x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Investors could save tens of thousands with cash-only purchases

A new analysis of discounts available to cash buyer suggests they can save tens of thousands of pounds on some property purchases compared with rival buyers needing mortgages.

Apex Bridging has analysed current property listings in Great Britain and compared the average asking price for cash-only listings to the average price across the wider overall market.

The analysis reveals that, should these buyers choose to pay in cash rather than take out a mortgage, they can make significant savings. 

Advertisement

The average asking price of all current market listings in Great Britain is £255,588. Meanwhile, the average price among cash-only listings is 30.2 per cent lower at £178,366. This is a saving of £77,222. 

On a regional level, the biggest percentage savings are found in London where cash buyers are benefiting from a discount of 32.6 per cent. Due to the capital’s expensive market, this is a saving of £159,317. 

Above average cash buyer savings are also available in Wales and the East of England (both 32.3 per cent), East Midlands (31.5 per cent), and South East (30.6 per cent). 

But while the potential savings are obvious, how likely is it that you’ll be able to find a cash-only listing?

In Britain, there are currently 4,924 cash-only listings on the market. The South East is home to the largest proportion of these properties, with 1,345 listings accounting for 27.3 per cent of the national total. 

Buyers in Scotland and the North East will have the hardest time finding a cash-only property, as the two regions account for just 0.7 and 1.6 per cent of the national total respectively.

“Sellers will often request a cash buyer because it tends to lead to a faster transaction by sidestepping the laborious mortgage approval process. For the privilege of speed, these sellers are willing to accept less money for their property. As our data shows, they tend to be willing to reduce the price by 30 per cent” explains the managing director of Apex Bridging, Chris Hodgkinson.

“Cash purchases also play a role when it comes to properties that have fire damage or other serious structural issues that will require immediate attention from the new buyers. Sellers will often accept a cash offer below the asking price because it means they can rid themselves of the property quickly, and it’s an acceptance that the buyer will have to spend additional money fixing it up. 

“But often a cash purchase can use up the money that would otherwise be spent on renovations. In such instances, a bridging loan like those provided by Apex Bridging can provide short-term cover for shortfall in cash.

“This news will be cold comfort to the vast majority of homebuyers who have no choice but to take out a mortgage, but for anyone who is wanting to move soon and is fortunate enough to be able to afford a cash purchase, it’s vital insight."

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Vendors will not necessarily give you a big discount for csh but it does allow you to secure a property over someone with either a house to sell or a mortgage offer to wait for!

  • icon

    Well where would you get the cash, if you had the cash you wouldn’t need a lender maybe if you had equity in other property you could draw against them becoming a cash buyer on another Property .

  • icon

    There is no way I would sell to cash buyers. Many times the agents have asked me about a possible sale to cash purchasers. I have always refused stating the property is not for sale, but for letting only. Some agents have the audacity to do viewings to these investors, when asked to rent it out. I do not use these agents anymore. As a seller, I shall get my cash, whether the buyer is a cash purchaser or getting a mortgage. So I cannot see the advantages in getting 15 to 20% less than the market value. When I come to sell it, cash or mortgaged buyer, I would like to sell at market rate or near that price. The agents get their fat fees from selling rather than just renting, as they sell it to their existing clients.

    icon

    But Vibha, some people are desperate to sell and can’t afford to wait until a purchaser has sourced a mortgage.

     
  • icon

    I'd agree its tedious getting a mortgage, but doesn't necessarily take a long time. I had a mortgage offer within 2 weeks recently, the searches weren't even back, so doesn't cause any delay. I avoid cash buyers as they always expect a massive discount. Generally happy to wait for a mortgage to be approved as the conveyancing process is rarely quicker than the mortgage offer. The only exception was about 18 months ago I agreed the sale of a tenanted property to a newbie investor, took him 6 months to get a mortgage offer. So I will not be selling any properties with tenants in future, it will be S21 all round. Hey ho.

  • icon

    Buyers don't need to have found a property to buy before obtaining a mortgage offer in principle. I have done it, knowing the maximum amount I was able to borrow and then finding a property I know I am able to proceed with, just subject to lender's survey, which is almost always accepted so long as the property is sensibly priced and the buyer is coming up with a reasonable deposit.

  • icon

    " the average price among cash-only listings is 30.2 per cent lower" wouldn't these be properties that you would be unable to get a mortgage on, thus reducing the number of available buyers? If so this would dilute the average downwards. On a mortgageable property no one is going to discount that much.

  • icon

    Christopher, you are right those used to be Auction Properties those were bought by slum landlords, who wouldn’t renovate them either just let them out we know all this. The other buyers were builders who certainly would refurbish them, that was their Business and took pride in it. The slum landlords with the best will in the World couldn’t do it, it wasn’t in them. Back then you wouldn’t see a house in good condition in the Auction. As the saying goes it was an Auction Property.

  • icon

    You can get in trouble to with Mortgage’s I interested in a house some years back. Another guy jumped in quickly signed up and paid the Deposit then wasn’t able to complete it fell to me and I bought it. However it’s my understanding the first buyer lost his Deposit, the owner was as guilty as hell telling me not to tell anyone where he moved to, what’s your take on this.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up