The current system of so-called ‘exempt rental accommodation’ has been condemned by MPs as “a complete mess” which wastes taxpayers’ money and fails many residents.
Exempt accommodation is the name given to a type of supported rental housing that is used to house a range of people with support needs - typical residents are the homeless, former prisoners and some people with mental illness.
Now the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities committee of MPs - which shadows the activities of the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities - is demanding a series of urgent reforms for the exempt rental sector, including the introduction of enforceable national standards and compulsory registration.
The report also calls for action to close the loopholes in the current system which “offers a licence to print money to those who wish to exploit it”.
The committee recommends that the government:
- introduces compulsory national minimum standards for exempt accommodation, including on referrals, care and support, and quality of housing;
- gives local councils the powers and resources to enforce these standards;
- requires all exempt accommodation providers to be registered;
- creates a National Oversight Committee to join-up existing regulators and mend the current ‘patchwork regulation’ which has too many holes;
- ensures the providers of exempt accommodation for survivors of domestic abuse have recognised expertise to provide specialist support and a safe environment;
- reviews the system of exempt housing benefit claims and clamp down on the exploitation of the lease-based exempt accommodation model for profit.
Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities committee, says: “While there are many good providers of exempt accommodation, the findings of our inquiry on the state of exempt accommodation are shocking. The current system of exempt accommodation is a complete mess which lets down residents and local communities and which rips off the taxpayer. The government must act now to help councils to tackle this situation and ensure people get the quality housing and support services they need to move on with their lives.
“The best examples of exempt accommodation highlight quality housing and specialist services, with proactive staff helping to support residents. However, in the worst cases support amounts to little more than a loaf of bread left on the table or a support worker shouting at the bottom of the stairs to check on residents.
“Residents and communities are being failed while unscrupulous providers make excessive profits by capitalising on loopholes in the system. Recently it has been reported in the media that these providers have included organised criminal gangs, who use the system to launder money. This gold-rush is all paid for by taxpayers through housing benefit. This must change and it is crucial the government brings forward reform on a range of areas including on standards, regulation and oversight, and on funding to put this right. In our changes we are not asking for any additional expenditure; we are calling on the government to get a grip on the vast sums it is paying out without effective oversight”.
The report also acknowledges the potential impact on neighbours and local communities of high concentrations of exempt accommodation, which can attract anti-social behaviour, crime, rubbish, and vermin. These impacts also risk undermining local support for supported housing. The report recommends the government take forward planning reforms, and close existing exemptions in legislation, to assist local councils in helping to manage supply in line with need and to balance with much needed family housing in local communities.
The report highlights the dearth of data on exempt accommodation which makes it difficult to determine how widespread the worst examples are and whether this taxpayer funded system is delivering value for money. The committee calls on the government to organise, within the next year, the collection, collation and publication of a range of key exempt accommodation annual statistics at a local authority level.
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
This needs to be done, my job means I visit a number of these establishments on a weekly basis, and they are grim, it maybe very loosely linked to the PRS but they are nothing most of us would see, there are some very vulnerable people who have complexity in every aspect of their lives. It really is the Wild West 🤠🐎
How does any of this apply to us ? I certainly would not rent to any of these kind of people, nightmare tenants, council's problem
Surely this gentleman can’t be an M.P he says it’s an unregulated rented sector, we are probably the most Regulated Sector in the Country. Is this guy totally inept, his first day on the job or is he drunk.
What is not recognised as that most of the so-called vulnerable tenants are housed in the private sector for a fraction of the rates that social landlords receive. Landlords like myself house many of them for rates have been frozen for over a decade. I look enviously at the social sector who are exempt licensing and much of the standards imposed on the private sector along with licensing and housing standards generally ignore them. They can also evict HMO tenant’s at will. No long court delays apply to HMO social landlords. On top of this they are paid eye watering sums compared to what I receive.
I was talking to a social landlord who housed care leavers.These are youngsters under the age of 22 who have been in care and I only get paid £60 and occasionally £90 a week to house the same tenants. When I challenged the social landlord over the disparity in rent he said, “ Jim you do not understand we have to feed, buy presents, take them on holiday and provide support.”
I have to provide 24 hour support for my tenants and only very occasionally had to help out tenants with food. I give my tenants Christmas presents and Christmas dinner. I do not take them on holiday but I am sure I could afford to if I receive £2000 per week per tenant! The disparity in funding for accommodation and the abuse private landlords receive is beyond words. Yes the system needs a shake up.
Jim Haliburton
The HMO daddy
Same goes for Private landlords housing Tenants in traditional family houses & flats, compared big boys build 2 rent multi storey Blocks of Flats charging 50 to 100% more, check it out for yourself.
Please login to comment