x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Supply of rental stock falls

The supply of rental housing stock on letting agents’ books fell in March, to the lowest level since the start of last year, according to the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) March Private Rental Sector (PRS) report.
 
Demand also dropped in March; ARLA agents had 33 prospective tenants registered per branch on average, down 11% from 37 in February. This stands below the figure recorded in March last year – when agents registered 36 on average.
 
Supply has also fallen year on year. In March 2015, the average number of properties managed per branch was 192, which is down 12% this year with just 169 rental properties managed per branch – the lowest level since records began in January 2015.
 
It’s a brighter picture in Scotland, where agents had on average 273 properties on their books, and Yorkshire and Humberside, where 207 properties were recorded on average per branch. In London however, agents had just 122 properties on their books per branch.

In March, two thirds (65%) of ARLA agents predicted that current and prospective BTL landlords will walk away from the market following the April stamp duty changes, causing a decrease in the supply of rental properties. Rent costs rose in March for a third of tenants (32%), and three in five (61%) ARLA members fear they will increase further as a result of the changes – a growing sentiment since last month, when 57% of agents agreed on this. 
 
ARLA managing director David Cox said: “We don’t expect falling supply to stop here – the recent stamp duty changes are very likely to cause supply to decrease even further, as landlords withdraw from the market.

“Not only do our agents predict that rent costs will increase further, but rental homes may also face a decline in quality over time, as landlords struggle to keep up with maintenance costs alongside the higher stamp duty charge. Whilst landlords adjust to the increase in costs we can expect to see one of three outcomes prevailing in the buy to let market: landlords absorbing the cost and taking the hit; landlords withdrawing from the market causing supply to fall; or landlords regaining those costs through hiking rents. Next month we can start to assess the damage.”

  • icon

    Good grief, it's not the extra stamp duty that's the killer. It's the effects of C24. That's what's going to cause rents to rise and landlords to sell up. The extra stamp duty is certainly a cost but it can be factored in. C24 can't and is going to do massive damage to the country's tenant's finances. Osbo's tenant tax will wreak havoc!

    Brit Sixteen Sixty Four

    First time buyers will simply buy the ex investor homes and not need to rent. C24 policy is rent demand neutral, the homes won't be left empty or bulldozed.

     
  • icon

    I agree the stamp duty is a fixed non recurring cost. The problem begins this year with the abolition of the 10% wear and tear allowance followed on by the erosion of the mortgage interest relief to its extinction. This creates a situation whereby landlords with substantial debt will have to eliminate that debt at the expense of investment in the properties.

  • icon

    Brit Sixteen Sixty Four is typical of the naive and uninformed comments we have come to expect from the average member of the public.

    I rent property in London. The average 2-bed-flat here is now going for around £400k (and I'm not talking central London either). If I were to sell my rental properties, they would not go to first time buyers. Because the average first time buyer will never be able to afford them. Instead they will go to foreign investors with corporate lets and non-resident tax status.

    First time buyers, my backside.

icon

Please login to comment

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit
sign up