20+ homes.

Companies owning 20+ homes were the only ones to see the number of mortgage charges increase faster than the number of homes, suggesting that these investors are leveraging up rather than reducing the debt on their portfolio.     

This means that limited companies set up to hold BTLs now account for 24 per cent of all properties held in any sort of limited company structure, up from 16 per cent in 2016.  Between 2016 and the end of 2023, the total number of properties owned by all limited companies, not just those set up to hold buy to let property, rose by 21 per cent.

Aneisha Beveridge, head of research at Hamptons, says: “Despite last year's slowing sales market, there was no let-up in landlords rushing to incorporate.  Rather, the record number of companies set up to hold buy to let homes suggests a long-term commitment from landlords - particularly given the upfront costs associated with incorporating.  The growth has been driven mostly by existing landlords moving properties into a corporate structure to shelter themselves from higher interest rates.  Meanwhile the number of new landlords setting up shop has remained relatively muted.

“For as long as landlords continue rolling off cheap fixed-term mortgages onto rates which are twice or triple what they were paying, the number of homes being put into a corporate structure will remain high.  The number of buy to let incorporations each year is likely to continue running in the region of 40,000-50,000 for the foreseeable future.  Longer term, the current tax regime could push half of all rental homes into a limited company, significantly reducing the existence of landlords who own buy-to-lets in their personal name.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    The problem for existing landlords longstanding with capital appreciation having accumulated is how to migrate to a limited company without suffering a large capital gains tax bill.
    No solution as far as I am aware exists to mitigate this. Any expert opinions welcome ?

    icon

    If your portfolio is big enough to be classed as a property business then the capital gains can be rolled into the shares. The properties are moved over in exchange for the shares and the deemed share price is calculated based off the original portfolio acquisition level.

     
    icon

    Chris

    Not sure I understand your answer

    Are you saying that if my portfolio originally cost £200k but is now worth £1 million then I can transfer it into shares and avoid the CGT on £800k?

    If so, presumably there will be corporation tax payable on an additional £800 k of gain when the limited company next revalues its portfolio or proportionately payable I n CGT when a proportion of its shares are sold?

    I accept the corporation tax and CGT payable for the limited company will be lower than personal income tax or CGT rates but I can't see there being a loophole that simply avoids or eliminates any taxable gain entirely.

     
  • icon

    That's right Ken. I looked into this a few years ago and was told that I'd have to sell my portfolio to my Ltd Co at MARKET value, resulting in a huge capital gains bill so in the end I decided not to bother. The benefits of operating under a Ltd Co are dwindling like everything else in this country and I'm sure once there's enough landlords operating this way the government will step in and start to fleece them just the way they have with landlords operating outside this scheme at the moment. After all, they can do what they like, fair or unfair to landlords and it seems there's not a thing we can do about it. Hence, why I'm leaving the game, selling my portfolio and will probably NEVER take on a new tenancy again. Ciao!

    icon

    Totally agree, they will get us whatever we do, we are sitting ducks . 🦆 As you are doing, I am out.

     
  • Peter Why Do I Bother

    It suits me to operate outside a ltd arrangement as I work abroad. My accountant said the way I am operating is the best as I would face a larger bill if incorporated.

    Grinds my gears to sell into a company and give the revenue a chunk of money to waste. If I could allocate where my money went then I would gladly pay it.

  • icon
    • A JR
    • 15 January 2024 10:53 AM

    I also operate from abroad and any CGT I pay is currently calculated from 2015 values, not from purchase date values, (most of mine were purchased in the 90’s.) This stemmed from George Osborne’s budget in 2015 when he (among other disasters) closed the then existing tax loop hole for ex pats. That said, it’s still a big advantage for those that purchased pre 2015.
    Even with the remaining expat advantage it’s not worth paying CGT to incorporate, money is hard to extract from a ltd and my guess is the Gov is herding in ltd LL’s to ‘rinse them’ in the near future.

    icon

    Yes as an expat I also enjoy the advantage of CGT calculations from 2015 values, one of the reasons we moved abroad. So far no CGT has been payable on the sale of our properties to date, but don't know how the reduced allowances will affect future sales until they happen. But has been really worth the move as we bought most of our properties between 1975 to 1995. Life in sun isn't bad either.

     
  • David Hollands

    We need the tax relief on mortgage interest rate for private landlords.

    Osborne’s budget in 2015 removed the tax relief this is not good for the landlords are the tenants.

  • icon

    Not worth selling your personal buy to let to incorporate. I set up my company in 2005. Since then most properties are bought into the company account. Some lenders do not remove the charge from the company, after paying them the capital so there is no mortgage on those properties. After more than 3 months of repayment of the mortgages and receipt of a letter stating that all the capital paid, I had to phone them to remove the charge at land registry and at the company's House. However, it takes time for them. Even paying capital is not an easy task as one way another they want extra day or day's interest. I suppose to donate to Generation RANT. I decided no more borrowing from them. Also selling property owned by company means no tax allowance, pay 25% and taking money out of the company means more tax to pay. There are ways around that, but still rather sell property from personal buy to let, even 40%. What I would like to see is the capital gain tax to be paid to the tax payer's choice of registered charity. Maybe possible to divert it.

  • icon

    Persistent paying tax is just legal theft. Councils charging license fees or any fees is a theft too. Strictly speaking they need to recognise that the landlords are doing their jobs so they should support LL and see how they could educate the tenants to look after their home and in so doing provide incentives for landlords to reduce the rents and this becomes a cyclical, where everyone wins. Currently what the council, charities and government working against the landlords means loss for all parties. Such a shame!!

  • icon

    AJR and Williams have done right. I would like to stay abroad and sell our 2 properties in personal name. The rest are in company name. Last 6 years I have sold all personal properties, except 2. So overall outstanding mortgages are about 40 to 45%. Concentrating in paying off our huge residential mortgage.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up