x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Pets In Lets - pressure group wants more protection for landlords

A group wanting pets to be allowed in private rental properties says its research shows the issue is not opposition from landlords, but an absence of protection.

The National Office of Animal Health says it has conducted three-month surveys with landlords and tenants.

In both cases it asked a range of questions to understand how pet ownership in rentals could be achieved, and to learn of previous experiences from both groups.

Advertisement

NOAH’s new report finds that whilst landlords have concerns about renting to tenants with pets, 28 per cent of landlords were in favour of improving access to pets in rental properties if better protections for landlords are introduced, whilst a further 18 per cent supported access to pets in rental properties generally. 

A further 53 per cent stated that pet ownership is important, compared to only three per cent who stated it was not.

NOAH describes as “most telling” that 70 per cent of landlords felt that more protections need to be in place for landlords that do allow tenants to keep pets. 

One respondent said that the Tenant Fees Act (2019) - which restricts landlords to take a five-week maximum deposit in all cases - had meant they were unable to continue letting to pet owners as this deposit simply would not cover the costs associated with pet damage if caused.

NOAH says appropriate options could include allowing an increased deposit to be taken to specifically cover pet damage or charging tenants an increased rental rate or ‘pet premium’ or allowing an insurance policy to be taken out to cover damage caused by pets.

The ability to retain the option to choose whether or not to allow pets was important to many according to the report, which highlights that landlords sometimes do not allow pets due to concerns about the suitability of a specific property for pet health and wellbeing, as opposed to misgivings about pets in general.

NOAH has welcome the proposals from the Boris Johnson government, contained in the Renters Reform White Paper with plans to allow tenants to request to own a pet in a rental property, which under new rules, landlords cannot unreasonably refuse.

The White Paper also proposes to reform the Tenant Fees Act to enable landlords to request tenants to purchase pet insurance as part of their rental agreement, a measure that was supported by 17 per cent of respondents to NOAH’s survey.

NOAH chief executive Dawn Howard says: “Owning a pet has significant benefits for human health – both physical and mental – yet it has historically been very challenging in the UK to rent with a pet in private accommodation.

“Despite what is believed, our own research has shown that many landlords are not necessarily against allowing pets as long as their assets are protected. 

“This finding backs up the changes being proposed in the Renters Reform White Paper and should encourage the Government to move forward with the proposals at pace.

“The additional protection set to be introduced will ensure that responsible pet owners can keep a pet in their rental home, meanwhile landlords can rest assured that any pet damage that may be caused during the tenancy is covered through a pet insurance policy.

“In all, the Government’s proposed rental reforms represent a positive move for responsible pet owners in the rental sector, and a win for landlords who can now widen their pool of rental tenants whilst being fully insured against any potential pet damage.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Living next door to someone's bored, lonely, distressed dog that whines, barks or howls all day can be extremely stressful for neighbours.
    A great many rental properties are flats or terraced houses that are totally unsuitable for pet ownership (other than maybe a goldfish).

    I do actually have 2 properties with pets, so I'm not 100% opposed but have certainly had numerous complaints from my tenants about the noise from neighbouring dogs in other properties.

  • icon

    This article certainly softens the hard reality we have experienced whereby we were “not chosen” on all 16 houses we viewed in 7 months despite being model tenants, excluding many other properties we enquired about on Facebook Market Place and with agencies - “sorry no pets” was the tune they all sang in harmony. The few who would consider pets would charge a rip off “ pet rent” so if you rent for years per house then landlords can make a lot of money off you over the years on top of already high rents. Only one landlord permitted us to rent their house without hesitation and she rents direct rather than through an agency. We are moving house next Mon 17th. My personal experience has been that if you are looking to rent and an agency has their dirty hands on it, it’s guaranteed (from our experience) you won’t get the house. I knew a few months ago that if we didn’t find a landlord we could meet in person then we were doomed to homelessness.

    icon

    I'm glad you've found somewhere Paul.
    I use an agent, a good agent that works for both landlord and tenant
    ''Rip off pet rent'' you can blame government for that, it used to be an additional deposit that a good tenant would get back in full, not allowed anymore

     
    icon

    So glad you found somewhere, Paul!

     
    icon

    Due to unscrupulous tenants ruining properties with their pets, many good LL’s including myself don’t allow pets.

    Despite my allergies 🤧, I used used to allow pets until a tenant’s ‘well trained’ pet went crazy, resulting in multiple anti social behaviour warning and threats of legal cases from the neighbors & council to the landlord, ultimately eviction of the tenant and a damaged property costing over £10k in repairs & redecorations.

    Now it’s a permanent ‘no pets’ ‘humans only’ policy for tenant and landlord’s health and safety reasons.
    As a good landlord, neighbor, human helping to reduce homelessness- #nopetsinmyhomes is the standard policy. I will legally challenge anyone trying to enforce/ mandate ‘pets must be allowed’ in my properties.
    My human rights are above any animal rights, my decision who to allow to live, visit, use my properties.
    My property, bought with my money, my decision whether to allow humans, pets, aliens, anything else in my properties.

    For pets welfare, their owners and animal rights supporters need to have clear laws for all pet owners, be it for residential, or tenanted properties.
    #nopetsinrentedaccomodation
    #nopetsinsharedaccomodation
    #nopetsinapartmentblocks
    #nopetsinhomeswithoutgarden
    #petsonlyallowedinownhomewithgardenforanimalwelfare

     
    icon

    Sorry Paul.

    I would never accept your description of a model tenant being a pet owner.

    Too many real model tenants around for a pet owner to stand a chance of any high standard property.

     
    icon

    Paul sadly for you the rules of supply and demand apply. Currently Landlords are spoiled for choice. Given a choice of possible tenants, assuming all incomes were equal, what do you think would be the order of preference between; a single person, a couple, a couple with kids and a person(s) with a dog or cat. Although I have allowed existing tenants to get a dog, a dog or cat would be a negative when making comparisons.


     
    icon

    So in other words you’ve put your own family at risk of homelessness because you’ve been irresponsible in owning a pet that can cause damage whilst renting.
    Fellow LLs always use a good agent they will in the long run save your patience and money

     
  • George Dawes

    I certainly don't think a flat without a garden is good for the animal at all

    Ok for the selfish owners I guess

    icon

    Absolutely right, George.

     
    Jennifer Berezai

    Perfectly alright for an indoor cat!

     
  • icon

    Paul, 'rip off rent' I have a small studio flat I rent out for £800, sounds a lot. I have to pay a new mortgage of £450, this is interest only, so is not reducing my debt. Letting agent fees £120, Service charge and heating £100 (yes I pay for the tenants heating). That's £680 out of £800, leaving me with £120 to cover any expenses and maintenance, annual safety checks etc. The tenant has just informed me the washing machine has broken, that's going to cost me £500-£600. Finally when I sell the property I will have to pay Capital Gains tax of £10 to £15k. Also, as I haven't put the rent up since the tenant moved in 6 years ago, I am going to have to now.

  • icon

    Do those Government Departments calling a rent freeze not confer with the Treasury to see if they would like a reduced amount of tax from letting due to being attributable from frozen income.

    icon

    In some cases where the landlord is making a lose HMRC might even have to make a tax refund

     
  • icon

    It’s a lovely thought but it always works out we owe them,
    every tenner £6 for u £4 for his highness if you made a profit either way u deal with all the crap .

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up