x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Over £30k in fines for landlord who let dangerous home

A landlord has been found guilty of three housing offences after it was discovered a property he let out posed a serious health and safety risk to his tenants.

Grzegorz Surminski let a six bedroom property in Leamington Spa through Golden Key Letting Agents and was subletting the property to eight sub-tenants when the property was inspected by Warwick council officers in February this year.

The property was reported to the council for disrepair by one of the sub-tenants. 

Advertisement

However Surminski had not applied for an HMO licence and on inspection it was found there was no working smoke detection, no fire doors in the property, no fire blanket in the kitchen or fire extinguishers in the property – all legal requirements for an HMO property.

As well as the lack of fire safety provisions, there were numerous repair issues also found including unsafe electrics, lack of a working shower and broken floor tiles in the bathroom. 

A tenant was provided with a mouldy mattress to sleep on, and there were large accumulations of rubbish in the rear garden as well as insufficient wheelie bins for the size of the household.

Surminski was found guilty at Coventry Magistrates Court and fined a total of £31,300.

He also received a £1,000 fine for failure to provide written information to the council regarding the ownership and occupation details of the property. He was additionally ordered to pay a £150 victim surcharge and £150 costs.

The property has since been vacated and is now empty.

A council spokesperson says: “This landlord has flouted the laws which are there to protect the most vulnerable members of society who were placed at serious risks to their health and safety.

“It is reassuring that the courts recognise the gravity of these offences, and it is hoped that the level of fine handed out will be a strong deterrent to others who may be tempted to let a property in this way.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Why are the victim surcharge and costs so low? Seems out of proportion.

  • icon

    Grzegorz Surminski

  • icon

    The landlords are the victims.

  • icon

    The Article doesn’t who was doing the Sub-letting and why no action of fines for them.
    This is only to be expected when landlords are made powerless, not allowed to run their business and excluded from the property.
    He gets this fine because of previous Regulation’s causing the problem.
    The ownership issue, who has better access to the land
    Registry data than the Council a click of a button but a fine is the order of the day.
    Didn’t say who put the rubbish in the back garden it seems to be a + for Tenants to do this it strengthens their case.

  • icon

    The Article is not clear as to who was subletting , Was it a rent to rent ? Also has a council /Housing Association just breached the law on 2000 properties with no penalties.

  • icon

    £30’000.00 is a lovely bit of money for the Council’s it seems to be standard practice a nice round figure, far better for them than having to earn it.
    This Rent 2 Rent sham there are thousands of those who can sublet and over crowd with impunity, the landlord is always the fall guy easy his name is on the Title. So if Council’s are so concerned about health &
    safety why not order landlord to spend £30k improving the property instead of filling their own pockets.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up