x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Warning to private tenants to be wary of ‘no fee, no win’ action

A Manchester-based solicitors’ firm that incorrectly prosecuted a London council over a private rental case has been ordered to pay thousands of pounds in court costs.

Antony Hodari Solicitors was representing a tenant of a private landlord who wanted to claim against her landlord for an alleged mice infestation in her property.

However the legal firm claimed that Barking and Dagenham Council was her landlord and that the tenant paid rent to the council, despite there being no rental agreement in place and the council never having received any rental money from her. The tenant paid rent to a letting agent, acting on behalf of a landlord.

Advertisement

The council made several requests to the solicitors asking them to clarify why they were bringing the claim against the council and said there was no basis to bring the claim against the council.

Despite this, the Manchester solicitors filed a witness statement alleging that Barking and Dagenham was the landlord, received rent from her and had made various failed attempts to repair the property.

After an initial hearing in October 2023, Antony Hodari Solicitors had to drop the charges after accepting it had prosecuted the wrong defendant. As a result, the council made a Wasted Costs Application against the legal firm because of its alleged negligence.

In response, Antony Hodari Solicitors also made a Wasted Costs Application against the Barking and Dagenham Council, alleging it was the council’s fault that it had been wrongly prosecuted.

The costs applications were heard at Romford Magistrates Court last week and the court made a costs award against the solicitors’ firm of £7,576. The court also dismissed Antony Hodari’s wasted costs application against the council.

A council spokesperson says: “This law firm was determined to take action the Council, regardless of the evidence. A prosecution should only be started if there is sufficient evidence to justify it. This was a complete waste of not just council officer time but court officer time as well as huge sums of money. It is also a wakeup call to people to be wary of no win no fee solicitors.

“We will always fight cases like this that could put our council in a bad light and look to take advantage of our residents.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • John  Adams

    Perhaps the Solicitors Regulation Authority would care to investigate?

  • icon

    Typical no-win parasites 🦠

  • Peter Why Do I Bother

    Hey I am suing you!!
    Why?
    Because I am?
    Why?
    Because it's your fault
    What is?
    Never mind that, where's the compo?
    What for?
    Pay up
    What for?
    Not going to tell you again
    Tell me what for?
    See you in court
    What for? oh ok see you there
    Ha Ha, this will cost you
    What will?
    Hello Judge, we have brought this case before you as we would like some compo
    Thank you for bringing the case to my attention, now what have the council done?
    ????????????? Errrrmmmm
    GET OUT and Case dismissed...!! Timewasting Parasite!!!

    For once I am glad the council had the backbone to stand up against this kind of nonsense.

    icon

    We must all do the same, stand up to them and fight them. don't let them walk over us

     
  • icon

    I had these Anthony Hodari parasites write to me. All they did was send a standard letter with the tenant’s statement copied and pasted in. They were clear to point out they take no responsibility for anything. It’s a pre-action protocol letter where you need to gather all your evidence before they deciding to take you to court. I did it. Cost me £600+VAT to use a solicitor. I was doing it all myself. You basically need to anyway gathering all the evidence.

    They use a expert on mould who Anthony Hodari is also a director of so I used that against them.

    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Well Done Nick!!

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up