Ongoing ‘tax grab’ deters investors says senior l...

The head of lettings agency Benham and Reeves has made an outspoken attack on stamp duty.

The agency analysed data from the Land Registry for homes sold over the last 12 months, calculating the total stamp duty owed on these transactions and how this cost differs across each area of the nation.

The research shows that an estimated £3.657 billion has been paid in stamp duty across England over the last 12 months and a significant chunk of this has been paid by London homebuyers.

An estimated £1.490 billion was paid across the London market alone, accounting for 40.7% of the national total.

Kensington and Chelsea sits top where an estimated £207m was paid in stamp duty over the last year - that’s 5.6% of the entire national total.

Westminster also accounted for 5% of the national stamp duty bill, with an estimated £183.8m paid over the last 12 months alone.

Wandsworth completes the top three with a stamp duty bill of £108.7m.

Buckinghamshire was home to the highest stamp duty bill outside of the capital at just over £76m, with Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (£38m) and Cornwall (£32.7m) the only other areas outside of London to make the top 20.

Director of Benham and Reeves, Marc von Grundherr, comments: “Stamp duty is an outdated tax grab that acts as nothing more than a thorn in the side of the nation’s homebuyers and one that has remained there due to the greed of a stubborn government intent on taxing our ascent up the property ladder.

“Now more than ever, the calls to abolish stamp duty must be heard. In the last year we’ve seen a considerable reduction in buyer market activity as they’ve struggled to overcome the obstacle of higher mortgage rates and it simply isn’t right that they have to also contend with the ever increasing cost of stamp duty to boot.

“What’s more, such a punitive tax also acts as a deterrent to investors and can have a big impact on off-plan sales, particularly when coupled with inflation and higher interest rates.

“Removing this additional cost would go some way in rejuvenating both existing and new-build market activity and helping to drive buyers back into the fold.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

Martin Byrne
10 April 2024 10:03 AM

I was listening to Radio 4's consumer program about pension affordability. So many of the callers were complaining they were struggling to afford to retire, but what got me was the number of them on state benefits of one sort or another, many of which were due to "ill health" with one talking about how she's struggled with mental illness herself and having to care for her offspring who has "autism". This highlighted to me that so many are receiving benefits on, in my view, spurious grounds supported by a flawed system that encourages indolence leading to a mass lazy and feckless underclass that we have to fund. I note Labour intend to clamp down of existing tax payers. No mention of a clamp down on benefits wastrels and chancers.

John Young
11 April 2024 11:14 AM

Same, my son has recently had good bonuses from work and pushed him into the higher tax bracket so he has increased his pension contributions to bring him back into the basic bracket. He hates the thought of paying 40% tax.