x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Tenants “at sharp end of cost of living crisis” - claim

A think tank says household costs are under more pressure from the cost of living crisis than in the pandemic, with renters “at the sharp end”.

A new Resolution Foundation analysis based on a survey of 10,470 adults examines how the cost of living crisis is affecting people’s ability to meet their housing costs. 

The share of households who are behind on or struggling with housing costs has risen by almost 70 per cent compared to the peak of the pandemic, from 26 per cent in January 2021 to 44 per cent in November 2022.

Advertisement

The foundation says: “Renters are at the sharp end of the crisis, as private and social rents are rising at their fastest rates in a decade, on top of wider cost of living increases. One-in-12 private renters reported falling behind on housing costs in the three months to November 2022, while over half reported struggling with their housing costs.”

The situation is even more acute for social renters, with nearly one-in-five falling behind and another four-in-10 struggling with their housing costs. Meanwhile just four per cent of mortgagors fell behind on housing costs over this period – although the broad-based nature of the cost-of-living crisis has led to a further 46 per cent struggling with housing costs.

The foundation continues: “The lower financial resilience of renters means that they are struggling more to cope with the cost-of-living crisis.”

Nearly half of social renters reported being unable to afford to replace electrical goods, or switch the heating on when needed. This fell to around a third of private renters and roughly a quarter of mortgagors.

The crisis has also put a considerable strain on people’s wellbeing, say the authors. More than two-in-five private and social renters reported feeling fairly or very worried about covering their housing costs over the winter, compared to almost a third of mortgagors.

The foundation says government intervention during the Covid-19 crisis – banning evictions, rebasing the Local Housing Allowance and mandating mortgage holidays – helped to minimise the impact of the pandemic on households. But it adds: "support is currently much more limited, despite many more households struggling with their housing costs … than during the peak of the pandemic.”

 

Overall, three-in-five social and private renters were behind on or struggling with their housing costs in November 2022, compared to two-in-five in January 2021. Increases were more dramatic among mortgagors, with the proportion behind or struggling with their housing costs almost doubling (between January 2021 and November 2022.

 

 

The foundation want the government to do more by re-basing the LHA rates and implementing measures to allow fair mediation between tenants and landlords when arrears build up.

A foundation spokesperson says: “Private and social renters are at the sharpest end of the cost-of-living crisis. The fastest rent rises in a decade, alongside wider cost of living pressures, have left three-in-five renters falling behind on or struggling with their housing costs. 

“This is significantly higher than at the peak of the pandemic, when there was substantially more Government support available to struggling households.

“With many renters reaching the limits of already depleted finances, this squeeze is having profound impacts on their household budgets and wellbeing. As housing costs are set to continue rising, the situation for renters will worsen without further policy intervention.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Well with what is happening right now, and more importantly what will happen WHEN Labour come to power…. Tenants had better have something left for more rent rise’s. This will be a disaster for renters. 👎🏻

  • icon

    Tenants are usually at the sharp end of a cost of living crisis - by definition they are usually young or in low paid jobs - that's why they rent.

    On the other hand I have seen mortgages go up by £200pcm whilst handing out rent rises of £25 - 50pcm. Tenants are at least protected from that!

    icon

    Totally agree.

    Many mortgages are rising from under 2% to over 5%, a rise of over 250%, although Patrick Harvie, the little Green helper of Nicola Sturgeon, thinks the newly permitted 3% rent increase in Scotland will cover this!

     
    icon

    If this report is done again in 6 months time, when a lot more fixed mortgages have been renewed, it will be a lot different.

     
  • icon

    SORRY you are in cloud cuckoo land labour already are discussing legislation to force landlords to reduce rents to affordable rent levels based on average income levels in the area , and have made it clear benefit claimant statistics will be included in those calculations, so based on that criteria it is likely local income rates will be assessed at below minimum wage levels and rents will be fixed at a percentage of that level, they are also proposing that these rent levels will be frozen at this artificial level for three to five years, even if a landlords mortgage interest is considerably higher than the rent.
    A labour spokesperson commented that if landlords were unable to pay their mortgages and their properties were repossessed " that would be no bad thing"

  • icon

    I am sure that this report is reasonably correct, but it is too shallow.
    Why are some people struggling and why are others not. I have never had a high paid job, but I have worked more than one job at a time in order to fund my house purchases. In addition I have been sensible and a little frugal on my spending.
    This has then enabled me to become reasonably successful with my portfolio.
    We seem to be in a race to the bottom currently and Politicians demonising us is not helpful.
    In surveys most tenants get on with their Landlords, then use the law better to punish the Landlords whom don't follow the rules. The same should be applied to tenants.
    But now I just don't see any light at the end of the tunnel and currently my mind set is to do a calculated and measured withdrawal from this industry. What is the incentive for me to stay!

    icon

    Totally agree.
    There are 168 hours in every week so no need to limit being paid for under 40 of them!

    Working another 10 hours should increase earnings by at least 25% and still leave 118 hours for other things.

     
  • icon

    Tenants get top up benefits to go towards their housing costs but sometimes choose to spend it on other things. Other than a very protracted eviction there are usually no real consequences.

    Homeowners don't receive those top ups but tend to understand getting into mortgage arrears can cause serious harm to their credit rating.

    So homeowners have different consequences to spending choices and clearly are better at prioritizing spending accordingly.

    Always remember a homeowner on £50K only takes home about £37K for working full time.
    A tenant with a couple of children earning minimum wage in a part time job will take home around £32K including benefit top ups and won't have the same travel to work or child care costs to pay for.

    Single childless people get woefully inadequate benefits but any tenant with children is significantly better off than a homeowner with children doing the same job, earning the same wage.

    icon

    Its interesting what you say, and makes you think something is badly wrong with the system,

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up