x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Renters Reform Bill - just a delay or a major rethink?

The government has back-tracked on its decision to publish the long-awaited Renters Reform Bill this week.

The Mirror newspaper reports this morning that “procedural issues” have been blamed for the delay in introducing the Bill to Parliament. 

The Bill was first pledged by the Conservative administration back in 2019 and only last week Housing Secretary Michael Gove told Sky News that it would, at last, see the light of day this week, just days after the Coronation.

Advertisement

But the Mirror reports: “The government had vowed to finally publish the Renters Reform Bill this week, more than four years after the Tories first promised to scrap no fault evictions. But the long-awaited overhaul has been postponed due to ‘procedural issues’.”

Over the Bank Holiday weekend speculation was mounting that Tory backbenchers were unhappy with the pro-tenant, anti-landlord sentiment contained in the proposed legislation.

Another newspaper - the online i - used unnamed sources and reported: “A group of Conservative backbenchers – some of whom are landlords and, according to Westminster sources, reportedly include the former chairman of national estate agency chain Hunters, Kevin Hollinrake – are unhappy about the pro-renter legislation and have been lobbying against it.”Today's Mirror - a Labour-supporting publication - also carries a pledge from shadow housing secretary Lisa Nandy to introduce more far reaching reforms of the private rental sector.

Nandy tells the paper: “Our message to the government is clear. So not backtrack on the promises you have made, do not drop any commitments, do not roll over to your backbenchers again.”

A Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities spokesman says: “We are absolutely committed to delivering a fairer deal for renters.

“We will bring forward legislation very shortly, which will include a ban on ‘no fault’ evictions, so that all tenants have greater security in their homes and are empowered to challenge poor conditions.

“We are also introducing a Decent Homes Standard for the Private Rented Sector for the first time ever which will make sure privately rented homes are safe and decent.”

Here is the Mirror story.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Sounds like good news for tenants! Many who were going to get a Section 21 notice will now be left in peace.

    icon

    Sadly only a temporary reprieve until Labour get in at the next election. I was poised to send out section 21 notices as I won't stay in the PRS. Have already sold three properties in last 9 months as tenants moved. Can't run a business with such uncertainty and effectively the loss of our property.

     
    icon

    Fully understand how you feel Geraldine. The risk of losing control/ownership of the property is what is making so many landlords sell. The business is not a safe one.

    However, my tenants are on the whole quite good/nice and I would carry on if it weren't for the extremist anti-landlord policies on the horizon.

     
    icon

    Too late for 2 of my tenants. S21 done ages ago…one eventually left after sourcing another property and one just need to invoke court bailiff.

     
    icon

    Landlords should have the right to get their property back at the end of the contract with their tenants. The tenants should respect the landlords decision to give their tenants notice to leave since both parties have agreed to serving notices to one another. If the tenants refuse to leave, then they are clearly in breach of their contract and this is ‘fault’ eviction. The section21 should be strengthened in favour of Labdlords in such circumstances.

     
    Fery  Lavassani

    Sam you are correct if the tenancies remain AST. But that is going to go as well. Instead under the new proposed legislation we revert back to Assured Tenancies which they will call it "open ended tenancies". So future tenancies will not have an end date. This new legislation is bringing the old "protected tenancies" through the back door commonly known as "sitting tenants". For this reason, I am out.

     
  • icon

    Could the government finally be seeing that the very unbalanced Renters Reform, would see even less private rental accommodation available than there is now?

    icon

    That's crediting them with more sense than they have currently!

     
  • icon

    The lefties will be eating their red berets 😂😂

    icon

    😂 😂 👍

     
  • icon

    A welcome delay, but delay is all it is, labour will introduce something far worse within weeks of being elected, and let's face it elected they will be, those that want to get out need to be out before the GE, those with suspect tenants need to be getting rid pretty damn quick, any low rents need to be increased now while we still can, we can prepare for the storm before it happens and we all must

  • icon

    The exodus of landlords for a variety of reasons does now seem to be making its way (quite belatedly) into the mainstream news. I don't think it is going to help us much though.

  • Steven Williams

    I’ll be honest I wasn’t expecting a retraction again in it.

    By day he is Michael Gove, by night he is the superhero by the name of…… THE RETRACTOR!!! 😂😂😂

  • icon

    Someone, but not Gove has seen the light of day on this ridiculous act. Landlords have spoken with their feet by exiting in their droves. As said by many others, no Landlord evicts a good tenant unless they are forced to sell.

  • icon

    Thi news will not cause me to change my direction of getting out of a 40+ property portfolio built over 30 years.

    At best this news is only a short term respite for landlords (and tenants), before labour take power and make our anti landlord 'non Conservative' Conservative government look like pussycats.

    icon

    Same here Saul. I'm getting out too... Enough is enough!

     
  • icon

    Maybe the penny has dropped that tories have been busy sacrificing their core voters to appease those who will never vote for them anyway. Then again, with the lunacy they've been showing the last few years I suspect I'm crediting them with more foresight than they actually have - more likely the delay is due to classic political incompetence - pure and simple.

  • icon

    Any postponement of this load of nonsense is good news.

  • icon

    I actually don't think Labour will win a majority at the next election and perhaps the Tories are thinking that Landlords plus those sensible tenants who understand the potential harm might just make the difference?

    Expect up to 20 Scottish Tory MP's next time. It was the Scottish Tories and anti SNP tactical voting that saved Theresa May in 2017. The same could happen in 2024.

    icon

    Well let's hope you're right Robert although I have my doubts

     
    icon

    Andrew

    Remember 1992 when Major unexpectedly beat Kinnock as voters preferred Major's safer pair of hands?

    I think Rishi could have the same effect over Labour this time?

     
    Fery  Lavassani

    Back in 92 it was Rupert Murdoch and the Sun newspaper that rigged the election. In the morning of the election Sun had it on front page "if Labour win, will the last person leave Britain turn the lights off". The Sun has lost its power of controlling voter's mind. I guess Labour is coming, so I am getting out.



























     
    icon

    I do remember 92 very well Robert, we had a postman deliver to out garage, a good chap, but red hot labour he was convinced labour would walk it, we never let him live that one down, I mean Kinnock ? who could take that fool seriously, it wasn't so much a win for Major, more a disaster for Kinnock.

     
    icon

    I remember that morning too. It was great. I was only a teenager but it was such a relief in the morning. I also remember in the run up Kinnock + wife walking on the beach and he fell over.

     
    icon

    This was meant as a reply to Grumpy Doug below but I couldn't move it to the proper post reply bit - but now managed to do so.

    Without the SNP, I would be looking at monthly rents around £2000, not £2600 - so thank you sincerely, SNP and your little Green helpers!

     
  • James Scollard

    52% of all students are in PRS. If tenancies are periodic, students will leave after 8 months or stay on for 14 months. As a student landlord, this makes in unviable.
    Bad news for universities. I hope they are ready.

    icon

    James

    In Scotland students have actually become the tenants of choice and do tend to leave at the end of May or June.

    Some do annoyingly leave it to the last minute before giving the minimum 28 days notice but new tenants will live with not having a definite move in date until 28 days before.

    I remind them that they will probably be asked for a Landlord reference and cooperation with the Landlord is a major factor for new Landlords to consider.

    The lack of fixed term tenancies has destroyed things more for families than students but one major casualty has been the Edinburgh and St Andrews hybrid market with holiday lets from June to September and student lets from mid September to May. Since Landlords can't take definite bookings until the students get their acts together, many student flats are now full-time short term rentals adding further to the overall shortage of rental properties.

    There are no winners but families are harder hit than students and rents, which went up about 30% in 2017/2018 when the SNP anti PRS legislation came into force, are now about 30% more than then due to market forces with the rent freeze and cap not applying to new tenancies.

    A good 4 bed student flat in Scotland got £1600 per month in 2017, rising to £2100 in 2018 and can now get £2600 or so in 2023 - thanks to the SNP causing so many Landlords to sell up.

    I'm still in this for the long haul despite everything that the SNP and their little Green helpers throw at me.

     
    icon

    Thank you for that Robert. That echoes much of my thoughts as I plan going forward. I'm exclusively student lets. Your point about references is extremely valid. Here where I am, the student market is mainly managed through about half a dozen agents, all of whom know each other well. News about bad groups of students is widely shared, so those that "play" the system will find themselves out in the cold when they come to find further accommodation or seek references.
    I've spoken to all my current groups. Suffice to say they are blissfully ignorant of what's proposed. However it's also crystal clear that they are happy with the current arrangements so I'm fairly relaxed. There'll be a lot more due diligence however and I'm sure a few faint hearts will pull out which is fine by me.
    And £2600 for a group of 4 - that's bonkers. The people of Scotland have a lot to thank the SNP for ..... NOT !

     
    icon

    Grumpy

    Without the SNP, I would be looking at monthly rents around £2000, not £2600 - so thank you sincerely, SNP and your little Green helpers!

     
  • icon

    It's a disaster for this country.
    Even in courts today, landlord is by default guilty.

    S21 served on some tenants and I will be serving more all as I will exit the direct tenanting business.
    The policies are draconian.

  • icon

    If they are having a rethink then they should make provision for all fixed short term tenancies in the bill which are up to nine or ten months in duration. Not all tenants who want to rent for a fixed short term period are students, and not everyone who wants to rent for that period are on holiday. There are people on fixed short term work assignments for example and who work temporarily in another part of the country from where they normally live (sometimes from overseas)- or there are people in the process of buying a house who need temporary accommodation. There are numerous reasons why tenants want fixed term short term accommodation including not wishing to enter into an open-ended periodic tenancy if they are sharing.

    In my view, housing those categories of people is a major role for the private rental sector.

    icon

    Ellie

    I agree but those wanting short term rentals just need to give 28 days notice now in Scotland. It's the families who want to stay put that most Landlords in Scotland are now wary of due to the limited options available for repossession.

    Also see my reply to James above about how this is panning out in Scotland after 5 or 6 years.

     
    icon

    Robert, you are an expert on the consequences of this form of legislation

    Aren't there complications though if there are sharers on a periodic contract and one wants to leave and the others want to stay? My tenants have preferred to have six month fixed term contracts which allow one person to return somewhere (overseas usually in my personal experience), so that a new fixed term contract is entered into for another six months with one different person whose references have been checked.

     
    icon

    Ellie

    You're right about potential problems in a joint tenancy which needs unanimous agreement to be terminated.

    In theory a student could drop out of University, stop paying rent but refuse to move out and the tenancy would continue indefinitely. If their guarantors refused to pay the rent then the other guarantors would have to stump up.

    Currently the only escape route for the joint tenants would be to stop paying rent until a court took action to evict them all risking their credit ratings moving forward and landline them with huge costs.

    For joint tenancies a fixed term tenancy agreement should always be available to avoid being held to ransom by a rogue flatmate. The SNP refused to treat joint tenants or students tenants differently from families as they said that this would put families at a disadvantage as potential tenants.

    Families are now at this very same disadvantage but joint tenants are now exposed to the risk of the actions of their flatmates without the escape route of a fixed term tenancy.

    Since 2017 I have successfully twice had a mid term change of a joint tenant when one dropped out. The onus was on the current four tenants to find a suitable replacement and then on the same day the four current tenants signed a formal notice to quit and the remaining three and the new tenant signed a new open ended tenancy agreement.

    The departing tenant and the new tenant agreed informally exactly how the change over happened and I didn't have to do anything other than agree to waive the 28 day notice period to allow the new tenant to move in on the day the departing tenant formally moved out.

    If all agree, there's no problem. If one doesn't agree, the current tenancy can't be easily or cheaply terminated in the current People's Republic of Scotland.

    On a related point, on one of these two occasions, the departing tenant quibbled on paying for utilities after leaving but still a joint tenant. I asked Safe Deposits Scotland if I could withhold part of the deposit to recompense the remaining tenants for the missing utility payments and was told that the deposit couldn't be used to compensate a "third party" - the joint tenants!

     
    icon

    It sounds as though it is almost an unworkable system in Scotland for sharers.

     
    icon

    I was under the belief that, one tenant can give notice for all on a joint tenancy (which used to be the case *outside* a fixed term).

     
    icon

    Luke

    In Scotland a joint tenancy can now only be terminated with the unanimous agreement of ALL joint tenants as the focus is on ensuring no tenant, joint or otherwise, can be compelled to give up their home, other than a few strictly defined circumstances like the owner selling, repossession, urgent major repairs etc.

    It's actually easier to get rid of a spouse than a rogue flatmate! I'm a bit surprised that the interests of an abused partner didn't get more attention but then the rights of "normal" men and women (usually accepted definitions) are trumped by the rights of those who don't want to be either ( or perhaps both?).

     
    icon

    Ellie

    It actually works fine for joint tenants in the vast majority of cases, apart from being a major disadvantage for families wanting to stay long term. However the previous system also worked well for the vast majority of tenants but with less protection for rogue tenants than they now enjoy.

    Only rogue tenants win under the new system but then only the rogue tenants need or want the help of Shelter, Generation Rant, Acorn and other loony lefties who are really hurting all decent tenants, especially families.

     
  • icon

    I think any delay is good news. But we can all see the direction of travel. Several governments / housing ministers / the odious Gove have all committed to ending S21. Truss had to back down at PMQs over rumours they had done to their senses.

    We can expected some watering down of the Brown Paper but not too much. But hopefully underneath they can engineer some loopholes so they can save face.

  • David Saunders

    Seems the sxxt has hit the fan in Tory policymaking department and the realisation that sucking up to renters will/is not winning them many if any votes as they expected. whereas landlords voting for Tory has become as likely as turkeys voting for Christmas.

  • icon

    I suspect the recent local election losses have also caused some soul searching. A lot of voters I understand abstained from voting for these non-Tories.

    icon

    I voted green and labour, not because I support them, simply because I couldn't bring myself to vote tory, the 2 tory councillors did get in, but it was close in what was a safe conservative area, a strong message has been sent to government

     
    icon

    Andrew

    Unless you are also going to vote Green (aka Deep Red) or Labour in the General Election, then the Tories can recover ground.

    Labour might be able to form a coalition with the Lib Dims, SNP and Greens, but that would be worse than pure Labour!

    Unfortunately only a majority Tory government, not trying to win over lefty voters, can stop this country from getting even deeper into the mire.

     
    icon

    Any coalition will likely come at the price of proportional representation. Sure, the country will have to endure a single term of a predominantly Labour Govt, but then we should be able to send real messages to the Westminster elites and see more Reform MPs and the like.

     
  • icon

    It s ridiculous to punish all of the good landlords that sometimes end up with bad tenants. The govenment is shortsighted in it's thinking. I am sure that we all agree that there are a lot of "slum" lords out there. They treat their tenants like cash cows and don't do anything to fix any issues that arise, because it interupts their cash flow. These are the ones that should be dealt with, not a blanket cover for all landlords. The government thinks that elimination of Section 21 means that tenants can stay in the accomodation and the local council will not have to provide housing for them. The thinking is flawed because if we all quit the PRS, then there are no rental properties available and the councils will be required by law to provide housing for these tenants. I only became a landlord in the UK because my son went to uni in Brighton and the first two places he stayed were unfit for human habitation. I called the council about the last property he stayed in (electric wires hanging out of the walls, no gas or electric cert, boiler not working, mould everywhere) and the council replied that they had a previous complaint on the same property, 3 years previously, but did not have the manpower to do anything about it! I then called the HSE and reported the owner and the council. Because of that, I bought a property in Brighton for my son to live in. After he finished Uni, we rented it out to a couple of nurses that then sublet it to others. I sectioned them all and now am cleaning, repainting, etc. to repair damage, mould, etc.

    icon

    Charles

    There are a FEW rogue landlords but the vast majority are decent as proven time and again in surveys on tenant satisfaction.

    You point out that the current legislation isn't enforced so further legislation just pushes up rent due to higher costs incurred by the law abiding majority of landlords and the shortage of properties.

    It's simply the politics of envy from the disgruntled lefties who aren't interested in improving things for tenants, just in making things worse for landlords.

    Incidentally I dramatically increased my involvement in the prs when my own kids were students but quite fortuitously I bought the properties in their name- initially to give them a tax free income in renting the other rooms to mates, but the main benefit is that these properties have never been part of my estate. All three kids bought a second flat with me acting as guarantor on a btl mortgage before graduation and have continued to buy more despite the current SNP legislation.

    I now charge them to manage their portfolios, avoiding breaching the 60% marginal tax penalty and give this excess income directly to the grandchildren, effectively doubling the amount they get if their parents had paid this directly out of taxed income.

     
    icon

    I think the only slum landlords we now have in Norwich are the council and housing assocs and in fairness to them that has more to do with the types of tenants they now rent to, the ones we wouldn't touch with a barge pole, horses for courses you might say

     
    icon

    In fact there are very few rouge landlords and rather a lot of better ones.
    In context, there are circa 2.4 million PRS landlords and nationally 397 were prosecuted for housing offences in 2022.

    Context matters.

     
  • Rik Landlord

    I'm waiting to hear lib dems housing policies since tory and Labour are equally terrible for PRS

    icon

    Don't bother. Wera Hobhouse (Lib Dem) wants employees to be able to sue employers if they have their feelings hurt at work. Anything that comes out of them will not be better.

     
  • Matthew Payne

    On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place.

  • icon

    Nigel Farage has been on GB News with a good piece on landlords. I can't paste the link but the title on Youtube is:

    Net Zero ‘LUNACY’ exposed as landlords warned over prospect of surging costs

    Also refers to Crispin Odey (a big hedge fund manager) called Gove a communist :))

  • icon

    Luke I believe you are correct and it’s the way it always was but some of the interfering busy bodies tries to put a different slant on it.
    One Contract means one Contract Joint & Several (say 5) which they signed up to, so if one breaks it, it’s Broken, if 4 leaves the one remaining is responsible for the lot.
    The Bill has been delayed, they must have thought of another load of crap to put on it.

    icon

    I think the Tories might be peer reviewing Comrade Gove's work. After the election failures last week they should be taking a long hard look at themselves and listen to the feedback they got from their campaigning and the results.

    As my post above prominent people are critical of Gove. AirBNB are also going to challenge his draconian proposals for holiday lets. I suspect those in govt can see he has been going too far for too long in the wrong direction. There's probably a few fisticuffs behind the scenes whilst it gets watered down.

     
  • icon

    Pollution and all this talK about ULEZ, which affects Workers, Business. Tenants & landlords severely.
    I lived right on the North Circular Road, 30 years ago my neighbour just 2 doors away from me which was there many years before me and is still there right on the Gyratory System in fact my house was called this name.
    Some years back Mr Khan extended ULEZ to this Road deliberately to make it worse.
    Low & behold the lady is still there with her husband both are amazing and out for a walk together at a grand old age.
    She Celebrated her 100 Birthday other day, Mr Khan are you sure you know what you are doing making a mess.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up